# 13.5: Equilibrium Calculations

- Page ID
- 38270

\( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

\( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)

\( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)

\( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)

\( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)

\( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)

\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

\( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\)

\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

\( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)

\( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)

\( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\)

\( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)

\( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\)

\( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)

\( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)

\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)

\( \newcommand{\vectorA}[1]{\vec{#1}} % arrow\)

\( \newcommand{\vectorAt}[1]{\vec{\text{#1}}} % arrow\)

\( \newcommand{\vectorB}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

\( \newcommand{\vectorC}[1]{\textbf{#1}} \)

\( \newcommand{\vectorD}[1]{\overrightarrow{#1}} \)

\( \newcommand{\vectorDt}[1]{\overrightarrow{\text{#1}}} \)

\( \newcommand{\vectE}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{\mathbf {#1}}}} \)

\( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

\( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)

\(\newcommand{\avec}{\mathbf a}\) \(\newcommand{\bvec}{\mathbf b}\) \(\newcommand{\cvec}{\mathbf c}\) \(\newcommand{\dvec}{\mathbf d}\) \(\newcommand{\dtil}{\widetilde{\mathbf d}}\) \(\newcommand{\evec}{\mathbf e}\) \(\newcommand{\fvec}{\mathbf f}\) \(\newcommand{\nvec}{\mathbf n}\) \(\newcommand{\pvec}{\mathbf p}\) \(\newcommand{\qvec}{\mathbf q}\) \(\newcommand{\svec}{\mathbf s}\) \(\newcommand{\tvec}{\mathbf t}\) \(\newcommand{\uvec}{\mathbf u}\) \(\newcommand{\vvec}{\mathbf v}\) \(\newcommand{\wvec}{\mathbf w}\) \(\newcommand{\xvec}{\mathbf x}\) \(\newcommand{\yvec}{\mathbf y}\) \(\newcommand{\zvec}{\mathbf z}\) \(\newcommand{\rvec}{\mathbf r}\) \(\newcommand{\mvec}{\mathbf m}\) \(\newcommand{\zerovec}{\mathbf 0}\) \(\newcommand{\onevec}{\mathbf 1}\) \(\newcommand{\real}{\mathbb R}\) \(\newcommand{\twovec}[2]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\ctwovec}[2]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\threevec}[3]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cthreevec}[3]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\fourvec}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cfourvec}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\fivevec}[5]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \\ #5 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cfivevec}[5]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \\ #5 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\mattwo}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{rr}#1 \amp #2 \\ #3 \amp #4 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\laspan}[1]{\text{Span}\{#1\}}\) \(\newcommand{\bcal}{\cal B}\) \(\newcommand{\ccal}{\cal C}\) \(\newcommand{\scal}{\cal S}\) \(\newcommand{\wcal}{\cal W}\) \(\newcommand{\ecal}{\cal E}\) \(\newcommand{\coords}[2]{\left\{#1\right\}_{#2}}\) \(\newcommand{\gray}[1]{\color{gray}{#1}}\) \(\newcommand{\lgray}[1]{\color{lightgray}{#1}}\) \(\newcommand{\rank}{\operatorname{rank}}\) \(\newcommand{\row}{\text{Row}}\) \(\newcommand{\col}{\text{Col}}\) \(\renewcommand{\row}{\text{Row}}\) \(\newcommand{\nul}{\text{Nul}}\) \(\newcommand{\var}{\text{Var}}\) \(\newcommand{\corr}{\text{corr}}\) \(\newcommand{\len}[1]{\left|#1\right|}\) \(\newcommand{\bbar}{\overline{\bvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\bhat}{\widehat{\bvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\bperp}{\bvec^\perp}\) \(\newcommand{\xhat}{\widehat{\xvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\vhat}{\widehat{\vvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\uhat}{\widehat{\uvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\what}{\widehat{\wvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\Sighat}{\widehat{\Sigma}}\) \(\newcommand{\lt}{<}\) \(\newcommand{\gt}{>}\) \(\newcommand{\amp}{&}\) \(\definecolor{fillinmathshade}{gray}{0.9}\)- Write equations representing changes in concentration and pressure for chemical species in equilibrium systems
- Use algebra to perform various types of equilibrium calculations

