1.14.36: Irreversible Thermodynamics
- Page ID
- 387084
\( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)
\( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)
\( \newcommand{\dsum}{\displaystyle\sum\limits} \)
\( \newcommand{\dint}{\displaystyle\int\limits} \)
\( \newcommand{\dlim}{\displaystyle\lim\limits} \)
\( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)
( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)
\( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)
\( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)
\( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)
\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)
\( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\)
\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)
\( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)
\( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)
\( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\)
\( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)
\( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\)
\( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)
\( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)
\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)
\( \newcommand{\vectorA}[1]{\vec{#1}} % arrow\)
\( \newcommand{\vectorAt}[1]{\vec{\text{#1}}} % arrow\)
\( \newcommand{\vectorB}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)
\( \newcommand{\vectorC}[1]{\textbf{#1}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vectorD}[1]{\overrightarrow{#1}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vectorDt}[1]{\overrightarrow{\text{#1}}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vectE}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{\mathbf {#1}}}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)
\(\newcommand{\longvect}{\overrightarrow}\)
\( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)
\(\newcommand{\ket}[1]{\left| #1 \right>}\)
\(\newcommand{\bra}[1]{\left< #1 \right|}\)
\(\newcommand{\braket}[2]{\left< #1 \vphantom{#2} \right| \left. #2 \vphantom{#1} \right>}\)
\(\newcommand{\braopket}[3]{\left< #1 \vphantom{#2}\vphantom{#3} \right| #2 \vphantom{#1}\vphantom{#3} \left| #3 \vphantom{#1}\vphantom{#2} \right>}\)
\(\newcommand{\qmvec}[1]{\mathbf{\vec{#1}}}\)
\(\newcommand{\op}[1]{\hat{\mathbf{#1}}}\)
\(\newcommand{\expect}[1]{\langle #1 \rangle}\)
\(\newcommand{\dfn}[1]{\emph{\textbf{#1}}}\)
According to the Second Law of Thermodynamics, the change in entropy \(\mathrm{dS}\) is related to the affinity for spontaneous change \(\mathrm{A}\) using equation (a).
\[\mathrm{dS}=(\mathrm{q} / \mathrm{T})+(\mathrm{A} / \mathrm{T}) \, \mathrm{d} \xi ; \quad \mathrm{A} \, \mathrm{d} \xi \geq 0 \nonumber \]
In these terms chemists usually have in mind a chemical reaction driven by the affinity \(\mathrm{A}\) for spontaneous chemical reaction producing extent of reaction \(\mathrm{d}\xi\). We generalize the law in the following terms.
\[\mathrm{dS}=(\mathrm{q} / \mathrm{T})+\mathrm{d}_{\mathrm{i}} \mathrm{S} ; \quad \mathrm{d}_{\mathrm{i}} \mathrm{S} \geq 0 \nonumber \]
\(\mathrm{d}_{\mathrm{i}\mathrm{S}}\) is the change in entropy of the system by virtue of spontaneous processes in the system. Comparison of equations (a) and (b) yields the following equation.
\[\mathrm{T} \, \mathrm{d}_{\mathrm{i}} \mathrm{S}=\mathrm{A} \, \mathrm{d} \xi \geq 0 \nonumber \]
We introduce two new terms. A quantity \(\mathrm{P}[\mathrm{S}]\) describes the rate of entropy production within the system; a quantity \(\sigma[\mathrm{S}]\) describes the corresponding rate of entropy production in unit volume of the system.
\[\mathrm{P}[\mathrm{S}]=\mathrm{d}_{\mathrm{i}} \mathrm{S} / \mathrm{dt}=\int_{\mathrm{V}} \sigma[\mathrm{S}] \, \mathrm{dV} \geq 0 \nonumber \]
We combine equations (c) and (d).
