Skip to main content
Chemistry LibreTexts

Extra Credit 28

  • Page ID
    82837
  • \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    ( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)

    \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)

    \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorA}[1]{\vec{#1}}      % arrow\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorAt}[1]{\vec{\text{#1}}}      % arrow\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorB}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorC}[1]{\textbf{#1}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorD}[1]{\overrightarrow{#1}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorDt}[1]{\overrightarrow{\text{#1}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectE}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{\mathbf {#1}}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)

    \(\newcommand{\avec}{\mathbf a}\) \(\newcommand{\bvec}{\mathbf b}\) \(\newcommand{\cvec}{\mathbf c}\) \(\newcommand{\dvec}{\mathbf d}\) \(\newcommand{\dtil}{\widetilde{\mathbf d}}\) \(\newcommand{\evec}{\mathbf e}\) \(\newcommand{\fvec}{\mathbf f}\) \(\newcommand{\nvec}{\mathbf n}\) \(\newcommand{\pvec}{\mathbf p}\) \(\newcommand{\qvec}{\mathbf q}\) \(\newcommand{\svec}{\mathbf s}\) \(\newcommand{\tvec}{\mathbf t}\) \(\newcommand{\uvec}{\mathbf u}\) \(\newcommand{\vvec}{\mathbf v}\) \(\newcommand{\wvec}{\mathbf w}\) \(\newcommand{\xvec}{\mathbf x}\) \(\newcommand{\yvec}{\mathbf y}\) \(\newcommand{\zvec}{\mathbf z}\) \(\newcommand{\rvec}{\mathbf r}\) \(\newcommand{\mvec}{\mathbf m}\) \(\newcommand{\zerovec}{\mathbf 0}\) \(\newcommand{\onevec}{\mathbf 1}\) \(\newcommand{\real}{\mathbb R}\) \(\newcommand{\twovec}[2]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\ctwovec}[2]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\threevec}[3]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cthreevec}[3]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\fourvec}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cfourvec}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\fivevec}[5]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \\ #5 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cfivevec}[5]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \\ #5 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\mattwo}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{rr}#1 \amp #2 \\ #3 \amp #4 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\laspan}[1]{\text{Span}\{#1\}}\) \(\newcommand{\bcal}{\cal B}\) \(\newcommand{\ccal}{\cal C}\) \(\newcommand{\scal}{\cal S}\) \(\newcommand{\wcal}{\cal W}\) \(\newcommand{\ecal}{\cal E}\) \(\newcommand{\coords}[2]{\left\{#1\right\}_{#2}}\) \(\newcommand{\gray}[1]{\color{gray}{#1}}\) \(\newcommand{\lgray}[1]{\color{lightgray}{#1}}\) \(\newcommand{\rank}{\operatorname{rank}}\) \(\newcommand{\row}{\text{Row}}\) \(\newcommand{\col}{\text{Col}}\) \(\renewcommand{\row}{\text{Row}}\) \(\newcommand{\nul}{\text{Nul}}\) \(\newcommand{\var}{\text{Var}}\) \(\newcommand{\corr}{\text{corr}}\) \(\newcommand{\len}[1]{\left|#1\right|}\) \(\newcommand{\bbar}{\overline{\bvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\bhat}{\widehat{\bvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\bperp}{\bvec^\perp}\) \(\newcommand{\xhat}{\widehat{\xvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\vhat}{\widehat{\vvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\uhat}{\widehat{\uvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\what}{\widehat{\wvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\Sighat}{\widehat{\Sigma}}\) \(\newcommand{\lt}{<}\) \(\newcommand{\gt}{>}\) \(\newcommand{\amp}{&}\) \(\definecolor{fillinmathshade}{gray}{0.9}\)

    Q17.4.1

    For the standard cell potentials given here, determine the ΔG° for the cell in kJ.

    1. 0.000 V, n = 2
    2. +0.434 V, n = 2
    3. −2.439 V, n = 1

    S17.4.1

    In this question we must find standard gibbs free energy (ΔG°) when being given voltage and number of electrons transferred. We can solve these problems using an equation relating the two values:

    \[\Delta G^{\circ}-n\cdot F\cdot E^{\circ}\]

    For each problem we are given E° (cell potential), n (number of moles of electrons transferred), and F (faraday's constant = 96.485 kJ/V*mol). Thus, we can plug in our known values into the equation to solve for ΔG°.