We know that at equilibrium, the value of the reaction quotient of any reaction is equal to its equilibrium constant. Thus, we can use the mathematical expression for *Q* to determine a number of quantities associated with a reaction at equilibrium or approaching equilibrium. While we have learned to identify in which direction a reaction will shift to reach equilibrium, we want to extend that understanding to quantitative calculations. We do so by evaluating the ways that the concentrations of products and reactants change as a reaction approaches equilibrium, keeping in mind the stoichiometric ratios of the reaction. This algebraic approach to equilibrium calculations will be explored in this section.

Changes in concentrations or pressures of reactants and products occur as a reaction system approaches equilibrium. In this section we will see that we can relate these changes to each other using the coefficients in the balanced chemical equation describing the system. We use the decomposition of ammonia as an example.

On heating, ammonia reversibly decomposes into nitrogen and hydrogen according to this equation:

\[\ce{2NH3}(g)⇌\ce{N2}(g)+\ce{3H2}(g) \nonumber \]

If a sample of ammonia decomposes in a closed system and the concentration of N_{2} increases by 0.11 *M*, the change in the N_{2} concentration, Δ[N_{2}], the final concentration minus the initial concentration, is 0.11 *M*. The change is positive because the concentration of N_{2} increases.

The change in the H_{2} concentration, Δ[H_{2}], is also positive—the concentration of H_{2} increases as ammonia decomposes. The chemical equation tells us that the change in the concentration of H_{2} is three times the change in the concentration of N_{2} because for each mole of N_{2} produced, 3 moles of H_{2} are produced.

\[ \begin{align*} \ce{Δ[H2]} &=3×\ce{Δ[N2]} \\[4pt] &=3×(0.11\:M) \\[4pt] &=0.33\:M \end{align*} \nonumber \]

The change in concentration of NH_{3}, Δ[NH_{3}], is twice that of Δ[N_{2}]; the equation indicates that 2 moles of NH_{3} must decompose for each mole of N_{2} formed. However, the change in the NH_{3} concentration is negative because the concentration of ammonia *decreases* as it decomposes.

\[ \begin{align*} Δ[\ce{NH3}] &=−2×Δ[\ce{N2}] \\[4pt] &=−2×(0.11\:M) \\[4pt] &=−0.22\:M \end{align*} \nonumber \]

We can relate these relationships directly to the coefficients in the equation

\[\begin{align}

&\phantom{Δ[NH3}\ce{2NH3}(g)

&&⇌

&&\phantom{Δ[N2}\ce{N2}(g)

&&+

&&\phantom{Δ[H2]}\ce{3H2}(g)\\

&Δ[\ce{NH3}]=−2×Δ[\ce{N2}]&& && Δ[\ce{N2}]=0.11\:M && && Δ[\ce{H2}]=3×Δ[\ce{N2}]

\end{align} \nonumber \]

Note that all the changes on one side of the arrows are of the same sign and that all the changes on the other side of the arrows are of the opposite sign.

If we did not know the magnitude of the change in the concentration of N_{2}, we could represent it by the symbol *x*.

The changes in the other concentrations would then be represented as:

\(Δ[\ce{H2}]=3×Δ[\ce{N2}]=3x\)

The coefficients in the Δ terms are identical to those in the balanced equation for the reaction.

\(\begin{alignat}{3}

&\ce{2NH3}(g)⇌\:&&\ce{N2}(g)+\:&&\ce{3H2}(g)\\

&−2x &&x &&3x

\end{alignat}\)

The simplest way for us to find the coefficients for the concentration changes in any reaction is to use the coefficients in the balanced chemical equation. The sign of the coefficient is positive when the concentration increases; it is negative when the concentration decreases.

