# Titration of a Weak Base with a Strong Acid

- Page ID
- 221878

\( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

\( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)

\( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)

\( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)

\( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)

\( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)

\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

\( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\)

\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

\( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)

\( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)

\( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\)

\( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)

\( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\)

\( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)

\( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)

\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)

\( \newcommand{\vectorA}[1]{\vec{#1}} % arrow\)

\( \newcommand{\vectorAt}[1]{\vec{\text{#1}}} % arrow\)

\( \newcommand{\vectorB}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

\( \newcommand{\vectorC}[1]{\textbf{#1}} \)

\( \newcommand{\vectorD}[1]{\overrightarrow{#1}} \)

\( \newcommand{\vectorDt}[1]{\overrightarrow{\text{#1}}} \)

\( \newcommand{\vectE}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{\mathbf {#1}}}} \)

\( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

\( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)

\(\newcommand{\avec}{\mathbf a}\) \(\newcommand{\bvec}{\mathbf b}\) \(\newcommand{\cvec}{\mathbf c}\) \(\newcommand{\dvec}{\mathbf d}\) \(\newcommand{\dtil}{\widetilde{\mathbf d}}\) \(\newcommand{\evec}{\mathbf e}\) \(\newcommand{\fvec}{\mathbf f}\) \(\newcommand{\nvec}{\mathbf n}\) \(\newcommand{\pvec}{\mathbf p}\) \(\newcommand{\qvec}{\mathbf q}\) \(\newcommand{\svec}{\mathbf s}\) \(\newcommand{\tvec}{\mathbf t}\) \(\newcommand{\uvec}{\mathbf u}\) \(\newcommand{\vvec}{\mathbf v}\) \(\newcommand{\wvec}{\mathbf w}\) \(\newcommand{\xvec}{\mathbf x}\) \(\newcommand{\yvec}{\mathbf y}\) \(\newcommand{\zvec}{\mathbf z}\) \(\newcommand{\rvec}{\mathbf r}\) \(\newcommand{\mvec}{\mathbf m}\) \(\newcommand{\zerovec}{\mathbf 0}\) \(\newcommand{\onevec}{\mathbf 1}\) \(\newcommand{\real}{\mathbb R}\) \(\newcommand{\twovec}[2]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\ctwovec}[2]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\threevec}[3]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cthreevec}[3]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\fourvec}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cfourvec}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\fivevec}[5]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \\ #5 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cfivevec}[5]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \\ #5 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\mattwo}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{rr}#1 \amp #2 \\ #3 \amp #4 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\laspan}[1]{\text{Span}\{#1\}}\) \(\newcommand{\bcal}{\cal B}\) \(\newcommand{\ccal}{\cal C}\) \(\newcommand{\scal}{\cal S}\) \(\newcommand{\wcal}{\cal W}\) \(\newcommand{\ecal}{\cal E}\) \(\newcommand{\coords}[2]{\left\{#1\right\}_{#2}}\) \(\newcommand{\gray}[1]{\color{gray}{#1}}\) \(\newcommand{\lgray}[1]{\color{lightgray}{#1}}\) \(\newcommand{\rank}{\operatorname{rank}}\) \(\newcommand{\row}{\text{Row}}\) \(\newcommand{\col}{\text{Col}}\) \(\renewcommand{\row}{\text{Row}}\) \(\newcommand{\nul}{\text{Nul}}\) \(\newcommand{\var}{\text{Var}}\) \(\newcommand{\corr}{\text{corr}}\) \(\newcommand{\len}[1]{\left|#1\right|}\) \(\newcommand{\bbar}{\overline{\bvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\bhat}{\widehat{\bvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\bperp}{\bvec^\perp}\) \(\newcommand{\xhat}{\widehat{\xvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\vhat}{\widehat{\vvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\uhat}{\widehat{\uvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\what}{\widehat{\wvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\Sighat}{\widehat{\Sigma}}\) \(\newcommand{\lt}{<}\) \(\newcommand{\gt}{>}\) \(\newcommand{\amp}{&}\) \(\definecolor{fillinmathshade}{gray}{0.9}\)Data obtained through the process of titration can be used to compute the molarity and the correlated acidity of a solution at various times of the titration. The initial and final volumes of the analyte and titrant solutions, as well as the pH, or measure of acidity, are essential in calculating the total number of moles of analyte present. Once this information is determined, the molarity of the analyte, which was unknown before the titration, can then be computed, because its volume was measured beforehand. However, chemists are often interested in the data collected at various points during the titration as well, not just at the beginning and the end. These data can then be translated to points on a graph, resulting in an informational titration curve.

