# Fertilizers, Formulas, and Ecological Stoichiometry

- Page ID
- 152873

Fertilizers, Formulas and Ecological Stoichiometry

## Fertilizer Composition

When you shop for fertilizers, you will find them labeled according to the "NPK" (nitrogen/phosphorus/potassium) analysis. For example, one fertilizer might be labeled "18-51-20".

Deciphering this label requires understanding of chemical formulas.

The nitrogen value (18) is the actual percent nitrogen in the fertilizer, but the phosphorus and potassium values are not.

### Phosphorus Content

The phosphorus content is actually expressed as if the phosphorus compound were P_{2}O_{5}. So the "51" in the label means 51% P_{2}O_{5}.

But what percent of this is actually phosphorus itself?

We can determine that from the formula.

**EXAMPLE 1** Determine the percent phosphorus and the percent oxygen in P_{2}O_{5}.

**Solution** The formula indicates the relative amounts (in mol) of phosphorus and oxygen, so 1 mol of the compound contains 2 mol of P and 5 mol of O.

The percent phosphorus is

1 mol of P_{2}O

_{5}has a mass of (2 mol P * 31 g/mol P + 5 mol O * (16.0 g/mol O) = 142 g, and it contains 2 mol of P, weighing 2 mol P * 31.0 g/mol = 62.0 g, so... Similarly,

%O = 100% x (5 mol O * 16 g/mol) / (2 mol P * 31 g/mol P + 5 mol O * (16.0 g/mol O)

% O = 56.3%

If the fertilizer contains 51% P_{2}O_{5}, it contains only 43.7% of that as pure phosphorus, or 0.437 * 51 = 22.3% P.

**quantitative analysis**are used to determine the percentage by mass of each element in the compound. Such data are usually reported as the

**percent composition**.

**EXAMPLE 2** When 10.0 g of phosphorus burns in oxygen, 22.9 g of a pure compound is formed. Calculate the percent composition from these experimental data.

**Solution** The percentage of phosphorus is the mass of phosphorus divided by the total mass of compound times 100 percent:

### Potassium Content

The potassium (K) content of a fertilizer is actually expressed as if the potassium compound were K_{2}O. So the "20" in the label (above) means 20% K_{2}O, which is 17% oxygen and 83% elemental potassium:

% K = 100% x m _{(K, g)} / m _{(Total, g)} = (2 mol K * 39.1 g/mol) / (2 mol K * 39.1 g/mol + 1 mol O * 16.0 g/mol)

So the true percentage of potassium in the fertilizer is 0.83 x % K2O = 0.83 x 20% = 16.6% K

So 18−51−20 fertilizer actually contains (by weight) 18% elemental (N), 22% elemental (P), and 16% elemental (K).

## Ecological Stoichiometry and the Growth Rate Hypothesis

* Ecological stoichiometry* is an approach to ecology which studies how the chemical elements in a population of plants or animals matches the elements in the food supply for the population. Most plants and animals (including us) show a high degree of

*chemical hormesis*, that is, they have a characteristic chemical composition regardless of their environment, or food supply. They need food which supplies the elements in the proper ratios.

If we want plants to grow well, we need to supply elements in the proper ratios.

One claim of the practitioners of ecological stoichiometry is that fast growth requires high concentrations of RNA, which in turn requires a lot of phosphorus. This is the "Growth Rate Hypothesis" ^{[1]} ^{[2]}.

## Nutrient Ratios

The nitrogen to phosphorus ratio in RNA is similar to that in ATP, which is one of its constituents (along with UTP, CTP and GTP). Suppose that this N:P ratio establishes the requirements for the plant. We can then calculate the optimal N:P food ratio by calculating the N:P ratio in ATP, whose structure is:

From the formula, C_{10}H_{16}N_{5}O_{13}P_{3},we see that % N = 100* (5*14.0 / 507.2 ) = 13.8%

%P = 100* (3*31 / 507.2) = 18.3% P

So the optimal N/P ratio is 13.8/18.3 = 0.753:1

Is the 18−51−20 fertilizer optimal for ATP synthesis in the plant? The N:P ratio is 18/51 = 0.35, much less than that required. This particular fertilizer is designed for soils that are depleted in phosphorus.

