# 1.0.2: Conversions

- Page ID
- 210568

Learning Objectives

- Solve dimensional analysis using metric and English units. (note: metric unit definitions will not be provided on quiz.)

It is often the case that a quantity of interest may not be easy (or even possible) to measure directly but instead must be calculated from other directly measured properties and appropriate mathematical relationships. For example, consider measuring the average speed of an athlete running sprints. This is typically accomplished by measuring the *time* required for the athlete to run from the starting line to the finish line, and the *distance* between these two lines, and then computing *speed* from the equation that relates these three properties:

\[\mathrm{speed=\dfrac{distance}{time}}\]

An Olympic-quality sprinter can run 100 m in approximately 10 s, corresponding to an average speed of

\[\mathrm{\dfrac{100\: m}{10\: s}=10\: m/s}\]

Note that this simple arithmetic involves dividing the numbers of each measured quantity to yield the number of the computed quantity (100/10 = 10) *and likewise* dividing the units of each measured quantity to yield the unit of the computed quantity (m/s = m/s). Now, consider using this same relation to predict the time required for a person running at this speed to travel a distance of 25 m. The same relation between the three properties is used, but in this case, the two quantities provided are a speed (10 m/s) and a distance (25 m). To yield the sought property, time, the equation must be rearranged appropriately:

\[\mathrm{time=\dfrac{distance}{speed}}\]

The time can then be computed as:

\[\mathrm{\dfrac{25\: m}{10\: m/s}=2.5\: s}\]

Again, arithmetic on the numbers (25/10 = 2.5) was accompanied by the same arithmetic on the units (m/m/s = s) to yield the number and unit of the result, 2.5 s. Note that, just as for numbers, when a unit is divided by an identical unit (in this case, m/m), the result is “1”—or, as commonly phrased, the units “cancel.”

These calculations are examples of a versatile mathematical approach known as dimensional analysis (or the factor-label method). Dimensional analysis is based on this premise: *the units of quantities must be subjected to the same mathematical operations as their associated numbers*. This method can be applied to computations ranging from simple unit conversions to more complex, multi-step calculations involving several different quantities.

## Conversion Factors and Dimensional Analysis

A ratio of two equivalent quantities expressed with different measurement units can be used as a unit conversion factor. For example, the lengths of 2.54 cm and 1 in. are equivalent (by definition), and so a unit conversion factor may be derived from the ratio,

\[\mathrm{\dfrac{2.54\: cm}{1\: in.}\:(2.54\: cm=1\: in.)\: or\: 2.54\:\dfrac{cm}{in.}}\]

Several other commonly used conversion factors are given in Table \(\PageIndex{1}\).

Length |
Volume |
Mass |
---|---|---|

1 m = 1.0936 yd | 1 L = 1.0567 qt | 1 kg = 2.2046 lb |

1 in. = 2.54 cm (exact) | 1 qt = 0.94635 L | 1 lb = 453.59 g |

1 km = 0.62137 mi | 1 ft^{3} = 28.317 L |
1 (avoirdupois) oz = 28.349 g |

1 mi = 1609.3 m | 1 tbsp = 14.787 mL | 1 (troy) oz = 31.103 g |

When we multiply a quantity (such as distance given in inches) by an appropriate unit conversion factor, we convert the quantity to an equivalent value with different units (such as distance in centimeters). For example, a basketball player’s vertical jump of 34 inches can be converted to centimeters by:

\[\mathrm{34\: \cancel{in.} \times \dfrac{2.54\: cm}{1\:\cancel{in.}}=86\: cm}\]

Since this simple arithmetic involves *quantities*, the premise of dimensional analysis requires that we multiply both *numbers and units*. The numbers of these two quantities are multiplied to yield the number of the product quantity, 86, whereas the units are multiplied to yield

\[\mathrm{\dfrac{in.\times cm}{in.}}.\]

Just as for numbers, a ratio of identical units is also numerically equal to one,

\[\mathrm{\dfrac{in.}{in.}=1}\]

and the unit product thus simplifies to *cm*. (When identical units divide to yield a factor of 1, they are said to “cancel.”) Using dimensional analysis, we can determine that a unit conversion factor has been set up correctly by checking to confirm that the original unit will cancel, and the result will contain the sought (converted) unit.