## Introduction

Chemists are typically interested in calculating volume and acidity data for the following critical points: at the starting point before any titrant is added, at the midpoint, at a point before the equivalence point (excluding the initial condition), at the equivalence point, and past the equivalence point.

**Figure 1. Conventional setup of a lab titration.** In this particular case, the weak base (colored in green), is being titrated by the strong acid (colored in red). In a typical titration, a few drops of indicator, such as phenolphthaelein, is added. The indicator causes the solution in the flask to undergo a color change that signifies the equivalence point has been reached. Image created by Christine Chang.

## Before titrant is added

Before the stopcock on the buret containing the strong acid is released, the analyte in the flask is completely unreacted. Calculating the pH of this initial solution allows chemists to analyze the changes in acidity, as well as the acidic strength of the titrant after the titration is complete. To calculate the pH, an ICE (Initial, Change, Equilibrium) table is used. When titrating weak bases, water is always a reactant in this initial step, and its conjugate base, hydroxide, in the products.

**Table 1**. ICE table at initial conditions. Drawing a chart like the one above is a useful step in calculating the concentration of hydroxide before any acid is added. The concentration can then be used to determine the starting pH. Since the quantity of water does not directly affect the reaction, its column is left blank. Table created by Christine Chang.At this point, there is no BH^{+} or OH^{-} in the analyte solution—the molarities of these species are zero, as observed in the ICE table. Because the stopcock has not yet been released, there is no acid in the flask to react with the base and yield products BH^{+} and OH^{-}. Once the strong acid is released into the flask, however, the BH^{+} and OH^{-} begin to form.

The next step in determining the initial concentration of OH- is to use the information from the ICE table to set up an equilibrium expression with K_{b}. K_{b }is used in this case, instead of K_{a}, because the analyte being titrated is a base.

\({K_b} = {\dfrac{x^2}{[B] - x}}\)

Since K_{b} and [B] are given, the only variable left to solve for is x, which is equal to [OH^{-}]. This requires the quadratic equation:

\(\dfrac{-b \pm \sqrt{b^2 - 4ac}}{2a}\)

Once x is obtained, the pOH can be determined using the relation \(pOH = -log x\). The pH can then be derived from the pOH using \(pH = 14 - pOH\).

## At the midpoint

The midpoint is when the **moles of strong acid added** = **½ moles of base B** initially in the flask. In other words, at the midpoint, half the analyte has been titrated. Because the number of moles of the base is known (determined by measured volume multiplied by molarity), and the molarities of both the titrant and analyte are known, the volumes of acid and base at the midpoint can be calculated as follows:

\(L \; strong \; acid = \dfrac{mol \; strong \; acid \; added}{Molarity \; strong \; acid}\)

or in simpler terms:

\(\dfrac{1}{M} = \dfrac{L}{mol}\), and \(L = mol{\dfrac{L}{mol}}\)

Graphically, the midpoint is the first point at which the curve has zero slope, indicated in Figure 2.

**Figure 2. Locating the midpoint on a titration curve.**The midpoint is reached when enough titrant has been released to allow half the analyte to be neutralized. On the curve, that point is roughly the midpoint between the starting point and the equivalence point, or where the curve levels out. Image created by Christine Chang.Lastly, at the midpoint, pOH = pK_{b}. This makes it easy to calculate pH, because K_{b} is given.

## Titrant added before the equivalence point

Chemists often calculate the acidity of the analyte at some point between the initial and the equivalence points to gauge the precise formation of the titration curve. Suppose 50 mL of 6 M strong acid is added to a base. Without looking at any graph, a chemist can determine whether or not he has passed the equivalence point.

The molarity of the acid is given, so the number of moles titrated can be calculated:

0.050 L × 6 mol/L = 0.3 moles of strong acid added thus far.

- If 0.3 < initial moles of base, the equivalence point has not yet been reached.
- If 0.3 = initial moles of base, the titration is at the equivalence point.
- If 0.3 > initial moles of base, the titration is past the equivalence point

If the equivalence point has not yet been reached, more acid is required. An ICE table is helpful in calculating the volume of B that has not been titrated at this point.

