5.2: Methods of Determining Reaction Order
 Page ID
 6425
\( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)
\( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{\!\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)
\( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)
( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)
\( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)
\( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\ #1 \}\)
\( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)
\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)
\( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\)
\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)
\( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)
\( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)
\( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\)
\( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)
\( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\)
\( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\ #1 \}\)
\( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)
\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)
\( \newcommand{\vectorA}[1]{\vec{#1}} % arrow\)
\( \newcommand{\vectorAt}[1]{\vec{\text{#1}}} % arrow\)
\( \newcommand{\vectorB}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)
\( \newcommand{\vectorC}[1]{\textbf{#1}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vectorD}[1]{\overrightarrow{#1}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vectorDt}[1]{\overrightarrow{\text{#1}}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vectE}[1]{\overset{\!\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{\mathbf {#1}}}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)
\( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{\!\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)
\(\newcommand{\avec}{\mathbf a}\) \(\newcommand{\bvec}{\mathbf b}\) \(\newcommand{\cvec}{\mathbf c}\) \(\newcommand{\dvec}{\mathbf d}\) \(\newcommand{\dtil}{\widetilde{\mathbf d}}\) \(\newcommand{\evec}{\mathbf e}\) \(\newcommand{\fvec}{\mathbf f}\) \(\newcommand{\nvec}{\mathbf n}\) \(\newcommand{\pvec}{\mathbf p}\) \(\newcommand{\qvec}{\mathbf q}\) \(\newcommand{\svec}{\mathbf s}\) \(\newcommand{\tvec}{\mathbf t}\) \(\newcommand{\uvec}{\mathbf u}\) \(\newcommand{\vvec}{\mathbf v}\) \(\newcommand{\wvec}{\mathbf w}\) \(\newcommand{\xvec}{\mathbf x}\) \(\newcommand{\yvec}{\mathbf y}\) \(\newcommand{\zvec}{\mathbf z}\) \(\newcommand{\rvec}{\mathbf r}\) \(\newcommand{\mvec}{\mathbf m}\) \(\newcommand{\zerovec}{\mathbf 0}\) \(\newcommand{\onevec}{\mathbf 1}\) \(\newcommand{\real}{\mathbb R}\) \(\newcommand{\twovec}[2]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\ctwovec}[2]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\threevec}[3]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cthreevec}[3]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\fourvec}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cfourvec}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\fivevec}[5]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \\ #5 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cfivevec}[5]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \\ #5 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\mattwo}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{rr}#1 \amp #2 \\ #3 \amp #4 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\laspan}[1]{\text{Span}\{#1\}}\) \(\newcommand{\bcal}{\cal B}\) \(\newcommand{\ccal}{\cal C}\) \(\newcommand{\scal}{\cal S}\) \(\newcommand{\wcal}{\cal W}\) \(\newcommand{\ecal}{\cal E}\) \(\newcommand{\coords}[2]{\left\{#1\right\}_{#2}}\) \(\newcommand{\gray}[1]{\color{gray}{#1}}\) \(\newcommand{\lgray}[1]{\color{lightgray}{#1}}\) \(\newcommand{\rank}{\operatorname{rank}}\) \(\newcommand{\row}{\text{Row}}\) \(\newcommand{\col}{\text{Col}}\) \(\renewcommand{\row}{\text{Row}}\) \(\newcommand{\nul}{\text{Nul}}\) \(\newcommand{\var}{\text{Var}}\) \(\newcommand{\corr}{\text{corr}}\) \(\newcommand{\len}[1]{\left#1\right}\) \(\newcommand{\bbar}{\overline{\bvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\bhat}{\widehat{\bvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\bperp}{\bvec^\perp}\) \(\newcommand{\xhat}{\widehat{\xvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\vhat}{\widehat{\vvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\uhat}{\widehat{\uvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\what}{\widehat{\wvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\Sighat}{\widehat{\Sigma}}\) \(\newcommand{\lt}{<}\) \(\newcommand{\gt}{>}\) \(\newcommand{\amp}{&}\) \(\definecolor{fillinmathshade}{gray}{0.9}\)Either the differential rate law or the integrated rate law can be used to determine the reaction order from experimental data. Often, the exponents in the rate law are the positive integers: 1 and 2 or even 0. Thus the reactions are zeroth, first, or second order in each reactant. The common patterns used to identify the reaction order are described in this section, where we focus on characteristic types of differential and integrated rate laws and how to determine the reaction order from experimental data. The learning objective of this Module is to know how to determine the reaction order from experimental data.
ZerothOrder Reactions
A zerothorder reaction is one whose rate is independent of concentration; its differential rate law is rate = k. We refer to these reactions as zeroth order because we could also write their rate in a form such that the exponent of the reactant in the rate law is 0:
\[\textrm{rate}=\dfrac{\Delta[\textrm A]}{\Delta t}=k[\textrm{reactant}]^0=k(1)=k \tag{14.15} \]
Because rate is independent of reactant concentration, a graph of the concentration of any reactant as a function of time is a straight line with a slope of −k. The value of k is negative because the concentration of the reactant decreases with time. Conversely, a graph of the concentration of any product as a function of time is a straight line with a slope of k, a positive value.
The graph of a zerothorder reaction. The change in concentration of reactant and product with time produces a straight line.
The integrated rate law for a zerothorder reaction also produces a straight line and has the general form
\[[A] = [A]_0 − kt \tag{14.16} \]
where [A]_{0} is the initial concentration of reactant A. (Equation 14.16 has the form of the algebraic equation for a straight line, y = mx + b, with y = [A], mx = −kt, and b = [A]_{0}.) In a zerothorder reaction, the rate constant must have the same units as the reaction rate, typically moles per liter per second.
Although it may seem counterintuitive for the reaction rate to be independent of the reactant concentration(s), such reactions are rather common. They occur most often when the reaction rate is determined by available surface area. An example is the decomposition of N_{2}O on a platinum (Pt) surface to produce N_{2} and O_{2}, which occurs at temperatures ranging from 200°C to 400°C:
\[\mathrm{2N_2O(g)}\xrightarrow{\textrm{Pt}}\mathrm{2N_2(g)}+\mathrm{O_2(g)} \tag{14.17} \]
Without a platinum surface, the reaction requires temperatures greater than 700°C, but between 200°C and 400°C, the only factor that determines how rapidly N_{2}O decomposes is the amount of Pt surface available (not the amount of Pt). As long as there is enough N_{2}O to react with the entire Pt surface, doubling or quadrupling the N_{2}O concentration will have no effect on the reaction rate. At very low concentrations of N_{2}O, where there are not enough molecules present to occupy the entire available Pt surface, the reaction rate is dependent on the N_{2}O concentration. The reaction rate is as follows:
\[\textrm{rate}=\dfrac{1}{2}\left (\dfrac{\Delta[\mathrm{N_2O}]}{\Delta t} \right )=\dfrac{1}{2}\left (\dfrac{\Delta[\mathrm{N_2}]}{\Delta t} \right )=\dfrac{\Delta[\mathrm{O_2}]}{\Delta t}=k[\mathrm{N_2O}]^0=k \tag{14.18} \]
Thus the rate at which N_{2}O is consumed and the rates at which N_{2} and O_{2} are produced are independent of concentration. As shown in Figure 14.8, the change in the concentrations of all species with time is linear. Most important, the exponent (0) corresponding to the N_{2}O concentration in the experimentally derived rate law is not the same as the reactant’s stoichiometric coefficient in the balanced chemical equation (2). For this reaction, as for all others, the rate law must be determined experimentally.
A zerothorder reaction that takes place in the human liver is the oxidation of ethanol (from alcoholic beverages) to acetaldehyde, catalyzed by the enzyme alcohol dehydrogenase. At high ethanol concentrations, this reaction is also a zerothorder reaction. The overall reaction equation is
where NAD^{+} (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide) and NADH (reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide) are the oxidized and reduced forms, respectively, of a species used by all organisms to transport electrons. When an alcoholic beverage is consumed, the ethanol is rapidly absorbed into the blood. Its concentration then decreases at a constant rate until it reaches zero (part (a) in Figure 14.10). An average 70 kg person typically takes about 2.5 h to oxidize the 15 mL of ethanol contained in a single 12 oz can of beer, a 5 oz glass of wine, or a shot of distilled spirits (such as whiskey or brandy). The actual rate, however, varies a great deal from person to person, depending on body size and the amount of alcohol dehydrogenase in the liver. The reaction rate does not increase if a greater quantity of alcohol is consumed over the same period of time because the reaction rate is determined only by the amount of enzyme present in the liver. Contrary to popular belief, the caffeine in coffee is ineffective at catalyzing the oxidation of ethanol. When the ethanol has been completely oxidized and its concentration drops to essentially zero, the rate of oxidation also drops rapidly (part (b) in Figure 14.10).
These examples illustrate two important points:
 In a zerothorder reaction, the reaction rate does not depend on the reactant concentration.
 A linear change in concentration with time is a clear indication of a zerothorder reaction.
FirstOrder Reactions
In a firstorder reaction, the reaction rate is directly proportional to the concentration of one of the reactants. Firstorder reactions often have the general form A → products. The differential rate for a firstorder reaction is as follows:
If the concentration of A is doubled, the reaction rate doubles; if the concentration of A is increased by a factor of 10, the reaction rate increases by a factor of 10, and so forth. Because the units of the reaction rate are always moles per liter per second, the units of a firstorder rate constant are reciprocal seconds (s^{−1}).
The integrated rate law for a firstorder reaction can be written in two different ways: one using exponents and one using logarithms. The exponential form is as follows:
\[[A] = [A]_0e^{−kt} \tag{14.20} \]
where [A]_{0} is the initial concentration of reactant A at t = 0; k is the rate constant; and e is the base of the natural logarithms, which has the value 2.718 to three decimal places. Recall that an integrated rate law gives the relationship between reactant concentration and time. Equation 14.20 predicts that the concentration of A will decrease in a smooth exponential curve over time. By taking the natural logarithm of each side of Equation 14.20 and rearranging, we obtain an alternative logarithmic expression of the relationship between the concentration of A and t:
\[\ln[A] = \ln[A]_0 − kt \tag{14.21} \]
Because Equation 14.21 has the form of the algebraic equation for a straight line, y = mx + b, with y = ln[A] and b = ln[A]_{0}, a plot of ln[A] versus t for a firstorder reaction should give a straight line with a slope of −k and an intercept of ln[A]_{0}. Either the differential rate law (Equation 14.19) or the integrated rate law (Equation 14.21) can be used to determine whether a particular reaction is first order.
Graphs of a firstorder reaction. The expected shapes of the curves for plots of reactant concentration versus time (top) and the natural logarithm of reactant concentration versus time (bottom) for a firstorder reaction.
Firstorder reactions are very common. In this chapter, we have already encountered two examples of firstorder reactions: the hydrolysis of aspirin (Figure 14.6) and the reaction of tbutyl bromide with water to give tbutanol (Equation 14.10). Another reaction that exhibits apparent firstorder kinetics is the hydrolysis of the anticancer drug cisplatin.
Cisplatin, the first “inorganic” anticancer drug to be discovered, is unique in its ability to cause complete remission of the relatively rare, but deadly cancers of the reproductive organs in young adults. The structures of cisplatin and its hydrolysis product are as follows:
Figure 14.11
Both platinum compounds have four groups arranged in a square plane around a Pt(II) ion. The reaction shown in Figure 14.11 is important because cisplatin, the form in which the drug is administered, is not the form in which the drug is active. Instead, at least one chloride ion must be replaced by water to produce a species that reacts with deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) to prevent cell division and tumor growth. Consequently, the kinetics of the reaction in Figure 14.11 have been studied extensively to find ways of maximizing the concentration of the active species.
Note 