Complete the changes in concentrations for each of the following reactions.

(a) \(\begin{alignat}{3}

&\ce{C2H2}(g)+\:&&\ce{2Br2}(g)⇌\:&&\ce{C2H2Br4}(g)\\

&x &&\underline{\hspace{40px}} &&\underline{\hspace{40px}}

\end{alignat}\)

(b) \(\begin{alignat}{3}

&\ce{I2}(aq)+\:&&\ce{I-}(aq)⇌\:&&\ce{I3-}(aq)\\

&\underline{\hspace{40px}} &&\underline{\hspace{40px}} &&x

\end{alignat}\)

(c) \(\begin{alignat}{3}

&\ce{C3H8}(g)+\:&&\ce{5O2}(g)⇌\:&&\ce{3CO2}(g)+\:&&\ce{4H2O}(g)\\

&x &&\underline{\hspace{40px}} &&\underline{\hspace{40px}} &&\underline{\hspace{40px}}

\end{alignat}\)

###### Solution

(a) \(\begin{alignat}{3}

&\ce{C2H2}(g)+\:&&\ce{2Br2}(g)⇌\:&&\ce{C2H2Br4}(g)\\

&x &&2x &&-x

\end{alignat}\)

(b) \(\begin{alignat}{3}

&\ce{I2}(aq)+\:&&\ce{I-}(aq)⇌\:&&\ce{I3-}(aq)\\

&-x &&-x &&x

\end{alignat}\)

(c) \(\begin{alignat}{3}

&\ce{C3H8}(g)+\:&&\ce{5O2}(g)⇌\:&&\ce{3CO2}(g)+\:&&\ce{4H2O}(g)\\

&x &&5x &&-3x &&-4x

\end{alignat}\)

Complete the changes in concentrations for each of the following reactions:

(a) \(\begin{alignat}{3}

&\ce{2SO2}(g)+\:&&\ce{O2}(g)⇌\:&&\ce{2SO3}(g)\\

&\underline{\hspace{40px}} &&x &&\underline{\hspace{40px}}

\end{alignat}\)

(b) \(\begin{alignat}{3}

&\ce{C4H8}(g)⇌\:&&\ce{2C2H4}(g)\\

&\underline{\hspace{40px}} &&-2x

\end{alignat}\)

(c) \(\begin{alignat}{3}

&\ce{4NH3}(g)+\:&&\ce{7H2O}(g)⇌\:&&\ce{4NO2}(g)+\:&&\ce{6H2O}(g)\\

&\underline{\hspace{40px}} &&\underline{\hspace{40px}} &&\underline{\hspace{40px}} &&\underline{\hspace{40px}}

\end{alignat}\)

**Answer a**-
2

*x*,*x*, −2*x* **Answer b**-
*x*, −2*x* **Answer c**-
4

*x*, 7*x*, −4*x*, −6*x*or −4*x*, −7*x*, 4*x*, 6*x*

### Calculations Involving Equilibrium Concentrations

Because the value of the reaction quotient of any reaction at equilibrium is equal to its equilibrium constant, we can use the mathematical expression for *Q _{c}* (i.e.,

*the law of mass action*) to determine a number of quantities associated with a reaction at equilibrium. It may help if we keep in mind that

*Q*=

_{c}*K*(at equilibrium) in all of these situations and that there are only three basic types of calculations:

_{c}**Calculation of an equilibrium constant**. If concentrations of reactants and products at equilibrium are known, the value of the equilibrium constant for the reaction can be calculated.**Calculation of missing equilibrium concentrations**. If the value of the equilibrium constant and all of the equilibrium concentrations, except one, are known, the remaining concentration can be calculated.**Calculation of equilibrium concentrations from initial concentrations**. If the value of the equilibrium constant and a set of concentrations of reactants and products that are not at equilibrium are known, the concentrations at equilibrium can be calculated.

A similar list could be generated using *Q _{P}*,

*K*, and partial pressure. We will look at solving each of these cases in sequence.