    1. First begin by listing the given values:

    E°= 0.000 V, n = 2, F = 96.485 Kj/V*mol

    Now plug into the known equation:

    \[\Delta G^{\circ}=-(2 mol)\cdot (96.485 \frac{kj}{mol\cdot V})\cdot (0.00V)\]

    Since our E° is 0, it is easy to see that the product of our given values will also be 0. Thus, we know that our ΔG° will also be 0.00 kJ

    2. Once again, we begin by listing the given values.

    E° = 0.434 V, n = 2, F = 96.485 kJ/V*mol

    We can plug into the known equation, making sure that the units of every value will cancel out to leave us with kJ:

    \[\Delta G^{\circ}=-(2 mol)\cdot (96.485 \frac{kj}{mol\cdot V})\cdot (0.0434V)\]

    We can see that the mol of electrons will cancel with the mols from faraday's constant, and the volts from our cell potential will

    also cancel out with the volts from faraday's constant, leaving us with kJ in the final answer

    ΔG° = -83.75 kJ Do not forget the negative sign!

    3. Once again, we can solve the same way, but this time our E° is negative:

    E°= -2.439 V, n = 1, F = 96.485 Kj/V*mol

    \[\Delta G^{\circ}=-(1 mol)\cdot (96.485 \frac{kj}{mol\cdot V})\cdot (-2.439V)\]

    ΔG° = 235.33 kJ The negative signs from the equation and from our E° cancel out to generate a positive ΔG°

    Q12.1.1

    What is the difference between average rate, initial rate, and instantaneous rate?

    S12.1.1

    A rate is a measurement of how something changes over time. In the context of chemistry, this can relate to concentration, voltage, enthalpy, etc. Understanding rate leads to an understanding of how chemistry can change over time. First, the instantaneous rate is the specific rate of change at a certain point in time. This point in time can be at the beginning, end, or anywhere in between the start and end of a functions rate. The initial rate is this very instantaneous rate at the beginning of a function; hence it is the "initial". Finally, average rate is not the rate at a single point, but rather the collection of all rates over a certain period of time. It is the mean value of all of the rates of a certain function over a specified period of time.

    Q12.4.19

    Nitroglycerine is an extremely sensitive explosive. In a series of carefully controlled experiments, samples of the explosive were heated to 160 °C and their first-order decomposition studied. Determine the average rate constants for each experiment using the following data:

    Initial [C3H5N3O9] (M) 4.88 3.52 2.29 1.81 5.33 4.05 2.95 1.72
    t (s) 300 300 300 300 180 180 180 180
    % Decomposed 52.0 52.9 53.2 53.9 34.6 35.9 36.0 35.4

    S12.4.19

    We are asked to find rate constants for experiments in which we are given initial concentrations, time, percent decomposition, and the fact that this is a first order reaction. Using this information, we are able to use the rate law equations for first order reactions in order to determine rate constants.

    The rate law for First Order reactions is:

    \[ln[A]_{f}=-kt+ln[A]_{0}\]

    [A]f = final concentration

    [A]0 = initial concentration

    t = time

    k = rate constant

    Looking at the equation, the only unknowns are final concentration and the rate constant. However, since we are given initial concentrations and percent decomposition, we can find the final concentrations as the percent decomposition determines how much of the initial concentration will be remaining. Thus, for the first experiment we can find the final concentration:

    \[[A]_{i}\cdot percentdecomposed=(4.88M)(0.52)=2.54M\]

    We know that 2.54 M of our initial concentration was decomposed, so we can subtract it from the initial concentration to find the remaining concentration:

    4.88 M - 2.54 M = 2.34 M

    Now we know that the initial concentration is 4.88 M, final concentration is 2.54 M, and time is 300 s. The only unknown is the rate constant, so we can manipulate the rate law reaction to solve for the rate constant:

    ln[A]f = -kt + ln[A]0

    ln[A]f - ln[A]0 = -kt We can subtract ln[A]0 from both sides of the equation

    -[(ln[A]f - ln[A]0 )/t] = k The final step is to divide both sides by -t, and now we have isolated k and can plug in our known values.

