Skip to main content
Chemistry LibreTexts

Extra Credit 49

  • Page ID
    82809
  • \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    ( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)

    \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)

    \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorA}[1]{\vec{#1}}      % arrow\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorAt}[1]{\vec{\text{#1}}}      % arrow\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorB}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorC}[1]{\textbf{#1}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorD}[1]{\overrightarrow{#1}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorDt}[1]{\overrightarrow{\text{#1}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectE}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{\mathbf {#1}}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)

    \(\newcommand{\avec}{\mathbf a}\) \(\newcommand{\bvec}{\mathbf b}\) \(\newcommand{\cvec}{\mathbf c}\) \(\newcommand{\dvec}{\mathbf d}\) \(\newcommand{\dtil}{\widetilde{\mathbf d}}\) \(\newcommand{\evec}{\mathbf e}\) \(\newcommand{\fvec}{\mathbf f}\) \(\newcommand{\nvec}{\mathbf n}\) \(\newcommand{\pvec}{\mathbf p}\) \(\newcommand{\qvec}{\mathbf q}\) \(\newcommand{\svec}{\mathbf s}\) \(\newcommand{\tvec}{\mathbf t}\) \(\newcommand{\uvec}{\mathbf u}\) \(\newcommand{\vvec}{\mathbf v}\) \(\newcommand{\wvec}{\mathbf w}\) \(\newcommand{\xvec}{\mathbf x}\) \(\newcommand{\yvec}{\mathbf y}\) \(\newcommand{\zvec}{\mathbf z}\) \(\newcommand{\rvec}{\mathbf r}\) \(\newcommand{\mvec}{\mathbf m}\) \(\newcommand{\zerovec}{\mathbf 0}\) \(\newcommand{\onevec}{\mathbf 1}\) \(\newcommand{\real}{\mathbb R}\) \(\newcommand{\twovec}[2]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\ctwovec}[2]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\threevec}[3]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cthreevec}[3]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\fourvec}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cfourvec}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\fivevec}[5]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \\ #5 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cfivevec}[5]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \\ #5 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\mattwo}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{rr}#1 \amp #2 \\ #3 \amp #4 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\laspan}[1]{\text{Span}\{#1\}}\) \(\newcommand{\bcal}{\cal B}\) \(\newcommand{\ccal}{\cal C}\) \(\newcommand{\scal}{\cal S}\) \(\newcommand{\wcal}{\cal W}\) \(\newcommand{\ecal}{\cal E}\) \(\newcommand{\coords}[2]{\left\{#1\right\}_{#2}}\) \(\newcommand{\gray}[1]{\color{gray}{#1}}\) \(\newcommand{\lgray}[1]{\color{lightgray}{#1}}\) \(\newcommand{\rank}{\operatorname{rank}}\) \(\newcommand{\row}{\text{Row}}\) \(\newcommand{\col}{\text{Col}}\) \(\renewcommand{\row}{\text{Row}}\) \(\newcommand{\nul}{\text{Nul}}\) \(\newcommand{\var}{\text{Var}}\) \(\newcommand{\corr}{\text{corr}}\) \(\newcommand{\len}[1]{\left|#1\right|}\) \(\newcommand{\bbar}{\overline{\bvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\bhat}{\widehat{\bvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\bperp}{\bvec^\perp}\) \(\newcommand{\xhat}{\widehat{\xvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\vhat}{\widehat{\vvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\uhat}{\widehat{\uvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\what}{\widehat{\wvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\Sighat}{\widehat{\Sigma}}\) \(\newcommand{\lt}{<}\) \(\newcommand{\gt}{>}\) \(\newcommand{\amp}{&}\) \(\definecolor{fillinmathshade}{gray}{0.9}\)

    Q 17.7.3

    How long would it take to reduce 1 mole of each of the following ions using the current indicated? Assume the voltage is sufficient to perform the reduction.

    1. Al3+, 1.234 A
    2. Ca2+, 22.2 A
    3. Cr5+, 37.45 A
    4. Au3+, 3.57 A

    SOLUTION

    Using the equation n=It/F we can determine the time taken to reduce 1 mole of each ion, where n is the number of moles of electrons, I is the current in Amps, t is the time in seconds, and F is Faraday's constant (~ 96500 Coulombs/mol). For convenience, 1 Coulomb = Amp x sec. Because we are trying to find the time is takes to reduce the ions, we can rewrite the equation as follows:

    $$n_{e}=\frac{It}{F}$$

    $$t=\frac{n_{e}F}{I}$$

    1. 1 mol Al3+ x (3 mol e-/1 mol Al3+) = 3 mol e-

    $$t=\frac{(3mole^{-})(96,485Cmol^{-1}e^{-1})}{1.234A}$$

    $$t=\frac{(289600 A s)}{1.234A}$$

    $$t=\frac{(234602.92 sec)(1 min)}{60 sec} = 3910.05 min$$

    It will take 3910.05 minutes to reduce 1 mole of Al3+ at 1.234 Amps.

