Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/HTML-CSS/jax.js
Skip to main content
Library homepage
 

Text Color

Text Size

 

Margin Size

 

Font Type

Enable Dyslexic Font
Chemistry LibreTexts

Particle in a Finite Potential Box (Python Notebook)

( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)

Defining the Problem

Consider the case in which the walls do not have infinite Potential height. Instead, they reach a maximum, finite value, Vo eV.

 
download.png
Figure 1: Regions in the particle in a box with finite potential model

The Schrödinger Equation and Solutions

Behavior inside the Box

d2ψ(x)dx2=2mE2ψ(x)=k2ψ(x)

Solutions have the general form of

ψ(x)=e±ikx

Therefore:

ψ(x)=q1cos(kx)+q2sin(kx)

Behavior outside the Box

d2ψ(x)dx2=2m(EVo)2ψ(x)

Connecting the two Behaviors

For E<Vo, it is really interesting to look at what happens outside the walls.

When E<Vo, the Schrödinger equation becomes

2ψ(x)x2=α2oψ(x)

since

α2o=2m(VoE)2>0.

The solutions to this equation have the general form of

ψ(x)=e±αox.

Note that the exponential function does not require an imaginary component, thus it is not oscillatory. Before we move on, here are some questions to consider:

Exercise 1

  • Q1: Can you test if this is a solution to the differential equation?
  • Q2 Can you write the general solution for a particle outside the box.
  • Q3: What is the value of αo?
  • Q4: Given that ψ(x) must be finite, how would this constrain the solutions for x?
  • Q5: Given that ψ(x) must be finite, how would this constrain the solutions for x?

From the general solutions, and applying those constrains, we can consider three distinct regions (Figure 1). In each region the wavefunction for E<Vo will be:

I:V(x)=VoxL2ψI=AeαoxII:V(x)=0L2xL2ψII=Bcos(kx)+Csin(kx)III:V(x)=VoxL2ψIII=Deαox

where αo=2m(VoE) and k=2mE.

The wavefunction must obey the following boundary conditions:

ψI(L2)=ψII(L2)ψII(L2)=ψIII(L2)ψI(L2)=ψII(L2)ψII(L2)=ψIII(L2)

where the symbol corresponds to the first derivative with respect to x (ψ=dψdx).

Note

ψ needs to be continuous to guarantee the existence of ψ, whose existence is required from the first postulate. d2dx2 is a component of the kinetic energy operator. If the wavefunction does not have a well-defined second derivative, then the kinetic energy would be undefined, which is not possible.

It can be shown that when the potential is even (V(x)=V(x)), the wavefunctions can be either even (ψ(x)=ψ(x)]) or odd ([ψ(x)=ψ(x)).
On the way the potential is written, we are considering that the particle is in a finite box with an even potential. Thus, even and odd solutions of the wavefunction can be found independently:

Even solutions

For xL2:ψI(x)=DeαoxFor L2xL2:ψII(x)=Bcos(kx)For xL2:ψIII(x)=Deαox After imposing the boundary conditions we reach the following relation: αo=ktan(kL2)VoE=Etan(L2mE2)

Odd solutions

For xL2:ψI(x)=DeαoxFor L2xL2:ψII(x)=Csin(kx)For xL2:ψIII(x)=Deαox After imposing the boundary conditions we reach the following relation: αo=ktan(kL2)VoE=Etan(L2mE2)

The actual solutions will be those corresponding to energies that obey Equations ??? and ???. Once we find the allowed energies, we can go back and obtain the wavefunctions with the proper coefficients.

Finding the allowed Energies Graphically

Unfortunately, we cannot find the allowed energies analytically. Instead we can do it graphically (first) or numerically (later). That is: we can graph the left and right hand side Equations ??? and ??? and look for the intersection points. Those will correspond to the allowed energy values.

Finding Allowed Energies

The allowed values would then be the values of E in which the two curves cross. Here are some question to think about:

Exercise 1

  • Q1: How many bound states are possible?
  • Q2: How many bound states are even and how many are odd?
  • Q3: Is the ground state described by an even or an odd wavefunction?
  • Q4: Can you read accuretely the allowed values of energy from these graphs?

The allowed values of E can be found by numerically, yielding:

Allowed Energies

We can now plot these energy values as a diagram. Plotting an Energy Diagram helps us to see the energy separation between the states.

Energy Diagram

Enter the value for Vo (in eV) = 
Enter the value for L (in Angstroms) = 

We can plug the values of E back into the wavefunction expressions and plot the wavefunctions together with their corresponding probability densities.

Wavefunctions and Probability Densities

The bound wavefunctions are:

Bound Wavefunctions

The bound Probability Densities are shown below with the areas shaded in green showing the regions where the particle can tunnel outside the box

Tunneling

If we compare these results with those of a particle in a box of same size but with infinite potential, we conclude that in the finite box, the levels are shifted to lower energies. More strikingly is the observation that the wavefunctions and the probability densities have non-zero values outside the box limits.

Classically, the particle cannot be found outside the box because the available energy is lower than the potential wall (E<Vo). However, for the particle in the finite box the wavefunction is nonzero outside the box, which means that there is a possibility of finding the particle outside the box. This is a pure quantum effect called the tunneling effect.

The tunneling probability correspond to the area outside the box that has non-zero values of probability density. In the graphically representation, those areas are shaded in green. The integration of those areas provide the probability that the particle will tunnel outside the classically allowed region.

L2|ψ(x)|2 dx++L2|ψ(x)|2 dx+|ψ(x)|2 dx

where the denominator is 1 for a normalized wavefunction.

This integral can be solved analytically (for the even and for the odd solutions). The tunneling probability for each state is:

Tunneling Probabilities

These evaluation and graphical representations show that the tunneling probability increases as the energy of the particle increases. This behavior is expected because, the higher the energy is, the lower the difference VoE is, thus it becomes easier for the tunneling to happen. In other words, the closer the state is to the top of the potential barrier, the easier it is to spread outside.

Try evaluating these tunneling probabilities for different heights of the walls (different Vo values). Do you expect the number of bound states to increase or decrease as Vo increases?

We are now ready to tackle "Particle in a box with two finite-potential external walls and a barrier between them"


This page titled Particle in a Finite Potential Box (Python Notebook) is shared under a not declared license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by Vinícius Wilian D. Cruzeiro, Xiang Gao, and Valeria D. Kleiman.

Support Center

How can we help?

PYTHON Session: NOT STARTED