*focuses on the chemical requirements of each trophic level, in addition to energy requirements. Proponents say that "Ecological stoichiometry recognizes that organisms themselves are outcomes of chemical reactions and thus their growth and reproduction can be constrained by supplies of key chemical elements [especially carbon (C), nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P)]".*

**Ecological stoichiometry**^{[3]}. Organisms in each trophic level of an ecosystem must have evolved to utilize the nutrient ratios provided by the lower trophic levels.

## Formulas from Percent Composition

To obtain the formula from percent-composition data for a phosphorus oxide, we must find how many phosphorus atoms there are per oxygen atom. On a macroscopic scale this corresponds to the ratio of the amount of phosphorus to the amount of oxygen. If the formula is P_{2}O_{5}, it not only indicates that there are five oxygen *atoms* for every two phosphorus *atoms*, it also says that there are 5 *mol* of oxygen atoms for each 2 *mol* of phosphorus atoms. That is, the *amount* of oxygen is 2.5 times the *amount* of phosphorus. The numbers in the ratio of the amount of phosphorus to the amount of oxygen (2:5) are the subscripts of phosphorus and oxygen in the formula.

**EXAMPLE 3** Phosphorus forms several oxides, including phosphorus pentoxide, P_{2}O_{5}, phosphorus trioxide, P_{2}O_{3}, P_{4}O_{7}, P_{4}O_{8}, P_{4}O_{9}, PO and P_{2}O_{6}. Determine the formula for the compound whose percent phosphorus is 49.2%.

**Solution** For convenience, assume that we have 100 g of the compound. Of this, 49.2 g (49.2%) is phosphorus and 50.8 g is oxygen (100% - 49.2%). Each mass can be converted to an amount of substance

_{2}.

This is the "Empirical Formula", and it gives the smallest ratio of atoms. The "molecular formula" could be twice as large, P_{2}O_{4}, or some other multiple of the empirical formula. In this case, the known oxide with the 1:2 ratio is PO_{4}O_{8}.

**EXAMPLE 5** Aspirin contains 60.0% C, 4.48% H, and 35.5% O. What is its empirical formula?

**Solution**

_{9}H

_{8}O

_{4}.

Once someone has determined a formula–empirical or molecular—it is possible for someone else to do the reverse calculation. Finding the weight-percent composition from the formula often proves quite informative, as the following example shows.

**EXAMPLE 6** In order to replenish nitrogen removed from the soil when plants are harvested, the compounds NaNO_{3} (sodium nitrate), NH_{4}NO_{3} (ammonium nitrate), and NH_{3} (ammonia) are used as fertilizers. If a farmer could buy each at the same cost per gram, which would be the best bargain? In other words, which compound contains the largest percentage of nitrogen?

**Solution** We will show the detailed calculation only for the case of NH_{4}NO_{3}.

_{4}NO

_{3}contains 2 mol N, 4 mol H, and 3 mol O. The molar mass is thus

*M*= (2 × 14.01 + 4 × 1.008 + 3 × 16.00) g mol

^{–1}= 80.05 g mol

^{–1}A 1-mol sample would weigh 80.05 g. The mass of 2 mol N it contains is Therefore the percentage of N is The percentages of H and O are easily calculated as Though not strictly needed to answer the problem, the latter two percentages provide a check of the results. The total 35.00 + 5.04% + 59.96% = 100.00% as it should. Similar calculations for NaNO

_{3}and NH

_{3}yield 16.48% and 82.24% nitrogen, respectively. The farmer who knows chemistry chooses ammonia!

## References
- ↑ Ecological Stoichiometry: The biolgy of elements from Molecules to Biosphere; Robert W. Sterner and James J. Elser; Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2002.
- ↑ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecological_stoichiometry
- ↑ http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.0050181

### Contributors
Ed Vitz (Kutztown University), John W. Moore (UW-Madison), Justin Shorb (Hope College), Xavier Prat-Resina (University of Minnesota Rochester), Tim Wendorff, and Adam Hahn.

### Contributors
Ed Vitz (Kutztown University), John W. Moore (UW-Madison), Justin Shorb (Hope College), Xavier Prat-Resina (University of Minnesota Rochester), Tim Wendorff, and Adam Hahn.

Ed Vitz (Kutztown University), John W. Moore (UW-Madison), Justin Shorb (Hope College), Xavier Prat-Resina (University of Minnesota Rochester), Tim Wendorff, and Adam Hahn.