# 6.2: Counting Nails by the Pound

- Page ID
- 47487

### Counting by Weighing and Avogadro's number

The size of molecule is so small that it is physically difficult if not impossible to directly count out molecules (Figure \(\PageIndex{1}\)). However, we can count them indirectly by using a common trick of "counting by weighing".

**Figure \(\PageIndex{1}\):** A comparison of the scales of various biological and technological objects. Image used with permission (CC BY-SA 3.0; Wikipedia)

Consider the example of counting nails in a big box at a hardware store. You need to estimate the number of nails in a box. The weight of an empty box is \(213 \,g\) and the weight of the box plus a bunch of big nails is \(1340\, g\). Let's assume we know that the weight of one big nail is 0.450 g. I hope you aren't going to tear open the package and count the nails. We agree that

\[\text{mass of big nails} = 1340\, g - 213\, g = 1227 \,g\]

Therefore

\[\text{Number of big nails in box} = \dfrac{1227\, g}{0.450\, g/ \text{big nail}} = 2,726.6\, \text{big nails} = 2,730 \,\text{big nails}. \label{eq2}\]

You have just counted the number of big nails in the box by weighing them (rather than counting them individually).

**Figure \(\PageIndex{2}\):** Galvanized nails. Individually counting nails in a box would would require significant effort. Alternatively, we can cound them by weighing. Image used with permission (Public Domain; Wikipedia).

Now consider if the box of nails weighed the same, but box were filled with small nails with an individual mass of \(0.23\, g/\text{small nail}\) instead? You would do the same math, but use a different denominator in Equation \ref{eq2}:

\[\text{Number of small nails in box} = \dfrac{1227\, g}{0.230\, g/\text{small nail}} = 5,334.7\, \text{small nails} = 5,335 \, \text{small nails}. \label{eq3}\]

The individual mass is the conversion factor used the calculation and changes based on the nature of the nail (big or small). Let's ask ask a different question? How many *dozens *of nails are their in that same box of small nails described above.

If we knew the information from in Equation \ref{eq3}, we can just use the conversion of how many nails is in a dozen

\[\dfrac{5,335 \,\text{small nails} }{12 \text{small nails/dozen}} = 444.6 \,\text{dozen small nails} \label{eq4}\]

If we wanted to get this value from weighing we use the "dozen mass" instead of individual mass of

\[12 \times 0.23 g = 2.76\, g/\text{dozen small nails}. \label{eq5}\]

So following Equation \ref{eq3} we get

\[\text{Number of dozens of small nails} = \dfrac{1227\, g}{2.76\, g/\text{dozen small nails}} = 444.6 \,\text{dozen small nails} \label{eq6}\]

and this is the same result as from Equation \ref{eq4}. These calculations demonstrate the difference between individual mass (i.e., per individual) and collective mass (e.g., per dozen or per gross). The collective mass of most importance to chemistry is *molar mass* (i.e., mass per mole or mass per \(6.022 \times 10^{23}\)).

Avogadro's Number

Avogadro's number is an accident of nature. It is the number of particles that delivers a mole of a substance. Avogadro's number = \(6.022 \times 10^{23}\). The reason why the value is an accident of nature is that the mole is tied to the gram mass unit. The gram is a convenient mass unit because it matches human sizes. If we were a thousand times greater in size ( like Paul Bunyan) we would find it handy to use kilogram amounts. This means the kilogram mole would be convenient. The number of particles handled in a kilogram mole is 1000 times greater. The kilo Avogadro number for the count of particles in a kilomole is \(6.022 \times 10^{26}\).

If humans were tiny creatures (like Lilliputians) only 1/1000 our present size, milligrams would be more convenient. This means the milligram mole would be more useful. The number of particles handled in a milligram mole (millimole) would be 1/1000 times smaller. The milli Avogadro number for the count of particles in a millimole is \(6.022 \times 10^{20}\).

What do you think would happen to Avogadro's number if the American system was used and amounts were measured in pound moles? Remember 1 pound = 454 grams. Avogadro's number would be larger by a factor of 454. A pound mole of hydrogen would weigh 1 pound which would be 454 grams. A gram mole of hydrogen weighs 1 gram and contains \(6.022 \times 10^{23}\) H atoms.