\[\mathrm{P}[\mathrm{S}]=\frac{\mathrm{d}_{\mathrm{i}} \mathrm{S}}{\mathrm{dt}}=\frac{\mathrm{A}}{\mathrm{T}} \, \frac{\mathrm{d} \xi}{\mathrm{dt}} \geq 0 \nonumber \]
But if \(\mathrm{dn}_{j}\) is the change in amount of chemical substance \(j\) in the system, \(\mathrm{dn} \mathrm{j}_{\mathrm{j}}=\mathrm{v}_{\mathrm{j}} \, \mathrm{d} \xi\). Then,
\[P[S]=\frac{d_{i} S}{d t}=\frac{A}{T} \, \frac{1}{v_{j}} \, \frac{d n_{j}}{d t} \geq 0 \nonumber \]
We develop this equation into a form which has wider significance. We assume that the system is homogeneous such that for a system volume \(\mathrm{V}\),
\[\sigma[S]=P[S] / V \nonumber \]
Then
\[\sigma[\mathrm{S}]=\frac{1}{\mathrm{~V}} \, \frac{\mathrm{d}_{\mathrm{i}} \mathrm{S}}{\mathrm{dt}}=\frac{\mathrm{A}}{\mathrm{T}} \, \frac{1}{\mathrm{v}_{\mathrm{j}}} \, \frac{1}{\mathrm{~V}} \, \frac{\mathrm{dn}_{\mathrm{j}}}{\mathrm{dt}} \geq 0 \nonumber \]
But the concentration of chemical substance \(j\), \(\mathrm{c}_{\mathrm{j}}=\mathrm{n}_{\mathrm{j}} / \mathrm{V}\). Then, \(\mathrm{dc}_{\mathrm{j}}=\mathrm{dn}_{\mathrm{j}} / \mathrm{V}\). Hence from equation (h),
\[\sigma[S]=\frac{\mathrm{A}}{\mathrm{T}} \, \frac{1}{\mathrm{v}_{\mathrm{j}}} \, \frac{\mathrm{dc}_{\mathrm{j}}}{\mathrm{dt}} \geq 0 \nonumber \]
The quantity \(\left(1 / v_{j}\right) \, d c_{j} / d t\) describes the change in composition of the system, the flow of the system from reactants to products. In these terms we identify a chemical flow, \(\mathrm{J}_{\mathrm{ch}}\).
\[\mathrm{J}_{\mathrm{ch}}=\left(\mathrm{l} / \mathrm{v}_{\mathrm{j}}\right) \, \mathrm{dc}_{\mathrm{j}} / \mathrm{dt} \nonumber \]
Then,
\[\sigma[S]=(A / T) \, J_{c h} \geq 0 \nonumber \]
Or,
\[\mathrm{T} \, \sigma[\mathrm{S}]=\mathrm{A} \, \mathrm{J}_{\mathrm{ch}} \geq 0 \nonumber \]
The latter equation has an interesting feature; \(\mathrm{T} \, \sigma[\mathrm{S}]\) is given by the product of the affinity for spontaneous chemical reaction (the driving force) and the accompanying flow. Indeed \(\mathrm{T} \, \sigma[\mathrm{S}]\) is related to the rate of entropy production in the system. Thermodynamics takes us no further. We make an extrathermodynamic leap and suggest that the flow is proportional to the force; i.e. the stronger the driving force the more rapid the chemical flow from reactants to products.
In general terms phenomenological equations start out from the basis of a linear model described by a phenomenological law of the general form, \(\mathrm{J} = \mathrm{L} \, \(\mathrm{~X}\) where \(\mathrm{J}\) is the flow and \(\mathrm{X}\) is the conjugate force such that the product \(\mathrm{J} \, \mathrm{~X}\) yields the rate of entropy production. These laws are based on experiment. Many such phenomenological laws have been proposed. Some examples are listed below.
- Phenomenon--- Electrical Conductivity Law: Ohm’s Law (discovered 1826)
\(\mathrm{I}=\mathrm{L} \, \mathrm{V}\) where \(\mathrm{L} =\) conductance; resistance \(\mathrm{R} = 1/\mathrm{L}\). - Phenomenon--- Diffusion Law: Fick’s Law discovered by Adolf Fick 1855
\(\mathrm{J}_{\mathrm{j}}=\mathrm{D} \,\left(-\mathrm{d} \mu_{\mathrm{j}} / \mathrm{dx}\right)\) - Phenomenon— Thermal conductivity Law : Fourier’s Law (1822)
\(\mathrm{J}_{\mathrm{q}}=\lambda \,(-\mathrm{dT} / \mathrm{dx})\) \(\lambda =\) thermal conductivity - Phenomenon—Chemical reaction If the patterns described above were followed we might write,
\(J_{c h}=L \, A\)
In 1890 Nernst suggested this approach to chemical kinetics. Unfortunately chemists have no method for measuring the affinity; there is no affinity meter. Instead chemists use the Law of Mass Action.


