Skip to main content
Chemistry LibreTexts

Accuracy of Spectrophotometer Readings

  • Page ID
    77479
  • The needle deflection or the number shown on the digital display of a spectrophotometer is proportional to the transmittance of the solution. How do errors in transmittance readings affect the accuracy of solution concentration values? The concentration as a function of the transmittance is given by the equation

    \[c(T) = - \dfrac{\log T}{ \epsilon \,b}\]

    Let \(c_o\) be the true concentration and \(T_o\) the corresponding transmittance, i.e. \(c_o = c(To)\). Suppose that the actual transmittance measured is \(T_o + T\), corresponding to the concentration

    \[c_o + c = c(To + T).\]

    The error in the transmittance is \(T\) and that of the concentration is \(c\).

    By using a Taylor series expansion, and discarding all terms higher than T to the first power, it is possible to show that:

    \[\Delta c = - \dfrac{\Delta T}{ 2.303 \epsilon \,b\,T}\]

    Dividing the second equation by the first gives us:

    \[ \dfrac{\Delta c}{c} = \dfrac{\Delta T}{ 2.303 \epsilon \,b\,T} = \dfrac{\Delta T}{ T \,ln T}\]

    Values of -(TlnT)-1 as a function of T or A (A = -logT) are tabulated below. Below the tabulation one finds a plot of -(TlnT)-1 versus T.

    The relative error in the concentration, for a given T, has its smallest value, when T = 1/e = 0.368 or when A = 0.434. The minimum is not sharp and good results can be expected in a transmittance range from 0.2 to 0.6 or an absorbance range from 0.7 to 0.2. An inspection of the graph below indicates that transmittance values of 0.1 and 0.8 are the outside limits between which one can expect to obtain reasonably accurate results. These transmittance values correspond to an absorbance range of 0.1 to 1.0 absorbance units. This is the rationale for limiting your calibration curve to that absorbance range.

    Table 1: Values of -(T In T)-1 as a Function of T and A
    T -(T ln T)-1 A
    0.010 21.71 2.00
    0.050 6.68 1.30
    0.100 4.34 1.00
    0.150 3.51 0.824
    0.200 3.11 0.699
    0.250 2.89 0.602
    0.300 2.77 0.523
    0.350 2.72 0.456
    0.368 2.718 0.434
    0.400 2.73 0.398
    0.450 2.78 0.347
    0.500 2.89 0.301
    0.550 3.04 0.260
    0.600 3.26 0.222
    0.650 3.57 0.187
    0.700 4.01 0.155
    0.750 4.63 0.125
    0.800 5.60 0.097
    0.850 7.24 0.071
    0.900 10.55 0.046
    0.950 20.52 0.022
    0.990 100.50 0.004

    Graph of -(T ln T)-1 vs. T

    tlnt-1.gif

    Contributors

    • Ulrich de la Camp and Oliver Seely (California State University, Dominguez Hills).