If a plot of reactant concentration versus time is not linear but a plot of the natural logarithm of reactant concentration versus time is linear, then the reaction is first order. 
The rate law and reaction order of the hydrolysis of cisplatin are determined from experimental data, such as those displayed in Table 14.2. The table lists initial rate data for four experiments in which the reaction was run at pH 7.0 and 25°C but with different initial concentrations of cisplatin. Because the reaction rate increases with increasing cisplatin concentration, we know this cannot be a zerothorder reaction. Comparing Experiments 1 and 2 in Table 14.2 shows that the reaction rate doubles [(1.8 × 10^{−5} M/min) ÷ (9.0 × 10^{−6} M/min) = 2.0] when the concentration of cisplatin is doubled (from 0.0060 M to 0.012 M). Similarly, comparing Experiments 1 and 4 shows that the reaction rate increases by a factor of 5 [(4.5 × 10^{−5} M/min) ÷ (9.0 × 10^{−6} M/min) = 5.0] when the concentration of cisplatin is increased by a factor of 5 (from 0.0060 M to 0.030 M). Because the reaction rate is directly proportional to the concentration of the reactant, the exponent of the cisplatin concentration in the rate law must be 1, so the rate law is rate = k[cisplatin]^{1}. Thus the reaction is first order. Knowing this, we can calculate the rate constant using the differential rate law for a firstorder reaction and the data in any row of Table 14.2. For example, substituting the values for Experiment 3 into Equation 14.19,
3.6 × 10^{−5} M/min = k(0.024 M)
1.5 × 10^{−3} min^{−1} = k
Table 14.2 Rates of Hydrolysis of Cisplatin as a Function of Concentration at pH 7.0 and 25°C
Experiment  [Cisplatin]_{0} (M)  Initial Rate (M/min) 