_{P}## Calculation of an Equilibrium Constant

Since the law of mass action is the only equation we have to describe the relationship between *K _{c}* and the concentrations of reactants and products, any problem that requires us to solve for

*K*must provide enough information to determine the reactant and product concentrations at equilibrium. Armed with the concentrations, we can solve the equation for

_{c}*K*, as it will be the only unknown.

_{c}Example \(\PageIndex{1}\) showed us how to determine the equilibrium constant of a reaction if we know the concentrations of reactants and products at equilibrium. The following example shows how to use the stoichiometry of the reaction and a combination of initial concentrations and equilibrium concentrations to determine an equilibrium constant. This technique, commonly called an ICE table—for **I**nitial, **C**hange, and **E**quilibrium–will be helpful in solving many equilibrium problems. A chart is generated beginning with the equilibrium reaction in question. Underneath the reaction the initial concentrations of the reactants and products are listed—these conditions are usually provided in the problem and we consider no shift toward equilibrium to have happened. The next row of data is the change that occurs as the system shifts toward equilibrium—do not forget to consider the reaction stoichiometry as described in a previous section of this chapter. The last row contains the concentrations once equilibrium has been reached.

Iodine molecules react reversibly with iodide ions to produce triiodide ions.

\[\ce{I2}(aq)+\ce{I-}(aq)⇌\ce{I3-}(aq) \nonumber \]

If a solution with the concentrations of I_{2} and I^{−} both equal to 1.000 × 10^{−3} *M* before reaction gives an equilibrium concentration of I_{2} of 6.61 × 10^{−4} *M*, what is the equilibrium constant for the reaction?

###### Solution

We will begin this problem by calculating the changes in concentration as the system goes to equilibrium. Then we determine the equilibrium concentrations and, finally, the equilibrium constant. First, we set up a table with the initial concentrations, the changes in concentrations, and the equilibrium concentrations using −*x* as the change in concentration of I_{2}.

Since the equilibrium concentration of I_{2} is given, we can solve for *x*. At equilibrium the concentration of I_{2} is 6.61 × 10^{−4} *M* so that

\(1.000×10^{−3}−x=6.61×10^{−4}\)

\(x=1.000×10^{−3}−6.61×10^{−4}\)

\(=3.39×10^{−4}\:M\)

Now we can fill in the table with the concentrations at equilibrium.

We now calculate the value of the equilibrium constant.

\(K_c=Q_c=\ce{\dfrac{[I3- ]}{[I2][I- ]}}\)

\(=\dfrac{3.39×10^{−4}\:M}{(6.61×10^{−4}\:M)(6.61×10^{−4}\:M)}=776\)

Ethanol and acetic acid react and form water and ethyl acetate, the solvent responsible for the odor of some nail polish removers.

\(\ce{C2H5OH + CH3CO2H ⇌ CH3CO2C2H5 + H2O}\)

When 1 mol each of C_{2}H_{5}OH and CH_{3}CO_{2}H are allowed to react in 1 L of the solvent dioxane, equilibrium is established when \(\dfrac{1}{3}\) mol of each of the reactants remains. Calculate the equilibrium constant for the reaction. (Note: Water is not a solvent in this reaction.)

**Answer**-
*K*= 4_{c}

### Calculation of a Missing Equilibrium Concentration

If we know the equilibrium constant for a reaction and know the concentrations at equilibrium of all reactants and products except one, we can calculate the missing concentration.

Nitrogen oxides are air pollutants produced by the reaction of nitrogen and oxygen at high temperatures. At 2000 °C, the value of the equilibrium constant for the reaction, \(\ce{N2}(g)+\ce{O2}(g)⇌\ce{2NO}(g)\), is 4.1 × 10^{−4}. Find the concentration of NO(*g*) in an equilibrium mixture with air at 1 atm pressure at this temperature. In air, [N_{2}] = 0.036 mol/L and [O_{2}] 0.0089 mol/L.

