# 9.7.1: Concentrations as Conversion Factors

- Last updated

- Save as PDF

- Page ID
- 236002

Learning Objective

- Apply concentration units as conversion factors.

Concentration can be a conversion factor between the amount of solute and the amount of solution or solvent (depending on the definition of the concentration unit). As such, concentrations can be useful in a variety of stoichiometry problems. In many cases, it is best to use the original definition of the concentration unit; it is that definition that provides the conversion factor.

A simple example of using a concentration unit as a conversion factor is one in which we use the definition of the concentration unit and rearrange; we can do the calculation again as a unit conversion, rather than as a definition. For example, suppose we ask how many moles of solute are present in 0.108 L of a 0.887 M NaCl solution. Because 0.887 M means 0.887 mol/L, we can use this second expression for the concentration as a conversion factor:

\[0.108\cancel{L\, NaCl}\times \frac{0.887\, mol\, NaCl}{\cancel{L\, NaCl}}=0.0958\, mol\, NaCl\nonumber \]

(There is an understood 1 in the denominator of the conversion factor.) If we used the definition approach, we get the same answer, but now we are using conversion factor skills. Like any other conversion factor that relates two different types of units, the reciprocal of the concentration can be also used as a conversion factor.

Example \(\PageIndex{1}\)

Using concentration as a conversion factor, how many liters of 2.35 M CuSO_{4} are needed to obtain 4.88 mol of CuSO_{4}?

**Solution**

This is a one-step conversion, but the concentration must be written as the reciprocal for the units to work out:

\[4.88\cancel{mol\, CuSO_{4}}\times \frac{1\, L}{2.35\cancel{mol}}=2.08\, L\, of \, solution\nonumber \]

Exercise \(\PageIndex{1}\)

Using concentration as a conversion factor, how many liters of 0.0444 M CH_{2}O are needed to obtain 0.0773 mol of CH_{2}O?

**Answer:**- 1.74 L

Of course, once quantities in moles are available, another conversion can give the mass of the substance, using molar mass as a conversion factor.

Example \(\PageIndex{2}\)

What mass of solute is present in 0.765 L of 1.93 M NaOH?

**Solution**

This is a two-step conversion, first using concentration as a conversion factor to determine the number of moles and then the molar mass of NaOH (40.0 g/mol) to convert to mass:

\[0.765\cancel{L}\times \frac{1.93\cancel{mol\, NaOH}}{\cancel{L\, solution}}\times \frac{40.0g\, NaOH}{1\cancel{mol\, NaOH}}=59.1\, g\, NaOH\nonumber \]

Exercise \(\PageIndex{2}\)

What mass of solute is present in 1.08 L of 0.0578 M H_{2}SO_{4}?

**Answer**- 6.12 g

More complex stoichiometry problems using balanced chemical reactions can also use concentrations as conversion factors. For example, suppose the following equation represents a chemical reaction:

\[\ce{2AgNO3(aq) + CaCl2(aq) → 2AgCl(s) + Ca(NO3)2(aq)}\nonumber \]

If we wanted to know what volume of 0.555 M CaCl_{2} would react with 1.25 mol of AgNO_{3}, we first use the balanced chemical equation to determine the number of moles of CaCl_{2} that would react and then use concentration to convert to liters of solution:

\[1.25\cancel{mol\, AgNO_{3}}\times \frac{1\cancel{mol\, CaCl_{2}}}{2\cancel{mol\, AgNO_{3}}}\times \frac{1L\, solution}{0.555\cancel{mol\, CaCl_{2}}}=1.13\, L\, CaCl_{2}\nonumber \]

This can be extended by starting with the mass of one reactant, instead of moles of a reactant.

Example \(\PageIndex{3}\)

What volume of 0.0995 M Al(NO_{3})_{3} will react with 3.66 g of Ag according to the following chemical equation?

\[\ce{3Ag(s) + Al(NO3)3(aq) → 3AgNO3 + Al(s)}\nonumber \]

**Solution**

Here, we first must convert the mass of Ag to moles before using the balanced chemical equation and then the definition of molarity as a conversion factor:

\[3.66\cancel{g\, Ag}\times \frac{1\cancel{mol\, Ag}}{107.97\cancel{g\, Ag}}\times \frac{1\cancel{mol\, Al(NO_{3})_{3}}}{3\cancel{mol\, Ag}}\times \frac{1L\, solution}{0.0995\cancel{mol\, Al(NO_{3})_{3}}}=0.114\, L\nonumber \]

The strikeouts show how the units cancel.