Example \(\PageIndex{1}\): Using a Unit Conversion Factor

The mass of a competition Frisbee is 125 g. Convert its mass to ounces using the unit conversion factor derived from the relationship 1 oz = 28.349 g (Table \(\PageIndex{1}\)).

**Solution **

If we have the conversion factor, we can determine the mass in kilograms using an equation similar the one used for converting length from inches to centimeters.

\[x\:\mathrm{oz=125\: g\times unit\: conversion\: factor}\nonumber\]

We write the unit conversion factor in its two forms:

\[\mathrm{\dfrac{1\: oz}{28.349\: g}\:and\:\dfrac{28.349\: g}{1\: oz}}\nonumber\]

The correct unit conversion factor is the ratio that cancels the units of grams and leaves ounces.

\[\begin{align*}

x\:\ce{oz}&=\mathrm{125\:\cancel{g}\times \dfrac{1\: oz}{28.349\:\cancel{g}}}\\

&=\mathrm{\left(\dfrac{125}{28.349}\right)\:oz}\\

&=\mathrm{4.41\: oz\: (three\: significant\: figures)}

\end{align*}\]

Exercise \(\PageIndex{1}\)

Convert a volume of 9.345 qt to liters.

**Answer**-
8.844 L

Beyond simple unit conversions, the factor-label method can be used to solve more complex problems involving computations. Regardless of the details, the basic approach is the same—all the *factors* involved in the calculation must be appropriately oriented to insure that their *labels* (units) will appropriately cancel and/or combine to yield the desired unit in the result. This is why it is referred to as the factor-label method. As your study of chemistry continues, you will encounter many opportunities to apply this approach.

Example \(\PageIndex{2}\): Computing Quantities from Measurement Results

What is the density of common antifreeze in units of g/mL? A 4.00-qt sample of the antifreeze weighs 9.26 lb.

**Solution **

Since \(\mathrm{density=\dfrac{mass}{volume}}\), we need to divide the mass in grams by the volume in milliliters. In general: the number of units of B = the number of units of A \(\times\) unit conversion factor. The necessary conversion factors are given in Table 1.7.1: 1 lb = 453.59 g; 1 L = 1.0567 qt; 1 L = 1,000 mL. We can convert mass from pounds to grams in one step:

\[\mathrm{9.26\:\cancel{lb}\times \dfrac{453.59\: g}{1\:\cancel{lb}}=4.20\times 10^3\:g}\nonumber \]

We need to use two steps to convert volume from quarts to milliliters.

*Convert quarts to liters.*

\[\mathrm{4.00\:\cancel{qt}\times\dfrac{1\: L}{1.0567\:\cancel{qt}}=3.78\: L}\nonumber\]

*Convert liters to milliliters.*

\[\mathrm{3.78\:\cancel{L}\times\dfrac{1000\: mL}{1\:\cancel{L}}=3.78\times10^3\:mL}\nonumber\]

Then,

\[\mathrm{density=\dfrac{4.20\times10^3\:g}{3.78\times10^3\:mL}=1.11\: g/mL}\nonumber\]

Alternatively, the calculation could be set up in a way that uses three unit conversion factors sequentially as follows:

\[\mathrm{\dfrac{9.26\:\cancel{lb}}{4.00\:\cancel{qt}}\times\dfrac{453.59\: g}{1\:\cancel{lb}}\times\dfrac{1.0567\:\cancel{qt}}{1\:\cancel{L}}\times\dfrac{1\:\cancel{L}}{1000\: mL}=1.11\: g/mL}\nonumber\]

Exercise \(\PageIndex{2}\)

What is the volume in liters of 1.000 oz, given that 1 L = 1.0567 qt and 1 qt = 32 oz (exactly)?

