1.8.12: Enthalpies- Born-Bjerrum Equation- Salt Solutions
- Page ID
- 375300
\( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)
\( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)
\( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)
( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)
\( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)
\( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)
\( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)
\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)
\( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\)
\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)
\( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)
\( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)
\( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\)
\( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)
\( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\)
\( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)
\( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)
\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)
\( \newcommand{\vectorA}[1]{\vec{#1}} % arrow\)
\( \newcommand{\vectorAt}[1]{\vec{\text{#1}}} % arrow\)
\( \newcommand{\vectorB}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)
\( \newcommand{\vectorC}[1]{\textbf{#1}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vectorD}[1]{\overrightarrow{#1}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vectorDt}[1]{\overrightarrow{\text{#1}}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vectE}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{\mathbf {#1}}}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)
\( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)
It is generally assumed that the Born Equation yields a difference in Gibbs energies rather than Helmholtz energies and so one can use the Gibbs-Helmholtz Equation for the dependence on temperature at fixed pressure to yield the Born-Bjerrum Equation, assuming that (\(\mathrm{dr}_{\mathrm{j}} / \mathrm{dT}\)) is zero.
\[\begin{aligned}
&\Delta(\mathrm{pfg} \rightarrow \mathrm{s} \ln ) \mathrm{H}_{\mathrm{j}}\left(\mathrm{c}_{\mathrm{j}}=1 \mathrm{moldm} \mathrm{dm}^{-3} ; \mathrm{id} ; \mathrm{T} ; \mathrm{p}\right)= \\
&\quad-\left[\mathrm{N}_{\mathrm{A}} \,\left(\mathrm{z}_{\mathrm{j}} \, \mathrm{e}\right)^{2} / 8 \, \pi \, \mathrm{r}_{\mathrm{j}} \, \varepsilon_{0}\right] \,\left[1-\left(1 / \varepsilon_{\mathrm{r}}\right)-\left(\mathrm{T} / \varepsilon_{\mathrm{r}}\right) \,\left(\partial \ln \varepsilon_{\mathrm{r}} / \partial \mathrm{T}\right)_{\mathrm{p}}\right]
\end{aligned}\]
In fact an early calorimetric study showed that in terms of predicting the enthalpies of solution for salts, the Born equation is inadequate, often predicting the wrong sign. [1,2]
Differentiation of equation (a) with respect to temperature yields an equation for the partial molar isobaric heat capacity of ion \(j\) in a solution having ideal thermodynamic properties.
\[\begin{aligned}
&C_{p j}\left(\operatorname{sln} ; c_{j}=1 \mathrm{~mol} \mathrm{dm}{ }^{-3} ; \mathrm{id} ; \mathrm{T} ; \mathrm{p}\right) \\
&=-\left[\mathrm{N}_{\mathrm{A}} \,\left(\mathrm{z}_{\mathrm{j}} \, \mathrm{e}\right)^{2} / 8 \, \pi \, \mathrm{r}_{\mathrm{j}} \, \varepsilon_{0}\right] \,\left[\partial\left\{\left(1 / \varepsilon_{\mathrm{r}}\right)+\left(\mathrm{T} / \varepsilon_{\mathrm{r}}\right) \, \partial \ln \varepsilon_{\mathrm{r}} / \partial \mathrm{T}\right\} / \partial \mathrm{T}\right]
\end{aligned}\]
Footnotes
[1] F. A. Askew, E. Bullock, H. T. Smith, R. K. Tinkler, O. Gatty and J. H. Wolfenden, J. Chem. Soc., 1934, 1368.
[2] For estimation of single in enthalpies see M. Booij and G. Somsen, Electrochim Acta,1983,28,1883.