**Table 2. ICE table before equivalence point is reached.** The reaction for the ICE table for the titration before the equivalence point is the same as the reaction at the initial point. Instead of subtracting a variable x from the reactant B, the moles of strong acid titrated is subtracted.

Notice that this time the variable x is not used, because the number of moles of titrant added is already known. Also note that the units are consistent across all values used in the ICE table. In an ICE table, either moles must be used for everything, or molarity for everything. Any inconsistency in units will result in incorrect values. The green ICE table above uses moles (the red ICE table in Step 1 used molarity).

Because there is no variable in the ICE table before the equivalence point, the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation can be directly applied to to find pOH.

\[pOH=pK_b+log\dfrac{[BH^+]}{[B]}\]

Because the solution being titrated is a weak base, the pOH form of the Henderson Hasselbalch equation is used. If the analyte was an acid, however, this alternate form would have been used:

\[pH=pK_a+log\dfrac{[A^-]}{[HA]}\]

The two should not be confused. The latter formula would likely be used in the titration of a weak acid with a strong base. If moles were used in the ICE table, as in the table above, the **values must be converted*** to molarities* before being inserted into the Henderson Hasselbalch equation. When converting to molarity, compute as follows:

\(Molarity \; BH^+ = {\dfrac{moles \; BH^+}{V_{titrant \; added} + V_{analyte}}}\)

The same must be done for base B. Do not forget the volume of titrant added in the denominator (liters of solution).

## At the equivalence point

The equivalence point is defined as the point where the moles of strong acid added = initial moles of base B in solution. Graphically, the equivalence point is where the curve is most vertical.

**Figure 3. Comparing equivalence point with midpoint.**It is apparent by studying a graph that the equivalence point is distinctly different from the midpoint. On the curve, the equivalence point is located where the graph is most steep. There is a fast and abrupt change of pH around this point, which can be observed by the color change the takes place during titration.

At the equivalence point, an ICE table is required to determine volume and acidity. At this point in the titration, however, the reaction is flipped. This is because the base B has been __fully titrated__, which means adding more titrant will not yield the same products. The reaction goes backwards.

**Table 3. ICE table for reaction at equivalence point.** The reaction at the equivalence point essentially goes backwards because all the base available to be titrated has been titrated. Think of the titration as an escalator. Once the highest level, or "equivalence point," is reached, the only option is to take a U-turn and go back down the other escalator lane.

At the equivalence point, there is no more of base B. Hence, “reactant” is now considered the BH^{+} that formed from titrating B with strong acid. When calculating [BH^{+}], do not forget to divide number of moles by the volume of base analyte PLUS **TITRANT added**.

Because the neutralization of the starting base is complete, the solution becomes increasingly acidic from this point on (as more acidic titrant is added. This is indicated by the hydronium in the product. Using an analogy, the titration can be thought of as a rising escalator. Once a person reaches the very top, or "equivalence point," he or she can only head back down in the opposite direciton. Likewise, at the equivalence point, the fully reacted reaction takes a "U-turn"—the former product becomes the reactant, and vice versa. Similar to step one, calculating the molarity of the products entails setting up an equilibrium expression with K_{a} (not K_{b} this time, because hydronium, which is acidic, is being produced instead of hydroxide, which is basic). Hint: K_{b} is given, and \( K_w = 1.0 \times 10^{-14} \)

\[ K_a = \dfrac{K_w}{K_b} \]

## Past the Equivalence Point

Suppose 100 mL of the 6 M strong acid titrant, which comes out to 0.6 moles, is added. If that number is greater than the number of moles of base B, the titration is past the equivalence point. To find the pH, first simply find the moles of *excess* H_{3}O^{+}. The excess can be calculated by subtracting initial moles of analyte B from moles of acidic titrant added, assuming a one-to-one stoichiometric ratio. Once the number of moles of excess H_{3}O^{+} is determined, [H_{3}O^{+}] can be calculated.

\[ [H_3O^+] = \dfrac{moles \; excess \; H_3O^+}{V_{titrant \; added} + V_{analyte}}\]

The denominator ({V_{titrant \; added} + V_{analyte}} is the total volume of the solution in the flask.