Exercise \(\PageIndex{3}\)

What volume of 0.512 M NaOH will react with 17.9 g of H_{2}C_{2}O_{4}(s) according to the following chemical equation?

\[\ce{H2C2O4(s) + 2NaOH(aq) → Na2C2O4(aq) + 2H2O(ℓ)}\nonumber \]

**Answer:**- 0.777 L

We can extend our skills even further by recognizing that we can relate quantities of one solution to quantities of another solution. Knowing the volume and concentration of a solution containing one reactant, we can determine how much of another solution of another reactant will be needed using the balanced chemical equation.

Example \(\PageIndex{4}\)

A student takes a precisely measured sample, called an *aliquot*, of 10.00 mL of a solution of FeCl_{3}. The student carefully adds 0.1074 M Na_{2}C_{2}O_{4} until all the Fe^{3+}(aq) has precipitated as Fe_{2}(C_{2}O_{4})_{3}(s). Using a precisely measured tube called a burette, the student finds that 9.04 mL of the Na_{2}C_{2}O_{4} solution was added to completely precipitate the Fe^{3+}(aq). What was the concentration of the FeCl_{3} in the original solution? (A precisely measured experiment like this, which is meant to determine the amount of a substance in a sample, is called a *titration*.) The balanced chemical equation is as follows:

\[\ce{2FeCl3(aq) + 3Na2C2O4(aq) → Fe2(C2O4)3(s) + 6NaCl(aq)}\nonumber \]

**Solution**

First we need to determine the number of moles of Na_{2}C_{2}O_{4} that reacted. We will convert the volume to liters and then use the concentration of the solution as a conversion factor:

\[9.04\cancel{mL}\times \frac{1\cancel{L}}{1000\cancel{mL}}\times \frac{0.1074mol\, Na_{2}C_{2}O_{4}}{\cancel{L}}=0.000971\, mol\, Na_{2}C_{2}O_{4}\nonumber \]

Now we will use the balanced chemical equation to determine the number of moles of Fe^{3+}(aq) that were present in the initial aliquot:

\[0.000971\cancel{mol\, Na_{2}C_{2}O_{4}}\times \frac{2mol\, FeCl_{3}}{3\cancel{molNa_{2}C_{2}O_{4}}}=0.000647mol\, FeCl_{3}\nonumber \]

Then we determine the concentration of FeCl_{3} in the original solution. Converting 10.00 mL into liters (0.01000 L), we use the definition of molarity directly:

\[M=\frac{mol}{L}=\frac{0.000647mol\, FeCl_{3}}{0.01000L}=0.0647M\, FeCl_{3}\nonumber \]

Exercise \(\PageIndex{4}\)

A student titrates 25.00 mL of H_{3}PO_{4} with 0.0987 M KOH. She uses 54.06 mL to complete the chemical reaction. What is the concentration of H_{3}PO_{4}?

\[\ce{H3PO4(aq) + 3KOH(aq) → K3PO4(aq) + 3H2O}\nonumber \]

**Answer:**- 0.0711 M

We have used molarity exclusively as the concentration of interest, but that will not always be the case. The next example shows a different concentration unit being used.

Example \(\PageIndex{5}\):

H_{2}O_{2} is used to determine the amount of Mn according to this balanced chemical equation:

\[\ce{2MnO4^{-}(aq) + 5H2O2(aq) + 6H+(aq) → 2Mn2+(aq) + 5O2(g) + 8H2O(ℓ)}\nonumber \]

What mass of 3.00% m/m H_{2}O_{2} solution is needed to react with 0.355 mol of MnO_{4}^{−}(aq)?

**Solution**

Because we are given an initial amount in moles, all we need to do is use the balanced chemical equation to determine the number of moles of H_{2}O_{2} and then convert to find the mass of H_{2}O_{2}. Knowing that the H_{2}O_{2} solution is 3.00% by mass, we can determine the mass of solution needed:

\[3.55\cancel{mol\, MnO_{4}^{-}}\times \frac{5\cancel{mol\, H_{2}O_{2}}}{2\cancel{molMnO_{4}^{-}}}\times \frac{34.02\cancel{g\, H_{2}O_{2}}}{\cancel{mol\, H_{2}O_{2}}}\times \frac{100g\; solution}{3\cancel{g\, H_{2}O_{2}}}=1006g\; sol\nonumber \]

The first conversion factor comes from the balanced chemical equation, the second conversion factor is the molar mass of H_{2}O_{2}, and the third conversion factor comes from the definition of percentage concentration by mass.

Exercise \(\PageIndex{5}\)

Use the balanced chemical reaction for MnO_{4}^{−} and H_{2}O_{2} to determine what mass of O_{2} is produced if 258 g of 3.00% m/m H_{2}O_{2} is reacted with MnO_{4}^{−}.

**Answer**- 7.28 g

## Summary

Know how to apply concentration units as conversion factors.