###### Solution

We are given all of the equilibrium concentrations except that of NO. Thus, we can solve for the missing equilibrium concentration by rearranging the equation for the equilibrium constant.

\(K_c=Q_c=\ce{\dfrac{[NO]^2}{[N2][O2]}}\)

\(\ce{[NO]^2}=K_c\ce{[N2][O2]}\)

\(\ce{[NO]}=\sqrt{K_c\ce{[N2][O2]}}\)

\(=\sqrt{(4.1×10^{−4})(0.036)(0.0089)}\)

\(=\sqrt{1.31×10^{−7}}\)

\(=3.6×10^{−4}\)

Thus [NO] is 3.6 × 10^{−4} mol/L at equilibrium under these conditions.

We can check our answer by substituting all equilibrium concentrations into the expression for the reaction quotient to see whether it is equal to the equilibrium constant.

\[ \begin{align*} Q_c=\ce{\dfrac{[NO]^2}{[N2][O2]}} \\[4pt] &=\dfrac{(3.6×10^{−4})^2}{(0.036)(0.0089)} \\[4pt] &=4.0×10^{−4}=K_c \end{align*} \nonumber \]

The answer checks; our calculated value gives the equilibrium constant within the error associated with the significant figures in the problem.

The equilibrium constant for the reaction of nitrogen and hydrogen to produce ammonia at a certain temperature is 6.00 × 10^{−2}. Calculate the equilibrium concentration of ammonia if the equilibrium concentrations of nitrogen and hydrogen are 4.26 *M* and 2.09 *M*, respectively.

**Answer**-
1.53 mol/L

### Calculation of Changes in Concentration

If we know the equilibrium constant for a reaction and a set of concentrations of reactants and products that are *not at equilibrium*, we can calculate the changes in concentrations as the system comes to equilibrium, as well as the new concentrations at equilibrium. The typical procedure can be summarized in four steps.

- Determine the direction the reaction proceeds to come to equilibrium.
- Write a balanced chemical equation for the reaction.
- If the direction in which the reaction must proceed to reach equilibrium is not obvious, calculate
*Q*from the initial concentrations and compare to_{c}*K*to determine the direction of change._{c}

- Determine the relative changes needed to reach equilibrium, then write the equilibrium concentrations in terms of these changes.
- Define the changes in the initial concentrations that are needed for the reaction to reach equilibrium. Generally, we represent the smallest change with the symbol
*x*and express the other changes in terms of the smallest change. - Define missing equilibrium concentrations in terms of the initial concentrations and the changes in concentration determined in (a).

- Define the changes in the initial concentrations that are needed for the reaction to reach equilibrium. Generally, we represent the smallest change with the symbol
- Solve for the change and the equilibrium concentrations.
- Substitute the equilibrium concentrations into the expression for the equilibrium constant, solve for
*x*, and check any assumptions used to find*x*. - Calculate the equilibrium concentrations.

- Substitute the equilibrium concentrations into the expression for the equilibrium constant, solve for
- Check the arithmetic.
- Check the calculated equilibrium concentrations by substituting them into the equilibrium expression and determining whether they give the equilibrium constant.

Sometimes a particular step may differ from problem to problem—it may be more complex in some problems and less complex in others. However, every calculation of equilibrium concentrations from a set of initial concentrations will involve these steps.

In solving equilibrium problems that involve changes in concentration, sometimes it is convenient to set up an ICE table, as described in the previous section.

Under certain conditions, the equilibrium constant for the decomposition of PCl_{5}(*g*) into PCl_{3}(*g*) and Cl_{2}(*g*) is 0.0211. What are the equilibrium concentrations of PCl_{5}, PCl_{3}, and Cl_{2} if the initial concentration of PCl_{5} was 1.00 *M*?

###### Solution

Use the stepwise process described earlier.

- The balanced equation for the decomposition of PCl
_{5}is\(\ce{PCl5}(g)⇌\ce{PCl3}(g)+\ce{Cl2}(g)\)

Because we have no products initially, *Q _{c}* = 0 and the reaction will proceed to the right.