    So we find the equation solving for k:

    \[k=-\frac{ln[A]_{f}-ln[A]_{0}}{t}\]

    We can now plug in our known values, starting with the first trial:

    k = -((ln[2.34] - ln[4.88])/300)

    \[k=-\frac{ln[2.34]-ln[4.88]}{t}\]

    k = 2.45 x 10-3 s-1 The units are s-1 since this is a first order reaction, as M/(s*M) = 1/s

    This process can be repeated for each given equation to find the final concentration, and then plugging into the rate law equation that isolates K.

    Here is the second experiment following the same steps.

    We know initial concentration is 3.52 M, % decomposition is 52.9%, and time is 300 seconds.

    (3.52 M)(0.529) = 1.86 M

    3.52 M - 1.86 M = 1.66 M This is our final concentration. We can now plug into the equation we solved for in the first part.

    \[k=-\frac{ln[1.66]-ln[3.52]}{t}\]

    k = 2.51 x 10-3 s-1

    The process can be repeated for each experiment, and will yield these rate constants:

    Initial (M) 4.88 3.52 2.29 1.81 5.33 4.05 2.95 1.72
    k (s-1) 2.45 x 10-3 2.51 x 10-3 2.54 x 10-3 2.58 x 10-3 2.35 x 10-3 2.44 x 10-3 2.47 x 10-3 2.43 x 10-3

    Q21.3.3

    Complete each of the following equations by adding the missing species:

    1. \[_{13}^{27}\textrm{Al}+_{2}^{4}\textrm{He}\rightarrow ?+_{0}^{1}\textrm{n}\]
    2. \[_{94}^{239}\textrm{Pu}+?\rightarrow_{96}^{242}\textrm{Cm}+_{0}^{1}\textrm{n}\]
    3. \[_{7}^{14}\textrm{N}+_{2}^{4}\textrm{He}\rightarrow ?+_{1}^{1}\textrm{H}\]
    4. \[_{92}^{235}\textrm{U}\rightarrow ?+_{55}^{135}\textrm{Cs}+_{0}^{1}\textrm{n}\]

    S21.3.3

    In this problem we need to do some "nuclear accounting" by filling in the correct species in each given nuclear reaction. With a good understanding of alpha, beta, and gamma particles, this task will be a lot easier.

    1. To solve these problems, it is easiest to find total mass numbers and atomic numbers on both sides of the equations, and then compare to see what is missing.

    \[_{13}^{27}\textrm{Al}+_{2}^{4}\textrm{He}\rightarrow ?+_{0}^{1}\textrm{n}\]

    Total Mass # on left side: 27+4 = 31

    Total Atomic # on left side: 13 + 2 = 15

    We know the the mass # on the right, x, plus the mass of the neutron, 1, is equal to the total masses on the left, 31.

    So 1 + x = 31 x = 30

    Same steps for the atomic # on the right, y, find that

    0 + y = 15 y = 15

    Thus the missing species has these masses, and from the periodic table using the atomic number we can find that the element is Phosphorus.

    \[_{15}^{30}\textrm{P}\]

    2. Here we see the missing item is on the left, so we find the sums on the right.

    Total mass on right= 242 + 1 = 243

    Atomic number on right = 96 + 0 = 96

    From the left side we can see that

    239 + x = 243 so x = 4 for mass number

    94 + y = 96 so y = 2 for atomic number

    From the atomic number 2 we look at the periodic table and see that the element is Helium

    \[_{2}^{4}\textrm{He}\]

    3.

    Mass on left = 14 + 4 = 18

    Atomic number on left = 7 + 2 = 9

    We know that for the mass number (x) on the right

    18 = x + 1 x = 17

    And for the atomic number (y) on the right

    9 = y + 1 y = 8

    So the element with atomic number 8 is Oxygen

    \[_{8}^{17}\textrm{O}\]

    4.