Once the [H_{3}O^{+}] is determined, pH can be calculated with the knowledge that \(pH = -\log[H_{3}O^{+}]\)

Example 1

You are given 90 mL of 0.6 M of the weak base NH_{3} (K_{b} = 1.8 × 10^{-5)}, and 1 M of the strong acid titrant HCl.

- What is the pH before any acid is added?
- What volume of acid (in mL) is needed to reach the equivalence (stoichiometric) point?
- What volume of acid (in mL) is needed to reach the halfway point where pH = pK
_{a}? - What is the pH after 50 mL of acid is added?
- What is the pH at the equivalence (stoichiometric) point?
- What is the pH after 60 mL of acid is added?

First, calculate the number of moles of base (analyte) present initially.

\[0.090 \; L \; base \; \times \dfrac{0.6 \; mol \; base}{L \; base \; solution} = 0.054 \; mol \; base\]

**a)** An ICE table helps determine the molarity of OH^{-}.

\(NH_3\) | \(H_2O\) | \(\rightleftharpoons\) | \(NH_4^+\) | \(OH^-\) | |

Initial | 0.6 M | - | 0 | 0 | |

Change | -x | - | +x | +x | |

Equilibrium | 0.6 - x | - | x | x |

\[1.8 \times 10^{-5} = \dfrac{x^2}{0.6 - x}\]

\[1.08 \times 10^{-5} - 1.8 \times 10^{-5x} - x^2 = 0\]

\[x = \dfrac{1.8 \times 10^{-5} \pm \sqrt{(1.8 \times 10^{-5})^2 - 4(-1)(1.08 \times 10^{-5})}}{2(-1)}\]

\(= \dfrac{1.8 \times 10^{-5} \pm 6.57 \times 10^{-3}}{-2} = -3.29 \times 10^{-3}, \; 3.28 \times 10^{-3} \; M \; OH^-\)

\[pOH = -log(3.28 \times 10^{-3}) = 2.5 \; pOH\]

\[pH = 14 - pOH = 14 - 2.5 = 11.5 \; pH\]

**b)** At the equivalence point, the number of moles of HCl added is equal to the initial number of moles of NH_{3}, because the analyte is completely neutralized.

\[0.054 \; mol \; HCl \times \dfrac{1 \; L \; HCl}{mol \; HCl} = 0.054 \; L \; HCl, \; or \; 54 \; mL \; HCl\]

**c)** At the midpoint, pOH = pK_{b}.

\(-log(1.8 \times 10^{-5}) = 4.74 \; pOH\)

\(pH = 14 - pOH = 14 - 4.74 = 9.26 \; pH\)

At the midpoint, the number of moles of HCl added equals half the initial number of moles of NH_{3}. In other words, the number of moles of HCl added at the midpoint is half of the number of moles of HCl added by the equivalence point. Hence:

\[\dfrac{1}{2}(0.054 \; L \; HCl \; added \; at \; equivalence \; point) = 0.027 \; moles \; HCl \; at \; midpoint \]

\[\text{Volume of acid needed} = 0.027\ mol\ HCl \times \dfrac{1\ L}{1\ mol\ HCl} = 0.027\ L\ HCl = 27\ mL\ HCl \]

**d)** First, find the moles of HCl in 50 mL of HCl.

\[0.05 \; L \; HCl \times \dfrac{mol \; HCl}{L \; HCl} = 0.05 \; mol \; HCl\]

\(NH_3\) | \(H_2O\) | \(\rightleftharpoons\) | \(NH_4^+\) | \(OH^-\) | |

Initial | 0.054 mol | - | 0 | 0 | |

Change | -0.050 mol | - | +0.050 mol | +0.050 mol | |

Equilibrium | 0.004 mol | - | 0.050 mol | 0.050 mol |

Because 50 mL of acid have been added, and we started out with 90 mL of analyte, there are a total of 140 mL of analyte solution at this point. Hence, the molarity of NH_{3} is the following:

\(\dfrac{0.004 \; mol \; NH_3}{0.140 \; L \; solution \; in \; flask}=0.0286 M\)

The molarity of NH_{4}^{+} is:

\(\dfrac{0.050 \; mol \; NH_4^{+}}{0.140 \; L \; solution \; in \; flask}=0.357 M\)

Now we can use the Henderson-Hasselbalch approximation:

\(pOH=pK_b+log\dfrac{NH_4^{+}}{NH_3}\)

\(pOH=4.74+log\dfrac{0.357}{0.0286}=5.84 \; pOH\)

\(pH=14-pOH=14-4.84=8.16\)

**e)** To find the pH at the equivalence point, first calculate the molarity of the NH_{4}^{+} in the flask at this point.