- Let us represent the increase in concentration of PCl
_{3}by the symbol*x*. The other changes may be written in terms of*x*by considering the coefficients in the chemical equation.\(\begin{alignat}{3}

&\ce{PCl5}(g)⇌\:&&\ce{PCl3}(g)+\:&&\ce{Cl2}(g)\\

&-x &&x &&x

\end{alignat}\) -
The changes in concentration and the expressions for the equilibrium concentrations are:

- Substituting the equilibrium concentrations into the equilibrium constant equation gives
\(K_c=\ce{\dfrac{[PCl3][Cl2]}{[PCl5]}}=0.0211\)\(=\dfrac{(x)(x)}{(1.00−x)}\)
This equation contains only one variable,

*x*, the change in concentration. We can write the equation as a quadratic equation and solve for*x*using the quadratic formula.\(0.0211=\dfrac{(x)(x)}{(1.00−x)}\)\(0.0211(1.00−x)=x^2\)\(x^2+0.0211x−0.0211=0\)An equation of the form

*ax*^{2}+*bx*+*c*= 0 can be rearranged to solve for*x*:\(x=\dfrac{−b±\sqrt{b^2−4ac}}{2a}\)In this case,

*a*= 1,*b*= 0.0211, and*c*= −0.0211. Substituting the appropriate values for*a*,*b*, and*c*yields:\(x=\dfrac{−0.0211±\sqrt{(0.0211)^2−4(1)(−0.0211)}}{2(1)}\)\(=\dfrac{−0.0211±\sqrt{(4.45×10^{−4})+(8.44×10^{−2})}}{2}\)\(=\dfrac{−0.0211±0.291}{2}\)Hence

\(x=\dfrac{−0.0211+0.291}{2}=0.135\)or

\(x=\dfrac{−0.0211−0.291}{2}=−0.156\)Quadratic equations often have two different solutions, one that is physically possible and one that is physically impossible (an extraneous root). In this case, the second solution (−0.156) is physically impossible because we know the change must be a positive number (otherwise we would end up with negative values for concentrations of the products). Thus,

*x*= 0.135*M*.The equilibrium concentrations are

\(\ce{[PCl5]}=1.00−0.135=0.87\:M\)

\(\ce{[PCl3]}=x=0.135\:M\)

\(\ce{[Cl2]}=x=0.135\:M\) - Substitution into the expression for
*K*(to check the calculation) gives_{c}\(K_c=\ce{\dfrac{[PCl3][Cl2]}{[PCl5]}}=\dfrac{(0.135)(0.135)}{0.87}=0.021\)The equilibrium constant calculated from the equilibrium concentrations is equal to the value of

*K*given in the problem (when rounded to the proper number of significant figures). Thus, the calculated equilibrium concentrations check._{c}

Acetic acid, CH_{3}CO_{2}H, reacts with ethanol, C_{2}H_{5}OH, to form water and ethyl acetate, CH_{3}CO_{2}C_{2}H_{5}.

\[\ce{CH3CO2H + C2H5OH ⇌ CH3CO2C2H5 + H2O} \nonumber \]

The equilibrium constant for this reaction with dioxane as a solvent is 4.0. What are the equilibrium concentrations when a mixture that is 0.15 *M* in CH_{3}CO_{2}H, 0.15 *M* in C_{2}H_{5}OH, 0.40 *M* in CH_{3}CO_{2}C_{2}H_{5}, and 0.40 *M* in H_{2}O are mixed in enough dioxane to make 1.0 L of solution?