### Molar Mass for Elements

You are able to read the periodic table and determine the average atomic mass for an element like carbon. The average mass is 12.01 amu. This mass is a ridiculously tiny number of grams. It is too small to handle normally. The molar mass of carbon is defined as the mass in grams that is numerically equal to the average atomic weight. This means

\[1 g/ mole carbon = 12.01 \,g \,carbon\]

this is commonly written

\[1\, mol\, carbon = 12.01\, grams\, carbon.\]

This is the mass of carbon that contains \(6.022 \times 10^{23}\) carbon atoms.

Avogadro's number is \(6.022 \times 10^{23}\) particles.

This same process gives us the molar mass of any element. For example

- \(1\, mol\, neon = 20.18\, g\, neon\, Ne\)
- \(1 \,mol\, sodium = 22.99\, g \,sodium\, Na\)

### Molar Mass for Compounds

Example \(\PageIndex{1}\): molar mass of Water

The formulas for compounds are familiar to you. You know the formula for water is \(\ce{H2O}\). It should be reasonable that the weight of a formula unit can be calculated by adding up the weights for the atoms in the formula.

**Solution**

The formula weight for water

weight from hydrogen + weight from oxygen

The formula weight for water

2 H atoms x 1.008 amu + 1 O atom x 16.00 amu = 18.016 amu

The molar mass for water

18.016 grams water or 18 grams to the nearest gram

Example \(\PageIndex{2}\): molar mass of Methane

The formula for methane the major component in natural gas is \(\ce{CH4}\).

**Solution**

The formula weight for methane

weight from hydrogen + weight from carbon

The formula weight for methane

4 H atoms x 1.008 amu + 1 C atom x 12.01 amu = 16.04 amu

The molar mass for methane

16.04 grams per mole of methane

Example \(\PageIndex{3}\): Molar Mass of Ethyl Chloride

What is its molar mass for ethyl chloride \(\ce{CH3CH2Cl}\)?

**Solution**

The *formula weight*

weight from hydrogen + weight from carbon + weight from chlorine

The formula weight

5 H atoms x 1.008 amu + 2 C atom x 12.01 amu + 35.5 amu = 64.5 amu

The molar mass for ethyl chloride

64.5 grams per mole of ethyl chloride

Example \(\PageIndex{4}\): Sulfur Dioxide

What is the molar mass for sulfur dioxide, \(\ce{SO2 (g)}\), a gas using in bleaching and disinfection processes?

**Solution**

Look up the atomic weight for each of the elements in the formula.

- 1 sulfur atom = 32. 07 amu
- 1 oxygen atom = 16.00 amu

Count the atoms of each element in the formula unit. .

- one sulfur atom
- two oxygen atoms

The formula weight

weight from sulfur + weight from oxygen

The formula weight

1 sulfur atom x (32. 07 amu ) + 2 oxygen atoms x (16.00 amu)

The formula weight

\(\ce{SO2}\) = 32. 07 amu + 32.00 amu = 64.07 amu = 64 amu \(\ce{SO2}\)

The molar mass for \(\ce{SO2}\) is

64.07 grams of \(\ce{SO2}\); 1 mol \(\ce{SO2}\) = 64 grams per mole of \(\ce{SO2}\)

Exercise \(\PageIndex{1}\)

What is the formula weight and molar mass for alum, \(\ce{KAl(SO4)2 • 12 H2O}\) ?

**Answer**-
1. Check the periodic table for the atomic masses for each atom in the formula

2. Count the number of each type of atom in formula.

3. Multiply the number of atoms by the atomic mass for each element.

4. Add up the masses for all of the elements.

element average atomic mass number of atoms in formula rounded to nearest one unit for simplicity potassium k 39.1 amu 1 = 39. amu aluminum 26.98 amu 1 27. amu sulfur 32.07 amu 2 64. amu oxygen 16.00 amu 8 + 12 = 20 320. amu hydrogen 1.008 amu 2 x 12 = 24 24. amu 474. amu This is the formula weight. Molar mass is 474 grams. This is a mass in grams that is numerically (474) the same as the formula weight.

1 mole alum \(\ce{KAl(SO4)2• 12 H2O}\) = 474 grams alum \(\ce{KAl(SO4)2• 12 H2O}\)