1  0.0060  9.0 × 10^{−6} 
2  0.012  1.8 × 10^{−5} 
3  0.024  3.6 × 10^{−5} 
4  0.030  4.5 × 10^{−5} 
Knowing the rate constant for the hydrolysis of cisplatin and the rate constants for subsequent reactions that produce species that are highly toxic enables hospital pharmacists to provide patients with solutions that contain only the desired form of the drug.
Example 4 


At high temperatures, ethyl chloride produces HCl and ethylene by the following reaction: \[\mathrm{CH_3CH_2Cl(g)}\xrightarrow{\Delta}\mathrm{HCl(g)}+\mathrm{C_2H_4(g)} \nonumber \]
Using the rate data for the reaction at 650°C presented in the following table, calculate the reaction order with respect to the concentration of ethyl chloride and determine the rate constant for the reaction.
Given: balanced chemical equation, initial concentrations of reactant, and initial rates of reaction Asked for: reaction order and rate constant Strategy:
C Use measured concentrations and rate data from any of the experiments to find the rate constant. SolutionThe reaction order with respect to ethyl chloride is determined by examining the effect of changes in the ethyl chloride concentration on the reaction rate. A Comparing Experiments 2 and 3 shows that doubling the concentration doubles the reaction rate, so the reaction rate is proportional to [CH_{3}CH_{2}Cl]. Similarly, comparing Experiments 1 and 4 shows that quadrupling the concentration quadruples the reaction rate, again indicating that the reaction rate is directly proportional to [CH_{3}CH_{2}Cl]. B This behavior is characteristic of a firstorder reaction, for which the rate law is rate = k[CH_{3}CH_{2}Cl]. C We can calculate the rate constant (k) using any row in the table. Selecting Experiment 1 gives the following: 1.60 × 10^{−8} M/s = k(0.010 M) 1.6 × 10^{−6} s^{−1} = k ExerciseSulfuryl chloride (SO_{2}Cl_{2}) decomposes to SO_{2} and Cl_{2} by the following reaction: SO_{2}Cl_{2}(g) → SO_{2}(g) + Cl_{2}(g) Data for the reaction at 320°C are listed in the following table. Calculate the reaction order with regard to sulfuryl chloride and determine the rate constant for the reaction. 
Exercise 1: I see you  