**Answer**-
\(\mathrm{2.956\times10^{-2}\:L}\)

Example \(\PageIndex{3}\): Computing Quantities from Measurement Results

While being driven from Philadelphia to Atlanta, a distance of about 1250 km, a 2014 Lamborghini Aventador Roadster uses 213 L gasoline.

- What (average) fuel economy, in miles per gallon, did the Roadster get during this trip?
- If gasoline costs $3.80 per gallon, what was the fuel cost for this trip?

**Solution**

(a) We first convert distance from kilometers to miles:

\[\mathrm{1250\: km\times\dfrac{0.62137\: mi}{1\: km}=777\: mi}\nonumber\]

and then convert volume from liters to gallons:

\[\mathrm{213\:\cancel{L}\times\dfrac{1.0567\:\cancel{qt}}{1\:\cancel{L}}\times\dfrac{1\: gal}{4\:\cancel{qt}}=56.3\: gal}\nonumber\]

Then,

\[\mathrm{(average)\: mileage=\dfrac{777\: mi}{56.3\: gal}=13.8\: miles/gallon=13.8\: mpg}\nonumber\]

Alternatively, the calculation could be set up in a way that uses all the conversion factors sequentially, as follows:

\[\mathrm{\dfrac{1250\:\cancel{km}}{213\:\cancel{L}}\times\dfrac{0.62137\: mi}{1\:\cancel{km}}\times\dfrac{1\:\cancel{L}}{1.0567\:\cancel{qt}}\times\dfrac{4\:\cancel{qt}}{1\: gal}=13.8\: mpg}\nonumber \]

(b) Using the previously calculated volume in gallons, we find:

\[\mathrm{56.3\: gal\times\dfrac{$3.80}{1\: gal}=$214}\nonumber \]

Exercise \(\PageIndex{3}\)

A Toyota Prius Hybrid uses 59.7 L gasoline to drive from San Francisco to Seattle, a distance of 1300 km (two significant digits).

- What (average) fuel economy, in miles per gallon, did the Prius get during this trip?
- If gasoline costs $3.90 per gallon, what was the fuel cost for this trip?

**Answer a**-
51 mpg

**Answer b**-
$62

## Units Raised to a Power

When calculating area or volume, you multiply together lengths, widths, and heights. Just like in our dimensional analysis above, our units and our numbers both undergo the mathematical operation, meaning that multiplying the quantity of length by the quantity of width also multiplies the units.

$$42cm*33cm=1386 cm^{^{2}}\]

This complicates the conversion of units, however, since our GIVEN conversion factors often only account for one dimension, not two or three. When building a conversion factor for units raised to a power, we simply raise the conversion factor to the power we want our final units in. The trick is to remember to raise the QUANTITY and UNITS by the power.

Example \(\PageIndex{4}\): Computing Quantities from Measurement Results

Convert 5.70 L to in^{3}.

**Solution**

We must first convert L to mL, which as we saw in Section 1.1, is equivalent to cm^{3}.

$$5.70 L*\frac{1000 mL}{1 L}*\frac{1 cm^{3}}{1 mL}=5700cm^{3}\]

Now, if we examine the table of conversion factors (*Table \(\PageIndex{1}\)), *we find that there is 16.4 cm^{3} in 1 in^{3}.

$$5700cm^{3}*\frac{1in^{^{3}}}{16.4cm^{3}}=347.6cm^{3}\]

We could have just as easily have done this if we hadn't been given the direct conversion factor between cm^{3 }and in^{3}. We simply would have had to raise the conversion factor between cm and in to the third power.

$$5700cm^{3}*\left ( \frac{1in}{2.54cm} \right )^{3}=347.6in^{3}\]

The trick with this way of doing the calculation is you have to remember to apply the power to EVERYTHING:

$$\left ( \frac{1in}{2.54cm} \right )^{3}=\frac{\left ( 1^{3}in^{3} \right )}{2.54^{3}cm^{3}}\]