\(\dfrac{0.054 \; mol \; NH_4{^+}}{0.140 \; L \; analyte \; solution}=0.375M \; NH_4{^+}\)

\(K_a=\dfrac{K_w}{K_b}=\dfrac{1.0 \times 10^{-14}}{1.8 \times 10^{-5}}=5.56 \times 10^-10\)

\(NH_4^+\) | \(H_2O\) | \(\rightleftharpoons\) | \(NH_3\) | \(H_3O^+\) | |

Initial | 0.375 | -- | 0 | 0 | |

Change | -x | -- | +x | +x | |

Equilibrium | 0.375 -x | -- | x | x |

\(5.56 \times 10^{-10}=\dfrac{x^2}{0.375+x}\)

\(2.09 \times 10^{-10}+(5.56 \times 10^{-10})x-x^2=0\)

We can use the quadratic equation to solve for x:

\(x=\dfrac{-5.56 \times 10^{-10} \pm \sqrt{(5.56 \times 10^{-10})^2-4(-1)(2.09 \times 10^{-10})}}{2(-1)}\)

\(=\dfrac{-5.56 \times 10^{-10} \pm 2.89 \times 10^{-5}}{-2} = -1.45 \times 10^{-5}, \; 1.45 \times 10^{-5} \; M \; H_3O^+\)

\(pH=-log(1.45 \times 10^{-5})=4.84 \; pH\)

**f)** First, find the moles of HCl in 60 mL of HCl.

\(0.06 \; L \times \dfrac{mol\; HCl}{L \; HCl}=0.06 \; mol \; OH^-\)

Find the excess amount of HCl, or the amount added after neutralization has occurred.

0.054 moles of HCl reacted with the NH_{3} to neutralize it.

\(excess \; HCl=0.06-0.054=0.006 \; mol \; HCl\)

Now we need to find the molarity of HCl in the flask at this point. We started out with 90 mL of NH_{3} analyte in the flask, and added 60 mL. That gives a total of 150 mL, or 0.150 L of solution in the flask.

\(MOLARITY_{HCl \; in \; flask}=\dfrac{0.006 \; mol}{0.150 \; L \; solution}=0.04 \; M \; HCl\)

Because HCl dissociates into H_{3}O^{+}, equate [HCl] to [H_{3}O^{+}]. Now we have the information to determine pH.

\(pH=-log(0.04)=1.4 \; pH\)

Example 2

One titrates 100 ml of 1.00 M sodium chlorate(NaClO) with 1.00M HCl. What is the pH after you add 50 ml of acid? K_{b} for ClO^{-} = 3.6×10^{-7}.

**Two main steps**

- Do the stoichiometry to find how much base has been absorbed by the acid.
- Figure out the equilibrium concentrations of each species by doing an equilibrium problem.

*Reaction of weak base and strong acid.*

*H ^{+}_{(aq)} + ClO^{-}_{(aq)} -> HClO_{(aq)}*

- Start with 100 ml(1.00 M) = 0.100 moles of ClO
^{-}. - If you add 50ml(1.00 M) = 0.05 moles of HCl to the base, the reaction in the previous step will consume all of the H
^{+}, leaving 0.100 - 0.050 = 0.050 moles of ClO^{-}. - Because we added 50 ml of acid to 100 ml of base, we have a solution volume of 150 ml.
- The concentration of ClO
^{-}after adding the base is [ClO^{-}] = 0.050 moles/0.150 L = 0.333 M. - 0.050 moles of HClO also forms, thus the concentration of HClO is also 0.333 M.
- The solution above is a buffer of the weak acid HClO and the conjugate base ClO
^{-}. - Now we can solve for the pH of a buffer by using the Henderson-Hasselbalch approximation.

**References**

- Petrucci, Ralph H., et al. General Chemistry: Principles and Modern Applications.
- Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2007 http://cartage.org.lb/en/themes/Sciences/Chemistry/Inorganicchemistry/AcidsBases/Acidsbasesindex/weakbasetitration.htm http://www.chem.ubc.ca/courseware/pH/section14/content.html

## Contributors

- Christine Chang, Kelly Cox