Sulfuryl chloride (SO_{2}Cl_{2}) decomposes to SO_{2} and Cl_{2} by the following reaction: SO_{2}Cl_{2}(g) → SO_{2}(g) + Cl_{2}(g) Data for the reaction at 320°C are listed in the following table. Calculate the reaction order with regard to sulfuryl chloride and determine the rate constant for the reaction.
Answer first order; k = 2.2 × 10^{−5} s^{−1} 
We can also use the integrated rate law to determine the reaction rate for the hydrolysis of cisplatin. To do this, we examine the change in the concentration of the reactant or the product as a function of time at a single initial cisplatin concentration. Part (a) in Figure 14.12 shows plots for a solution that originally contained 0.0100 M cisplatin and was maintained at pH 7 and 25°C. The concentration of cisplatin decreases smoothly with time, and the concentration of chloride ion increases in a similar way. When we plot the natural logarithm of the concentration of cisplatin versus time, we obtain the plot shown in part (b) in Figure 14.12. The straight line is consistent with the behavior of a system that obeys a firstorder rate law. We can use any two points on the line to calculate the slope of the line, which gives us the rate constant for the reaction. Thus taking the points from part (a) in Figure 14.12 for t = 100 min ([cisplatin] = 0.0086 M) and t = 1000 min ([cisplatin] = 0.0022 M),
\\k&=\dfrac{\ln 0.0022\ln 0.0086}{\mathrm{1000\;min100\;min}}=\dfrac{6.12(4.76)}{\mathrm{900\;min}}=1.51\times10^{3}\;\mathrm{min^{1}}
\\k&=1.5\times10^{3}\;\mathrm{min^{1}}\end{align}\)
The slope is negative because we are calculating the rate of disappearance of cisplatin. Also, the rate constant has units of min^{−1} because the times plotted on the horizontal axes in parts (a) and (b) in Figure 14.12 are in minutes rather than seconds.
The reaction order and the magnitude of the rate constant we obtain using the integrated rate law are exactly the same as those we calculated earlier using the differential rate law. This must be true if the experiments were carried out under the same conditions.
Example 5 

Refer back to Example 4. If a sample of ethyl chloride with an initial concentration of 0.0200 M is heated at 650°C, what is the concentration of ethyl chloride after 10 h? How many hours at 650°C must elapse for the concentration to decrease to 0.0050 M? (Recall that we calculated the rate constant for this reaction in Example 4.) Given: initial concentration, rate constant, and time interval Asked for: concentration at specified time and time required to obtain particular concentration Strategy:
SolutionThe exponential form of the integrated rate law for a firstorder reaction (Equation 14.20) is [A] = [A]_{0}e^{−kt}. A Having been given the initial concentration of ethyl chloride ([A]_{0}) and having calculated the rate constant in Example 4 (k = 1.6 × 10^{−6} s^{−1}), we can use the rate law to calculate the concentration of the reactant at a given time t. Substituting the known values into the integrated rate law, \(\begin{align}[\mathrm{CH_3CH_2Cl}]_{\mathrm{10\;h}}&=[\mathrm{CH_3CH_2Cl}]_0e^{kt}
\\&=\textrm{0.0200 M}(e^{\large{(1.6\times10^{6}\textrm{ s}^{1})[(10\textrm{ h})(60\textrm{ min/h})(60\textrm{ s/min})]}}) \\&=0.0189\textrm{ M}\end{align}\) We could also have used the logarithmic form of the integrated rate law (Equation 14.21): \(\begin{align}\ln[\mathrm{CH_3CH_2Cl}]_{\textrm{10 h}}&=\ln [\mathrm{CH_3CH_2Cl}]_0kt
\\ &=\ln 0.0200(1.6\times10^{6}\textrm{ s}^{1})[(\textrm{10 h})(\textrm{60 min/h})(\textrm{60 s/min})] \\ &=3.9120.0576=3.970 \\ [\mathrm{CH_3CH_2Cl}]_{\textrm{10 h}}&=e^{3.970}\textrm{ M} \\ &=0.0189\textrm{ M}\end{align}\) B To calculate the amount of time required to reach a given concentration, we must solve the integrated rate law for t. Equation 14.21 gives the following: \(\begin{align}\ln[\mathrm{CH_3CH_2Cl}]_t &=\ln[\mathrm{CH_3CH_2Cl}]_0kt
\\kt &=\ln[\mathrm{CH_3CH_2Cl}]_0\ln[\mathrm{CH_3CH_2Cl}]_t=\ln\dfrac{[\mathrm{CH_3CH_2Cl}]_0}{[\mathrm{CH_3CH_2Cl}]_t} \\ t &=\dfrac{1}{k}\left (\ln\dfrac{[\mathrm{CH_3CH_2Cl}]_0}{[\mathrm{CH_3CH_2Cl}]_t} \right )=\dfrac{1}{1.6\times10^{6}\textrm{ s}^{1}}\left(\ln \dfrac{0.0200\textrm{ M}}{0.0050\textrm{ M}}\right) \\ &=\dfrac{\ln 4.0}{1.6\times10^{6}\textrm{ s}^{1}}=8.7\times10^5\textrm{ s}=240\textrm{ h}=2.4\times10^2\textrm{ h}\end{align}\) 
Exercise 5 