**Answer**-
[CH

_{3}CO_{2}H] = 0.36*M*, [C_{2}H_{5}OH] = 0.36*M*, [CH_{3}CO_{2}C_{2}H_{5}] = 0.17*M*, [H_{2}O] = 0.17*M*

A 1.00-L flask is filled with 1.00 moles of H_{2} and 2.00 moles of I_{2}. The value of the equilibrium constant for the reaction of hydrogen and iodine reacting to form hydrogen iodide is 50.5 under the given conditions. What are the equilibrium concentrations of H_{2}, I_{2}, and HI in moles/L?

\[\ce{H2}(g)+\ce{I2}(g)\rightleftharpoons\ce{2HI}(g) \nonumber \]

**Answer**-
[H

_{2}] = 0.06*M*, [I_{2}] = 1.06*M*, [HI] = 1.88*M*

Sometimes it is possible to use chemical insight to find solutions to equilibrium problems without actually solving a quadratic (or more complicated) equation. First, however, it is useful to verify that equilibrium can be obtained starting from two extremes: all (or mostly) reactants and all (or mostly) products.

Consider the ionization of 0.150 M HA, a weak acid.

The most obvious way to determine the equilibrium concentrations would be to start with only reactants. This could be called the “all reactant” starting point. Using *x* for the amount of acid ionized at equilibrium, this is the ICE table and solution.

Setting up and solving the quadratic equation gives

Using the positive (physical) root, the equilibrium concentrations are

A less obvious way to solve the problem would be to assume all the HA ionizes first, then the system comes to equilibrium. This could be called the “all product” starting point. Assuming all of the HA ionizes gives

Using these as initial concentrations and “*y*” to represent the concentration of HA at equilibrium, this is the ICE table for this starting point.

Setting up and solving the quadratic equation gives

Retain a few extra significant figures to minimize rounding problems.

Rounding each solution to three significant figures gives

Using the physically significant root (0.140 M) gives the equilibrium concentrations as

Thus, the two approaches give the same results (to three *decimal places*), and show that *both* starting points lead to the same equilibrium conditions. The “all reactant” starting point resulted in a relatively small change (*x*) because the system was close to equilibrium, while the “all product” starting point had a relatively large change (*y*) that was nearly the size of the initial concentrations. It can be said that a system that starts “close” to equilibrium will require only a ”small” change in conditions (*x*) to reach equilibrium.

Recall that a small *K _{c}* means that very little of the reactants form products and a large

*K*means that most of the reactants form products. If the system can be arranged so it starts “close” to equilibrium, then if the change (

_{c}*x*) is small compared to any initial concentrations, it can be neglected. Small is usually defined as resulting in an error of less than 5%. The following two examples demonstrate this.

What are the concentrations at equilibrium of a 0.15 *M* solution of HCN?

\[\ce{HCN}(aq)⇌\ce{H+}(aq)+\ce{CN-}(aq) \hspace{20px} K_c=4.9×10^{−10} \nonumber \]

###### Solution

Using “*x*” to represent the concentration of each product at equilibrium gives this ICE table.

The exact solution may be obtained using the quadratic formula with

\[K_c=\dfrac{(x)(x)}{0.15−x} \nonumber \]

solving

\[x^2+4.9×10^{−10}−7.35×10^{−11}=0 \nonumber \]

\[x=8.56×10^{−6}\:M\textrm{ (3 sig. figs.)}=8.6×10^{−6}\:M\textrm{ (2 sig. figs.)} \nonumber \]

Thus [H^{+}] = [CN^{–}] = *x* = 8.6 × 10^{–6} *M* and [HCN] = 0.15 – *x* = 0.15 *M*.

In this case, chemical intuition can provide a simpler solution. From the equilibrium constant and the initial conditions, *x* must be small compared to 0.15 *M*. More formally, if \(x≪0.15\), then 0.15 – *x* ≈ 0.15. If this assumption is true, then it simplifies obtaining *x*

\[K_c=\dfrac{(x)(x)}{0.15−x}≈\dfrac{x^2}{0.15} \nonumber \]

\[4.9×10^{−10}=\dfrac{x^2}{0.15} \nonumber \]

\[x^2=(0.15)(4.9×10^{−10})=7.4×10^{−11} \nonumber \]

\[x=\sqrt{7.4×10^{−11}}=8.6×10^{−6}\:M \nonumber \]