    2. 1 mol Ca2+ x (2 mol e- / 1 mol Ca2+) = 2 mol e-

    $$t=\frac{(2mole^{-})(96,485Cmol^{-1}e^{-1})}{22.2A}$$

    $$t=\frac{(193000 A s)}{22.2 A}$$

    $$t=\frac{(8693.69 sec)(1 min)}{60 sec} = 3144.89 min$$

    It will take 144.89 minutes to reduce 1 mole of Ca2+ at 22.2 Amps.

    3. 1 mol Cr5+ x (5 mol e- / 1 mol Cr5+) = 5 mol e-

    $$t=\frac{(5mole^{-})(96,485Cmol^{-1}e^{-1})}{37.45A} $$

    $$t=\frac{(482500 A s)}{37.45 A}$$

    $$t=\frac{(2883.84 sec)(1 min)}{60 sec} = 214.73 min$$

    It would take 214.73 minutes to reduce 1 mole of Cr5+ at 37.45 Amps.

    4. 1 mol Au3+ x (3 mol e- / 1 mol Au3+) = 3 mol e-

    t=\frac{(3mole^{-})(96,485Cmol^{-1}e^{-1})}{3.57A}

    $$t=\frac{(289500 A s)}{3.57 A}$$

    $$t=\frac{(81092.44 sec)(1 min)}{60 sec} = 1351.54 min$$

    It would take 1352.54 minutes to reduce 1 mole of Au3+at 3.57 Amps.

    Payal: All solutions are correct and now in mathjax form.

    Q12.3.12

    Under certain conditions the decomposition of ammonia on a metal surface gives the following data:

    [NH3] (M) 1.0 × 10−3 2.0 × 10−3 3.0 × 10−3
    Rate (mol/L/h1) 1.5 × 10−6 1.5 × 10−6 1.5 × 10−6

    Determine the rate equation, the rate constant, and the overall order for this reaction.

    SOLUTION

    rate = k[NH3], From the Table, we can see that the rate is constant despite the concentration of ammonia changing, so the rate must be independent of concentration, which means that it is a first order reaction.

    k, the rate constant, can be found by plugging in some of the values from the table. Let's use the first concentration and the first rate to find the rate constant, k.

    $$1.5x10^{-6}= k[1.0x10^{-3}]^{0} $$

    $$1.5x10^{-6}\frac{M}{s}=k$$

    $k=1.5x10^{-6}\frac{M}{s}​​​​​​​$, therefore we can write the rate equation as follows: $rate= 1.5x10^{-6}[NH_{3}]^{^{0}}A$

    Q12.6.4

    Define these terms:

    1. unimolecular reaction
    2. bimolecular reaction
    3. elementary reaction
    4. overall reaction

    SOLUTION

    1. unimolecular reaction - a reaction where one molecule exists on the reactant side of the chemical reaction equation
    2. bimolecular reaction - a reaction where two molecules exist on the reactant side of the chemical reaction equation
    3. elementary reaction - a reaction where there is only one step and does not have any intermediates
    4. overall reaction - the complete reaction after all steps have been completed

    Q21.4.16

    The isotope 208Tl undergoes β decay with a half-life of 3.1 min.

    1. What isotope is produced by the decay?
    2. How long will it take for 99.0% of a sample of pure 208Tl to decay?
    3. What percentage of a sample of pure 208Tl remains un-decayed after 1.0 h?

    SOLUTION

    1. 208Tl → β + 208Pb because a β particle has an atomic number of -1 and a mass number of zero, so the 208Tl which has an atomic number of 81 changes to 82, which is Pb. The mass number does not change because beta particles do not add mass.

    2. We can use the equations t1/2=ln(2)/λ and N=Noe-λt to solve for how long it will take for 99.0% of a sample of pure 208Tl to decay.

    The half like of 208Tl is 3.1 min. Therefore, 3.1 min = ln(2) / λ.

    3.1 min ≈ 0.692 / λ

    λ = 0.22 min-1

    We can plug that into the other equation, N=Noe-λt, assuming we start with 1 mole of 208Tl and end with 0.01 mol 208Tl. We can rearrange the equation to more easily solve for t (time).