In the exercise in Example 4, you found that the decomposition of sulfuryl chloride (SO_{2}Cl_{2}) is first order, and you calculated the rate constant at 320°C. Use the form(s) of the integrated rate law to find the amount of SO_{2}Cl_{2} that remains after 20 h if a sample with an original concentration of 0.123 M is heated at 320°C. How long would it take for 90% of the SO_{2}Cl_{2} to decompose? Answer 0.0252 M; 29 h 
SecondOrder Reactions
The simplest kind of secondorder reaction is one whose rate is proportional to the square of the concentration of one reactant. These generally have the form 2A → products. A second kind of secondorder reaction has a reaction rate that is proportional to the product of the concentrations of two reactants. Such reactions generally have the form A + B → products. An example of the former is a dimerization reaction, in which two smaller molecules, each called a monomer, combine to form a larger molecule (a dimer).
The differential rate law for the simplest secondorder reaction in which 2A → products is as follows:
\[\textrm{rate}=\dfrac{\Delta[\textrm A]}{2\Delta t}=k[\textrm A]^2 \tag{14.22} \]
Consequently, doubling the concentration of A quadruples the reaction rate. For the units of the reaction rate to be moles per liter per second (M/s), the units of a secondorder rate constant must be the inverse (M^{−1}·s^{−1}). Because the units of molarity are expressed as mol/L, the unit of the rate constant can also be written as L(mol·s).
For the reaction 2A → products, the following integrated rate law describes the concentration of the reactant at a given time:
\[\dfrac{1}{[\textrm A]}=\dfrac{1}{[\textrm A]_0}+kt \tag{14.23} \]
Because Equation 14.23 has the form of an algebraic equation for a straight line, y = mx + b, with y = 1/[A] and b = 1/[A]_{0}, a plot of 1/[A] versus t for a simple secondorder reaction is a straight line with a slope of k and an intercept of 1/[A]_{0}.
Note 

Secondorder reactions generally have the form 2A → products or A + B → products. 
Simple secondorder reactions are common. In addition to dimerization reactions, two other examples are the decomposition of NO_{2} to NO and O_{2} and the decomposition of HI to I_{2} and H_{2}. Most examples involve simple inorganic molecules, but there are organic examples as well. We can follow the progress of the reaction described in the following paragraph by monitoring the decrease in the intensity of the red color of the reaction mixture.
Many cyclic organic compounds that contain two carbon–carbon double bonds undergo a dimerization reaction to give complex structures. One example is as follows:
Figure 14.13
For simplicity, we will refer to this reactant and product as “monomer” and “dimer,” respectively. The systematic name of the monomer is 2,5dimethyl3,4diphenylcyclopentadienone. The systematic name of the dimer is the name of the monomer followed by “dimer.” Because the monomers are the same, the general equation for this reaction is 2A → product. This reaction represents an important class of organic reactions used in the pharmaceutical industry to prepare complex carbon skeletons for the synthesis of drugs. Like the firstorder reactions studied previously, it can be analyzed using either the differential rate law (Equation 14.22) or the integrated rate law (Equation 14.23).
To determine the differential rate law for the reaction, we need data on how the reaction rate varies as a function of monomer concentrations, which are provided in Table 14.3. From the data, we see that the reaction rate is not independent of the monomer concentration, so this is not a zerothorder reaction. We also see that the reaction rate is not proportional to the monomer concentration, so the reaction is not first order. Comparing the data in the second and fourth rows shows that the reaction rate decreases by a factor of 2.8 when the monomer concentration decreases by a factor of 1.7:
Table 14.3 Rates of Reaction as a Function of Monomer Concentration for an Initial Monomer Concentration of 0.0054 M
Time (min)  [Monomer] (M)  Instantaneous Rate (M/min) 

10  0.0044  8.0 × 10^{−5} 
26  0.0034  5.0 × 10^{−5} 
44  0.0027  3.1 × 10^{−5} 
70  0.0020  1.8 × 10^{−5} 
120  0.0014  8.0 × 10^{−6} 
Because (1.7)^{2} = 2.9 ≈ 2.8, the reaction rate is approximately proportional to the square of the monomer concentration.
rate ∝ [monomer]^{2}
This means that the reaction is second order in the monomer. Using Equation 14.22 and the data from any row in Table 14.3, we can calculate the rate constant. Substituting values at time 10 min, for example, gives the following:
\\8.0\times10^{5}\textrm{ M/min}&=k(4.4\times10^{3}\textrm{ M})^2
\\4.1 \textrm{ M}^{1}\cdot \textrm{min}^{1}&=k\end{align}\)
We can also determine the reaction order using the integrated rate law. To do so, we use the decrease in the concentration of the monomer as a function of time for a single reaction, plotted in part (a) in Figure 14.14. The measurements show that the concentration of the monomer (initially 5.4 × 10^{−3} M) decreases with increasing time. This graph also shows that the reaction rate decreases smoothly with increasing time. According to the integrated rate law for a secondorder reaction, a plot of 1/[monomer] versus t should be a straight line, as shown in part (b) in Figure 14.14. Any pair of points on the line can be used to calculate the slope, which is the secondorder rate constant. In this example, k = 4.1 M^{−1}·min^{−1}, which is consistent with the result obtained using the differential rate equation. Although in this example the stoichiometric coefficient is the same as the reaction order, this is not always the case. The reaction order must always be determined experimentally.
Figure 14.14 Dimerization of a Monomeric Compound, a SecondOrder Reaction. These plots correspond to dimerization of the monomer in Figure 14.13 as (a) the experimentally determined concentration of monomer versus time and (b) 1/[monomer] versus time. The straight line in (b) is expected for a simple secondorder reaction.
For two or more reactions of the same order, the reaction with the largest rate constant is the fastest. Because the units of the rate constants for zeroth, first, and secondorder reactions are different, however, we cannot compare the magnitudes of rate constants for reactions that have different orders. The differential and integrated rate laws for zeroth, first, and secondorder reactions and their corresponding graphs are shown in Figure 14.16.
Example 6 


