Skip to main content
Chemistry LibreTexts

8: Strategies in Cedrene Synthesis

  • Page ID
  • \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    ( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)

    \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)

    \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorA}[1]{\vec{#1}}      % arrow\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorAt}[1]{\vec{\text{#1}}}      % arrow\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorB}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorC}[1]{\textbf{#1}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorD}[1]{\overrightarrow{#1}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorDt}[1]{\overrightarrow{\text{#1}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectE}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{\mathbf {#1}}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)

    \(\newcommand{\avec}{\mathbf a}\) \(\newcommand{\bvec}{\mathbf b}\) \(\newcommand{\cvec}{\mathbf c}\) \(\newcommand{\dvec}{\mathbf d}\) \(\newcommand{\dtil}{\widetilde{\mathbf d}}\) \(\newcommand{\evec}{\mathbf e}\) \(\newcommand{\fvec}{\mathbf f}\) \(\newcommand{\nvec}{\mathbf n}\) \(\newcommand{\pvec}{\mathbf p}\) \(\newcommand{\qvec}{\mathbf q}\) \(\newcommand{\svec}{\mathbf s}\) \(\newcommand{\tvec}{\mathbf t}\) \(\newcommand{\uvec}{\mathbf u}\) \(\newcommand{\vvec}{\mathbf v}\) \(\newcommand{\wvec}{\mathbf w}\) \(\newcommand{\xvec}{\mathbf x}\) \(\newcommand{\yvec}{\mathbf y}\) \(\newcommand{\zvec}{\mathbf z}\) \(\newcommand{\rvec}{\mathbf r}\) \(\newcommand{\mvec}{\mathbf m}\) \(\newcommand{\zerovec}{\mathbf 0}\) \(\newcommand{\onevec}{\mathbf 1}\) \(\newcommand{\real}{\mathbb R}\) \(\newcommand{\twovec}[2]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\ctwovec}[2]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\threevec}[3]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cthreevec}[3]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\fourvec}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cfourvec}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\fivevec}[5]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \\ #5 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cfivevec}[5]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \\ #5 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\mattwo}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{rr}#1 \amp #2 \\ #3 \amp #4 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\laspan}[1]{\text{Span}\{#1\}}\) \(\newcommand{\bcal}{\cal B}\) \(\newcommand{\ccal}{\cal C}\) \(\newcommand{\scal}{\cal S}\) \(\newcommand{\wcal}{\cal W}\) \(\newcommand{\ecal}{\cal E}\) \(\newcommand{\coords}[2]{\left\{#1\right\}_{#2}}\) \(\newcommand{\gray}[1]{\color{gray}{#1}}\) \(\newcommand{\lgray}[1]{\color{lightgray}{#1}}\) \(\newcommand{\rank}{\operatorname{rank}}\) \(\newcommand{\row}{\text{Row}}\) \(\newcommand{\col}{\text{Col}}\) \(\renewcommand{\row}{\text{Row}}\) \(\newcommand{\nul}{\text{Nul}}\) \(\newcommand{\var}{\text{Var}}\) \(\newcommand{\corr}{\text{corr}}\) \(\newcommand{\len}[1]{\left|#1\right|}\) \(\newcommand{\bbar}{\overline{\bvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\bhat}{\widehat{\bvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\bperp}{\bvec^\perp}\) \(\newcommand{\xhat}{\widehat{\xvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\vhat}{\widehat{\vvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\uhat}{\widehat{\uvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\what}{\widehat{\wvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\Sighat}{\widehat{\Sigma}}\) \(\newcommand{\lt}{<}\) \(\newcommand{\gt}{>}\) \(\newcommand{\amp}{&}\) \(\definecolor{fillinmathshade}{gray}{0.9}\)

    Cedrene represents a very complex tricyclic sesquiterpene. Such complexity called for ingenious approaches for the total synthesis of the ring system. There are several syntheses reported for this ring system. We would discuss a few approaches. Some strategic bond cleavages are shown as broken lines in Figure 8.1.

