9.21: The Entropy Change for A Spontaneous Process at Constant E and V
- Page ID
- 152096
\( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)
\( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)
\( \newcommand{\dsum}{\displaystyle\sum\limits} \)
\( \newcommand{\dint}{\displaystyle\int\limits} \)
\( \newcommand{\dlim}{\displaystyle\lim\limits} \)
\( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)
( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)
\( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)
\( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)
\( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)
\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)
\( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\)
\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)
\( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)
\( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)
\( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\)
\( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)
\( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\)
\( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)
\( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)
\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)
\( \newcommand{\vectorA}[1]{\vec{#1}} % arrow\)
\( \newcommand{\vectorAt}[1]{\vec{\text{#1}}} % arrow\)
\( \newcommand{\vectorB}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)
\( \newcommand{\vectorC}[1]{\textbf{#1}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vectorD}[1]{\overrightarrow{#1}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vectorDt}[1]{\overrightarrow{\text{#1}}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vectE}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{\mathbf {#1}}}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)
\(\newcommand{\longvect}{\overrightarrow}\)
\( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)
\(\newcommand{\ket}[1]{\left| #1 \right>}\)
\(\newcommand{\bra}[1]{\left< #1 \right|}\)
\(\newcommand{\braket}[2]{\left< #1 \vphantom{#2} \right| \left. #2 \vphantom{#1} \right>}\)
\(\newcommand{\braopket}[3]{\left< #1 \vphantom{#2}\vphantom{#3} \right| #2 \vphantom{#1}\vphantom{#3} \left| #3 \vphantom{#1}\vphantom{#2} \right>}\)
\(\newcommand{\qmvec}[1]{\mathbf{\vec{#1}}}\)
\(\newcommand{\op}[1]{\hat{\mathbf{#1}}}\)
\(\newcommand{\expect}[1]{\langle #1 \rangle}\)
\(\newcommand{\dfn}[1]{\emph{\textbf{#1}}}\)
For any spontaneous process, we have \(dE={dq}^{spon}\)+\({dw}^{spon}\), which we can rearrange to \({dq}^{spon}=dE-{dw}^{spon}\). Substituting our result from Section 9.15, we have
\[\hat{T}dS>dE-dw^{spon} \nonumber \] (spontaneous process)
If the energy of the system is constant throughout the process, we have \(dE=0\) and
\[\hat{T}{\left(dS\right)}_E>-dw^{spon} \nonumber \] (spontaneous process, constant energy)
The spontaneous work is the sum of the pressure–volume work and the non-pressure–volume work, \(\ dw^{spon}={dw}^{spon}_{PV}+{dw}^{spon}_{NPV}\). If we introduce the further condition that the spontaneous process occurs while the volume of the system remains constant, we have \({dw}^{spon}_{PV}=0\). Making this substitution and repeating our earlier result for a reversible process, we have the parallel relationships
\[{\left(dS\right)}_{EV}>\frac{-dw^{spon}_{NPV}}{\hat{T}} \nonumber \] (spontaneous process, constant \(E\) and \(V\))
\[{\left(dS\right)}_{EV}=\frac{-dw^{spon}_{NPV}}{\hat{T}} \nonumber \] (reversible process, constant \(E\) and \(V\))
(For a reversible process, \(T=\hat{T}\).) If the spontaneous process occurs while \(\hat{T}\) is constant, summing the incremental contributions to a finite change of state produces the parallel relationships
\[{\left(\Delta S\right)}_{EV}>\frac{-w^{spon}_{NPV}}{\hat{T}} \nonumber \] (spontaneous process, constant \(E\), \(V\), and \(\hat{T}\))
\[{\left(\Delta S\right)}_{EV}=\frac{-w^{spon}_{NPV}}{\hat{T}} \nonumber \] (reversible process, constant \(E\), \(V\), and \(\hat{T}\))
Constant \(\hat{T}\) corresponds to the common situation in chemical experimentation in which we place a reaction vessel in a constant-temperature bath. If we introduce the further condition that only pressure–volume work is possible, we have \(dw^{spon}_{NPV}=0\). The parallel relationships become
\[{\left(dS\right)}_{EV}>0 \nonumber \] (spontaneous process, constant \(E\) and \(V\), only \(PV\) work)
\[{\left(dS\right)}_{EV}=0 \nonumber \] (reversible process, constant \(E\) and \(V\), only\(\ PV\) work)
If the energy and volume are constant for a system in which only pressure–volume work is possible, the system is isolated. The conditions we have just derived are entirely equivalent to our earlier conclusions that \(dS=0\) and \(dS>0\) for an isolated system that is at equilibrium or undergoing a spontaneous change, respectively. Summing the incremental contributions to a finite change of state produces the parallel relationships
\[{\left(\Delta S\right)}_{EV}>0 \nonumber \] (spontaneous process, only \(PV\) work)
\[{\left(\Delta S\right)}_{EV}=0 \nonumber \] (reversible process, only \(PV\) work)
The validity of these expressions is independent of any variation in either \(T\) or \(\hat{T}\).


