Skip to main content
Chemistry LibreTexts

7.2: Electrophilic Additions to Conjugated Dienes- Allylic Carbocations

  • Page ID
    469406
  • \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    ( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)

    \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)

    \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorA}[1]{\vec{#1}}      % arrow\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorAt}[1]{\vec{\text{#1}}}      % arrow\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorB}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorC}[1]{\textbf{#1}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorD}[1]{\overrightarrow{#1}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorDt}[1]{\overrightarrow{\text{#1}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectE}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{\mathbf {#1}}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)

    Earlier, we saw that electrophilic addition to a simple alkene would follow Markovnikov’s rule. Markovnikov's rule states that for the electrophilic addition of HX, the carbocation intermediate forms on the double bond carbon with the greatest number of alkyl substitutents. Because the stability of carbocation intermediates increases as it number of alky groups increases (primary < secondary < tertiary), this regioselectivity is provided by preferably forming a more stable carbocation intermediate during the reaction. During the electrophilic addition of HBr to 2-methylpropene, the more stable tertiary carbocation intermediate is preferably formed which yields the Markovnikov addition product 2-bromo-2-methylpropane. Formation of 1-bromo-2-methylpropane does not occur because it would require the formation of a less stable primary carbocation intermediate.

    Example 1.png

    When an electrophilic addition is performed on a non-conjugated diene, the double bonds react in much the same manner as individual alkenes. During the addition of two equivalents of HBr to 1,4-pentadiene, a non-conjugated diene, Markovnikov's rule is still followed producing 2,4-dibromopentane as the product.

    Example 2.svg

    Conjugated dienes undergo the usual reactions of alkenes, such as catalytic hydrogenation, radical additions, and electrophilic additions more readily than most alkenes or dienes that have isolated double bonds. During the electrophilic addition of one equivalent of HX to a conjugated diene, the expected Markovnikov addition product is formed during a process called 1,2-addition. In addition, an unexpected product is formed from 1,4-addition, i.e. the halogen bonds at the terminal carbon atoms of a conjugated diene and the remaining double bond shifts to the 2,3-location. Note, the numbers (1 and 4) refer to which of the four carbons making up the conjugated diene the H and Br are bonded to in the products and are not used for the compounds IUPAC nomenclature. Although there are various methods for effecting the relative ratio of 1,2 and 1,4 addition products during the electrophilic addition to a conjugated diene, a mixture of these products is almost always produced. When one equivalent HBr undergoes electrophilic addition to 1,3-butadiene, 1,2 addition provides the expected Markovnikov product 3-bromo-1-butene in a 70% yield. This process is called a 1,2 addition because the hydrogen from HBr (labeled blue) bonds to the first carbon of the diene and the bromine from HBr bonds to the second carbon of the diene. The compound 1-bromo-2-butene is also produced in a 30% yield during the reaction as product of 1,4 addition. Here the hydrogen of HBr bonds to the first carbon of the diene and the Br bonds to the fourth carbon of the diene.

    Example 3.png

    The Mechanism for Electrophilic Addition of HBr to a Conjugated Diene

    Regardless if the 1,2 or 1,4 addition product is formed, the first step of the mechanism is the protonation of one of the double bonds. In the same manner as the electrophilic addition of HX to an alkene, the protonation occurs regioselectively to give the more stable carbocation. In the case of a conjugated diene, the more stable cation is not only secondary, but also allylic, and therefore enjoys the stabilization created from the positive charge being distributed over two carbons by resonance. The resonance hybrid of the allylic carbocation intermediate can be depicted by two resonance forms (shown below) both of which have a full positive charge.

    Step 1)

    Mechansim Step 1.png

    Step 2)X

    This allylic carbocation, more properly denoted as the resonance hybrid shown below, has two carbons which have significant positive charge. The halide ion can attack either carbon. Attacking the central carbon, adjacent to the site of protonation, leads to the the 1,2-addition product. Attacking the terminal carbon, distant from the site of protonation, leads to the 1,4 addition product.

    Mechanism step 2.png

    Other Electrophilic Additions

    Formation of both 1,2- and 1,4-addition products occurs not only with hydrogen halides, but also with other electrophiles such as the halogens (X2). The electrophilic addition of bromine to 1,3-butadiene is an example. As shown below, a roughly 50:50 mixture of 3,4-dibromo-1-butene (the expected 1,2 addition product) and 1,4-dibromo-2-butene (the 1,4 addition product) is obtained. The double bond of the 1,4 addition product is primarily formed as the (E) isomer.


    Example 4.png

    Worked Example \(\PageIndex{1}\)

    Give the expected products from the following reaction. Show both 1,2 and 1,4 addition products.

    Worked Example 1.png

    Solution

    For this example the two double bonds in the diene are not equivalent and must be considered separately. Each double bond of the reactant has the possibility of forming a 1,2 and a 1,4 addition product so the reaction has the possibility of forming four product. Protonate each double bond separately and draw out the resonance forms of the allylic carbocation intermediate created. Then react each resonance form with Br- to create the two possible products. Repeat this process with the second double bond to create the four possible product. Lastly, look for symmetry in the products to see if any are same molecule. Also, consider the stability of each carbocation created during this process. The most stable carbocation will generally product the favored product of the reaction.

    Addition to the first double bond creates a resonance form with a tertiary carbocation intermediate. Due to the stability of the tertiary carbocation this product will most likely go one to be the preferred product of this reaction.

    Worked Example2.png

    Addition to the second double bond creates a symmetrical compound so only one product is formed.

    Worked Example3.png

    Over the reaction proposed would be expected to form three products.

    Worked Example 4.png


    7.2: Electrophilic Additions to Conjugated Dienes- Allylic Carbocations is shared under a CC BY-SA 4.0 license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by Steven Farmer, Dietmar Kennepohl, John Roberts, Marjorie C. Caserio, & Marjorie C. Caserio.