In this example, solving the exact (quadratic) equation and using approximations gave the same result to two significant figures. While most of the time the approximation is a bit different from the exact solution, as long as the error is less than 5%, the approximate solution is considered valid. In this problem, the 5% applies to IF (0.15 – *x*) ≈ 0.15 *M*, so if

\[\dfrac{x}{0.15}×100\%=\dfrac{8.6×10^{−6}}{0.15}×100\%=0.006\% \nonumber \]

is less than 5%, as it is in this case, the assumption is valid. The approximate solution is thus a valid solution.

What are the equilibrium concentrations in a 0.25 *M* NH_{3} solution?

Assume that *x* is much less than 0.25 M and calculate the error in your assumption.

**Answer**-
\(\ce{[OH- ]}=\ce{[NH4+]}=0.0021\:M\); [NH

_{3}] = 0.25*M*, error = 0.84%

The second example requires that the original information be processed a bit, but it still can be solved using a small *x* approximation.

Copper(II) ions form a complex ion in the presence of ammonia

\[\ce{Cu^2+}(aq)+\ce{4NH3}(aq)⇌\ce{Cu(NH3)4^2+}(aq) \hspace{20px} K_c=5.0×10^{13}=\ce{\dfrac{[Cu(NH3)4^2+]}{[Cu^2+(aq)][NH3]^4}} \nonumber \]

If 0.010 mol Cu^{2}^{+} is added to 1.00 L of a solution that is 1.00 *M* NH_{3} what are the concentrations when the system comes to equilibrium?

Solution The initial concentration of copper(II) is 0.010 *M*. The equilibrium constant is very large so it would be better to start with as much product as possible because “all products” is much closer to equilibrium than “all reactants.” Note that Cu^{2}^{+} is the limiting reactant; if all 0.010 *M* of it reacts to form product the concentrations would be

\[\ce{[Cu^2+]}=0.010−0.010=0\:M \nonumber \]

\[\ce{[Cu(NH3)4^2+]}=0.010\:M \nonumber \]

\[\ce{[NH3]}=1.00−4×0.010=0.96\:M \nonumber \]

Using these “shifted” values as initial concentrations with *x* as the free copper(II) ion concentration at equilibrium gives this ICE table.

Since we are starting close to equilibrium, *x* should be small so that

Select the smallest concentration for the 5% rule.

This is much less than 5%, so the assumptions are valid. The concentrations at equilibrium are

By starting with the maximum amount of product, this system was near equilibrium and the change (*x*) was very small. With only a small change required to get to equilibrium, the equation for *x* was greatly simplified and gave a valid result well within the 5% error maximum.

What are the equilibrium concentrations when 0.25 mol Ni^{2}^{+} is added to 1.00 L of 2.00 *M* NH_{3} solution?

\[\ce{Ni^2+}(aq)+\ce{6NH3}(aq)⇌\ce{Ni(NH3)6^2+}(aq) \nonumber \]

with \(K_c=5.5×10^8\).With such a large equilibrium constant, first form as much product as possible, then assume that only a small amount (*x*) of the product shifts left. Calculate the error in your assumption.

**Answer**-
\(\ce{[Ni(NH3)6^2+]}=0.25\:M\), [NH

_{3}] = 0.50*M*, [Ni^{2}^{+}] = 2.9 × 10^{–8}*M*, error = 1.2 × 10^{–5}%

## Summary

The ratios of the rate of change in concentrations of a reaction are equal to the ratios of the coefficients in the balanced chemical equation. The sign of the coefficient of X is positive when the concentration increases and negative when it decreases. We learned to approach three basic types of equilibrium problems. When given the concentrations of the reactants and products at equilibrium, we can solve for the equilibrium constant; when given the equilibrium constant and some of the concentrations involved, we can solve for the missing concentrations; and when given the equilibrium constant and the initial concentrations, we can solve for the concentrations at equilibrium.