At high temperatures, nitrogen dioxide decomposes to nitric oxide and oxygen. \[\mathrm{2NO_2(g)}\xrightarrow{\Delta}\mathrm{2NO(g)}+\mathrm{O_2(g)} \nonumber \]
Experimental data for the reaction at 300°C and four initial concentrations of NO_{2} are listed in the following table:

Determine the reaction order and the rate constant.
Given: balanced chemical equation, initial concentrations, and initial rates
Asked for: reaction order and rate constant
Strategy:
 From the experiments, compare the changes in the initial reaction rates with the corresponding changes in the initial concentrations. Determine whether the changes are characteristic of zeroth, first, or secondorder reactions.
 Determine the appropriate rate law. Using this rate law and data from any experiment, solve for the rate constant (k).
Solution
A We can determine the reaction order with respect to nitrogen dioxide by comparing the changes in NO_{2} concentrations with the corresponding reaction rates. Comparing Experiments 2 and 4, for example, shows that doubling the concentration quadruples the reaction rate [(5.40 × 10^{−5}) ÷ (1.35 × 10^{−5}) = 4.0], which means that the reaction rate is proportional to [NO_{2}]^{2}. Similarly, comparing Experiments 1 and 4 shows that tripling the concentration increases the reaction rate by a factor of 9, again indicating that the reaction rate is proportional to [NO_{2}]^{2}. This behavior is characteristic of a secondorder reaction.
B We have rate = k[NO_{2}]^{2}. We can calculate the rate constant (k) using data from any experiment in the table. Selecting Experiment 2, for example, gives the following:
\\5.40\times10^{5}\textrm{ M/s}&=k(\mathrm{\mathrm{0.010\;M}})^2
\\0.54\mathrm{\;M^{1}\cdot s^{1}}&=k\end{align}\)
Exercise
When the highly reactive species HO_{2} forms in the atmosphere, one important reaction that then removes it from the atmosphere is as follows:
\[2HO_{2(g)} \rightarrow H_2O_{2(g)} + O_{2(g)} \nonumber \]
The kinetics of this reaction have been studied in the laboratory, and some initial rate data at 25°C are listed in the following table:
Exercise  

When the highly reactive species HO_{2} forms in the atmosphere, one important reaction that then removes it from the atmosphere is as follows: \[2HO_{2(g)} \rightarrow H_2O_{2(g)} + O_{2(g)} \nonumber \] The kinetics of this reaction have been studied in the laboratory, and some initial rate data at 25°C are listed in the following table:
as Determine the reaction order and the rate constant. Answer second order in HO_{2}; k = 1.4 × 10^{9} M^{−1}·s^{−1} 
Note 

If a plot of reactant concentration versus time is not linear but a plot of 1/reaction concentration versus time is linear, then the reaction is second order. 
Example 7 

If a flask that initially contains 0.056 M NO_{2} is heated at 300°C, what will be the concentration of NO_{2} after 1.0 h? How long will it take for the concentration of NO_{2} to decrease to 10% of the initial concentration? Use the integrated rate law for a secondorder reaction (Equation 14.23) and the rate constant calculated in Example 6. Given: balanced chemical equation, rate constant, time interval, and initial concentration Asked for: final concentration and time required to reach specified concentration Strategy:
SolutionA We know k and [NO_{2}]_{0}, and we are asked to determine [NO_{2}] at t = 1 h (3600 s). Substituting the appropriate values into Equation 14.23, \(\begin{align}\dfrac{1}{[\mathrm{NO_2}]_{3600}}&=\dfrac{1}{[\mathrm{NO_2}]_0}+kt=\dfrac{1}{0.056\textrm{ M}}+[(0.54 \mathrm{\;M^{1}\cdot s^{1}})(3600\textrm{ s})]
\\&=2.0\times10^3\textrm{ M}^{1}\end{align}\) Thus [NO_{2}]_{3600} = 5.1 × 10^{−4} M. B In this case, we know k and [NO_{2}]_{0}, and we are asked to calculate at what time [NO_{2}] = 0.1[NO_{2}]_{0} = 0.1(0.056 M) = 0.0056 M. To do this, we solve Equation 14.23 for t, using the concentrations given. \(t=\dfrac{(1/[\mathrm{NO_2}])(1/[\mathrm{NO_2}]_0)}{k}=\dfrac{(1/0.0056 \textrm{ M})(1/0.056\textrm{ M})}{0.54 \;\mathrm{M^{1}\cdot s^{1}}}=3.0\times10^2\textrm{ s}=5.0\textrm{ min}\)
NO_{2} decomposes very rapidly; under these conditions, the reaction is 90% complete in only 5.0 min. 
Exercise 7 