    By cleaving at different sites of the starting material, Corey, Stork, Anderson, and Hee-Yoon Lee synthesize Cedrene.
    Figure 8.1

    Disconnection at ‘a’: G. Stork, (J. Am. Chem. Soc., 77, 1078 (1955); ibid, 83, 3114 (1961)) took advantage of the fact that fused five membered rings would be cis- fused. Such a system would have a crowded ‘concave phase’. These two features formed the basis for Stork’s synthesis of Cedrene. Their synthetic scheme is shown in Figure 8.2. The first alkylation set in motion the steric out come of the remaining steps.

    Figure 8.2

    Disconnection at ‘b’: For his 1969 Cedrene synthesis (J. Am. Chem. Soc., 91, 1557 (1969)), Corey set up the spiro-ring system (cleavage of bond ‘b’). A p- alkylation of phenolate gave the spiro ring (J. Am. Chem. Soc., 84, 788 (1962)). Lewis catalyzed cylisation of the enolate completed the skeleton (Figure 8.3).

    Figure 8.3

    Disconnection at ‘b’ and ‘d’: Based on biogenetic cyclization concept, Corey achieved a one-step cyclization of the A and B rings (Figure 8.4) onto a preformed C ring (Tet. Lett., 2455 (1972)). The key for success in this scheme is the prior formation of bond ‘d’ followed by the formation of the ‘b’ bond. Note the role of a cyclopropyl ketone that orchestrated the development of a carbonium ion followed by an incipient carbanion to complete the A and B rings in this order.

    Figure 8.4

    Biogenetic type cyclization: A remarkable biogenetic type cyclization of Nerolidol to Cedrene was reported by Anderson,(Tet. Lett., 2455 (1972). The cyclizations could be accomplished in two steps. With formic acid a six membered ring is first formed. Further treatments with triflouroacetic acid completed the synthesis. The overall yield was very moderate (Figure 8.5).

    Figure 8.5

    Disconnection at ‘e’ and ‘d’ bonds: In Anderson’s biogenetic-type cyclization, formation of the six membered C ring was first realized. A six membered ring system also served as a key step for free radical cyclization reported by Hee-Yoon Lee. Tandem radical cyclization was their central theme. Such radical cyclizations have been reported for the synthesis of natural products. Hee-Yoon Lee reported application of this strategy to the synthesis of α-Cedrene (Ter. Lett., 7713 (1998)). The success of this scheme hinged on two factors.

    1. Selective formation of a radical for formation of ‘d’ bond to accomplish the B ring
    2. The acceptor carbon should generate a new free radical in the process to complete the A ring. The first task was achieved through incorporation of a xanthane unit and the second crucial task was accomplished via., N-aziridinylimine group. The synthetic scheme is shown in Figure 8.6.
    Figure 8.6

    Disconnection at ‘b’ and ‘d’: An approach by Chen, (Tet. Lett., 2961 (1993)) relied on the free radical cyclization reaction on a suitably fuctionalized C ring (Figure 8.7). The synthesis of C ring is achieved via., a DA reaction. Knoevenagal reaction placed the required chain for completing the A and B rings. Tin hydride reduction generated a free radical at the site of the nitro group, which underwent a tandem cyclization to complete the A and B rings in that order.

    Figure 8.7

    A Diels-Alder approach to to tricyclic cedrene skeleton was reported by Breitholle, (Can. J. Chem., 54, 1991 (1976) (Figure 8.8). Alkylation of cyclobutadiene to the requisite chain gave 8.8A after equilibration. The DA reaction proceeded in 36% yield to give a mixture of isomers. The ketone 8.8B did not undergo ring expantion with diazomethane. The ring expansion was finally achieved via the methylene amine 8.8C via diazotisation. The fact that two ring expansion products 8.8D and 8.8E were formed with 8.8D as the major product suggests that the amine 8.8F was the major isomer.

    Figure 8.8

    This page titled 8: Strategies in Cedrene Synthesis is shared under a CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by R Balaji Rao via source content that was edited to the style and standards of the LibreTexts platform.