    N=Noe-λt

    N/No = e-λt

    ln[N/No] = ln(e-λt)

    ln[N/No] = -λt x ln(e)

    ln[N/No] = -λt

    (ln[N/No]) / -λ = t

    Thus,

    (ln[0.01/1]) / -0.22 min-1 = t

    t = 20.60 min

    It will take 20.60 minutes for 208Tl to decay 99.0%.

    3. From our previous equations, we know the decay constant of 208Tl is 0.22 min. To find the percentage of sample remaining after 1.0 hr, we can use N=Noe-λt and assume that we start with an initial concentration of 1 mole. We first have to convert either time or the decay constant to the same unit.

    t = 1.0 hr x (60 min / 1 hr) = 60 min. Then,

    N = 1 mol x e-(0.22/min)(60min)

    N = 1 mol x e-13.42

    N = 1.49x10-6 mol

    (1.49x10-6 mol / 1 mol initial) x 100 = 1.49x10-4 %

    After 1 hour, there is 1.49x10-4% of 208Tl remaining after decay.

    Q20.3.4

    What is the purpose of a salt bridge in a galvanic cell? Is it always necessary to use a salt bridge in a galvanic cell?

    SOLUTION

    The purpose of the salt bridge in the galvanic cell is to maintain charge balance when electrons are flowing from one substance to another. The electrons do not move along the salt bridge, rather they move along a wire and the salt bridge moves anions to the anode after having so many positively charged ions at that site. The salt bridge is necessary when one wants to keep the galvanic cell running, otherwise the flow of electrons and ions will stop.

    Q20.5.15

    Based on Table 19.2 and Table P2, do you agree with the proposed potentials for the following half-reactions? Why or why not?

    1. Cu2+(aq) + 2e → Cu(s), E° = 0.68 V
    2. Ce4+(aq) + 4e → Ce(s), E° = −0.62 V

    SOLUTION

    1. According to the 19.2 Table following the link above, the E° of the equation is 0.3419 V, not 0.68 V, so the proposed standard potential is incorrect.

    2. To find the standard reduction potential for this equation, we must look at the values when the overall reaction is split up:

    Ce4+(aq) + e- ⇌ Ce3+(aq), E° = 1.44 V and

    Ce3+ + 3e⇌ Ce(s), E° = -2.336 V

    From here, we can add the two standard reduction potentials because they both contribute to the same half-reaction.

    So, E° = 1.44 V + (-2.336 V) = -0.896 V

    Therefore, the given standard reduction potential is not correct.

    Q14.1.1

    What information can you obtain by studying the chemical kinetics of a reaction? Does a balanced chemical equation provide the same information? Why or why not?

    SOLUTION

    The information one can gain from studying the chemical kinetics of a reaction is its rate. The balanced equation does NOT provide any information about the mechanics of the reaction because there is no correlation between the rate order and the stoichiometry.

    Q14.4.8

    1-Bromopropane is a colorless liquid that reacts with S2O32− according to the following reaction:

    C3H7Br + S2O32-→C3H7S2O3- + Br-

    SOLUTION

    The reaction is first order in 1-bromopropane and first order in S2O32−, with a rate constant of 8.05 × 10−4 M−1·s−1. If you began a reaction with 40 mmol/100 mL of C3H7Br and an equivalent concentration of S2O32−, what would the initial reaction rate be? If you were to decrease the concentration of each reactant to 20 mmol/100 mL, what would the initial reaction rate be?

    rate = k [C3H7Br][S2O32-]

    rate = (8.05 × 10−4 M−1·s−1)[C3H7Br][S2O32-]

    rate = (8.05 × 10−4 M−1·s−1)[40 mmol/100 mL][40 mmol/100 mL], however, 40 mmol/100mL = 0.40 M, so

    rate = (8.05 × 10−4 M−1·s−1)[0.40M][0.40 M]

    rate = 1.288x10-4 M/s or 1.29x10-4 M/s

    and rate = (8.05 × 10−4 M−1·s−1)[20 mmol/100 mL][20 mmol/100 mL], where 20 mmol/100 mL = 0.20 M, so

    rate = (8.05 × 10−4 M−1·s−1)[0.20 M][0.20 M]

    rate = 3.22x10-5 M/s

    Therefore the answers given below are correct.

    S14.4.8

    1.29 × 10−4 M/s; 3.22 × 10−5 M/s


    Extra Credit 49 is shared under a CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by LibreTexts.

    • Was this article helpful?