In the exercise in Example 6, you calculated the rate constant for the decomposition of HO_{2} as k = 1.4 × 10^{9} M^{−1}·s^{−1}. This high rate constant means that HO_{2} decomposes rapidly under the reaction conditions given in the problem. In fact, the HO_{2} molecule is so reactive that it is virtually impossible to obtain in high concentrations. Given a 0.0010 M sample of HO_{2}, calculate the concentration of HO_{2} that remains after 1.0 h at 25°C. How long will it take for 90% of the HO_{2} to decompose? Use the integrated rate law for a secondorder reaction (Equation 14.23) and the rate constant calculated in the exercise in Example 6. Answer 2.0 × 10^{−13} M; 6.4 × 10^{−6} s 
In addition to the simple secondorder reaction and rate law we have just described, another very common secondorder reaction has the general form \(A + B \rightarrow products\), in which the reaction is first order in \(A\) and first order in \(B\). The differential rate law for this reaction is as follows:
\[\textrm{rate}=\dfrac{\Delta[\textrm A]}{\Delta t}=\dfrac{\Delta[\textrm B]}{\Delta t}=k[\textrm A][\textrm B] \tag{14.24} \]
Because the reaction is first order both in A and in B, it has an overall reaction order of 2. (The integrated rate law for this reaction is rather complex, so we will not describe it.) We can recognize secondorder reactions of this sort because the reaction rate is proportional to the concentrations of each reactant.
Determining the Rate Law of a Reaction
The number of fundamentally different mechanisms (sets of steps in a reaction) is actually rather small compared to the large number of chemical reactions that can occur. Thus understanding reaction mechanisms can simplify what might seem to be a confusing variety of chemical reactions. The first step in discovering the reaction mechanism is to determine the reaction’s rate law. This can be done by designing experiments that measure the concentration(s) of one or more reactants or products as a function of time. For the reaction \(A + B \rightarrow products\), for example, we need to determine k and the exponents m and n in the following equation:
\[\text{rate} = k[A]^m[B]^n \tag{14.25} \]
To do this, we might keep the initial concentration of B constant while varying the initial concentration of A and calculating the initial reaction rate. This information would permit us to deduce the reaction order with respect to A. Similarly, we could determine the reaction order with respect to B by studying the initial reaction rate when the initial concentration of A is kept constant while the initial concentration of B is varied. In earlier examples, we determined the reaction order with respect to a given reactant by comparing the different rates obtained when only the concentration of the reactant in question was changed. An alternative way of determining reaction orders is to set up a proportion using the rate laws for two different experiments. Rate data for a hypothetical reaction of the type \(A + B \rightarrow products\) are given in Table 14.4.
Table 14.4 Rate Data for a Hypothetical Reaction of the Form \(A + B \rightarrow products\)
Experiment  [A] (M)  [B] (M)  Initial Rate (M/min) 

1  0.50  0.50  8.5 × 10^{−3} 
2  0.75  0.50  19 × 10^{−3} 
3  1.00  0.50  34 × 10^{−3} 
4  0.50  0.75  8.5 × 10^{−3} 
5  0.50  1.00  8.5 × 10^{−3} 
The general rate law for the reaction is given in Equation 14.25. We can obtain m or n directly by using a proportion of the rate laws for two experiments in which the concentration of one reactant is the same, such as Experiments 1 and 3 in Table 14.4.
\[\dfrac{\mathrm{rate_1}}{\mathrm{rate_3}}=\dfrac{k[\textrm A_1]^m[\textrm B_1]^n}{k[\textrm A_3]^m[\textrm B_3]^n} \nonumber \]
Inserting the appropriate values from Table 14.4,
Because 1.00 to any power is 1, [1.00 M]^{m} = 1.00 M. We can cancel like terms to give 0.25 = [0.50]^{m}, which can also be written as 1/4 = [1/2]^{m}. Thus we can conclude that m = 2 and that the reaction is second order in A. By selecting two experiments in which the concentration of B is the same, we were able to solve for m.
Conversely, by selecting two experiments in which the concentration of A is the same (e.g., Experiments 5 and 1), we can solve for n.
\(\dfrac{\mathrm{rate_1}}{\mathrm{rate_5}}=\dfrac{k[\mathrm{A_1}]^m[\mathrm{B_1}]^n}{k[\mathrm{A_5}]^m[\mathrm{B_5}]^n}\)
Substituting the appropriate values from Table 14.4,
Canceling leaves 1.0 = [0.50]^{n}, which gives \(n = 0\); that is, the reaction is zeroth order in \(B\). The experimentally determined rate law is therefore
rate = k[A]^{2}[B]^{0} = k[A]^{2}
We can now calculate the rate constant by inserting the data from any row of Table 14.4 into the experimentally determined rate law and solving for \(k\). Using Experiment 2, we obtain
19 × 10^{−3} M/min = k(0.75 M)^{2}
3.4 × 10^{−2} M^{−1}·min^{−1} = k
You should verify that using data from any other row of Table 14.4 gives the same rate constant. This must be true as long as the experimental conditions, such as temperature and solvent, are the same.
Example 8 