    The total mass on the left is 235 and the atomic number is 92.

    From the right we know that the mass number = x + 135 + 1 = x + 136

    And that the atomic number = y + 55 + 0 = y + 55

    235 = x + 136 x = 99 We can equate the left side to the ride side of the equations to solve for the missing mass and atomic numbers, x and y.

    92 = y + 55 y = 37

    With atomic number 37, this element is Rubidium

    \[_{37}^{99}\textrm{Rb}\]

    Q21.7.5

    Given specimens neon-24 (t1/2=3.38 min) and bismuth-211 (t1/2=2.14 min) of equal mass, which one would have greater activity and why?

    S21.7.5

    In this problem we are given half lives and mass numbers of two species and need to calculate the activities of both in order to determine which would be larger. Looking at the half life and activity equations, we know that

    t1/2 = 0.693/y and Activity = Ny where N = mass number/number of atoms

    (let y = lambda)

    Since we know the half lives, we can solve for y and then plug into the activity equation to find activities of both elements.

    First, rewrite the half live equation:

    y = 0.693/t1/2

    Now plug in the given half lives of both

    Neon-24 Bismuth-211

    y = 0.693/(3.38 min) y = 0.693/(2.14 min)

    y = 0.205 min-1 y = 0.324 min-1

    With lambda and the mass numbers, we can solve for activity using the above equation:

    Activity= (0.205min-1)(24) Activity = (0.324min-1)(211)

    Neon-24: 4.92 Bismuth-211: 68.4

    Now we have the activities for both, and we can see that Bismuth - 211 has the bigger activity, most likely as a result of its larger mass number.

    Q20.4.18

    You have built a galvanic cell using an iron nail, a solution of FeCl2, and an SHE. When the cell is connected, you notice that the iron nail begins to corrode. What else do you observe? Under standard conditions, what is Ecell?

    S20.4.18

    The reason you notice the iron corroding can be seen in the activity series table. Iron has a lower reduction potential than Chlorine, which means it is more likely to be oxidized than the Chlorine. Thus, at the anode the oxidation of iron occurs. The other thing that you would notice would be the formation of chlorine in the other container. Since the iron is being oxidized at the anode, the chlorine is being reduced at the cathode. In order to find Ecell, we have to subtract the cell potentials as such: E(cathode) - E(anode).

    Looking at the activity series we can find these values for Chlorine and Iron.

    Cl: Cl2(g) + 2e- -> 2Cl- (aq) E = 1.358 V

    Fe: Fe3+(aq) + e- -> Fe2+ (aq) E = 0.771 V

    Ecell = 1.358 V - 0.771 V = 0.587 V

    Q20.9.3

    Why are mixtures of molten salts, rather than a pure salt, generally used during electrolysis?

    S20.9.3

    To answer this question, we must think about what is occurring during electrolysis: and that is the movement of electrons. Thus, we can conclude that there must be some difference between how electrons can move in molten salts versus in pure salt. In reality, pure salts do not conduct electricity. Thus, they would act very poorly in an electrolysis setup, as ions would not be able to traverse through the pure salts. On the other hand, molten salts do conduct electricity. When heating the salts, molecules are broken down into ions, which allows for free movement. This movement is key to having a successful electrolysis setup.

    Q20.9.1

    Why might an electrochemical reaction that is thermodynamically favored require an overvoltage to occur?

    S20.9.1

    Overvoltage occurs when there is a requirement for additional voltage to be added to an electrolytic cell in order for the rate of reaction to occur as it would in an ideal setting. Although a reaction may already be thermodynamically favored prior to the additional voltage, there a few reasons that it may still be necessary. First, although a reaction may be thermodynamically favored and thus exothermic, it may be advancing at a less than optimal rate due to high activation energy. Overvoltage can aid in lowering the activation energy, and thus increasing the rate, all while the reaction remains thermodynamically favored. Additionally, in some reactions in which gases are produced, the flow of electrons is slowed by the gases being formed. Once again, overvoltage can alleviate the slower rate even though the reaction was already favorable.


    Extra Credit 28 is shared under a CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by LibreTexts.

    • Was this article helpful?