Nitric oxide is produced in the body by several different enzymes and acts as a signal that controls blood pressure, longterm memory, and other critical functions. The major route for removing NO from biological fluids is via reaction with \(O_2\) to give \(NO_2\), which then reacts rapidly with water to give nitrous acid and nitric acid: These reactions are important in maintaining steady levels of NO. The following table lists kinetics data for the reaction of NO with O_{2} at 25°C: \[2NO(g) + O_2(g) \rightarrow 2NO_2(g) \nonumber \] Determine the rate law for the reaction and calculate the rate constant.
Given: balanced chemical equation, initial concentrations, and initial rates Asked for: rate law and rate constant Strategy:
SolutionA Comparing Experiments 1 and 2 shows that as [O_{2}] is doubled at a constant value of [NO_{2}], the reaction rate approximately doubles. Thus the reaction rate is proportional to [O_{2}]^{1}, so the reaction is first order in O_{2}. Comparing Experiments 1 and 3 shows that the reaction rate essentially quadruples when [NO] is doubled and [O_{2}] is held constant. That is, the reaction rate is proportional to [NO]^{2}, which indicates that the reaction is second order in NO. Using these relationships, we can write the rate law for the reaction: rate = k[NO]^{2}[O_{2}] B The data in any row can be used to calculate the rate constant. Using Experiment 1, for example, gives \[k=\dfrac{\textrm{rate}}{[\mathrm{NO}]^2[\mathrm{O_2}]}=\dfrac{7.98\times10^{3}\textrm{ M/s}}{(0.0235\textrm{ M})^2(0.0125\textrm{ M})}=1.16\times10^3\;\mathrm{ M^{2}\cdot s^{1}} \nonumber \]
Alternatively, using Experiment 2 gives \[k=\dfrac{\textrm{rate}}{[\mathrm{NO}]^2[\mathrm{O_2}]}=\dfrac{15.9\times10^{3}\textrm{ M/s}}{(0.0235\textrm{ M})^2(0.0250\textrm{ M})}=1.15\times10^3\;\mathrm{ M^{2}\cdot s^{1}} \nonumber \]
The difference is minor and associated with significant digits and likely experimental error in making the table. The overall reaction order \((m + n) = 3\), so this is a thirdorder reaction whose rate is determined by three reactants. The units of the rate constant become more complex as the overall reaction order increases. 
Exercise 8  

The peroxydisulfate ion (S_{2}O_{8}^{2−}) is a potent oxidizing agent that reacts rapidly with iodide ion in water: S_{2}O_{8}^{2−}(aq) + 3I^{−}(aq) → 2SO_{4}^{2−}(aq) + I_{3}^{−}(aq) The following table lists kinetics data for this reaction at 25°C. Determine the rate law and calculate the rate constant.
Answer rate = k[S_{2}O_{8}^{2−}][I^{−}]; k = 20 M^{−1}·s^{−1} 
Summary
The reaction rate of a zerothorder reaction is independent of the concentration of the reactants. The reaction rate of a firstorder reaction is directly proportional to the concentration of one reactant. The reaction rate of a simple secondorder reaction is proportional to the square of the concentration of one reactant. Knowing the rate law of a reaction gives clues to the reaction mechanism.
Note the Pattern If a plot of reactant concentration versus time is linear, then the reaction is zeroth order in that reactant. 
Key Equations
zerothorder reaction
Equation 14.15: \(\textrm{rate}=\frac{\Delta[\textrm A]}{\Delta t}=k\)
Equation 14.16: [A] = [A]_{0} − kt
firstorder reaction
Equation 14.19: \(\textrm{rate}=\frac{\Delta[\textrm A]}{\Delta t}=k[\textrm A]\)
Equation 14.20: [A] = [A]_{0}e^{−kt}
Equation 14.21: ln[A] = ln[A]_{0} − kt
secondorder reaction
Equation 14.22: \(\textrm{rate}=\frac{\Delta[\textrm A]}{\Delta t}=k[\textrm A]^2\)
Equation 14.23: \(\frac{1}{[\textrm A]}=\frac{1}{[\textrm A]_0}+kt\)
Conceptual Problems
 What are the characteristics of a zerothorder reaction? Experimentally, how would you determine whether a reaction is zeroth order?
 Predict whether the following reactions are zeroth order and explain your reasoning.
 a substitution reaction of an alcohol with HCl to form an alkyl halide and water
 catalytic hydrogenation of an alkene
 hydrolysis of an alkyl halide to an alcohol
 enzymatic conversion of nitrate to nitrite in a soil bacterium
 In a firstorder reaction, what is the advantage of using the integrated rate law expressed in natural logarithms over the rate law expressed in exponential form?
 If the reaction rate is directly proportional to the concentration of a reactant, what does this tell you about (a) the reaction order with respect to the reactant and (b) the overall reaction order?
 The reaction of NO with O_{2} is found to be second order with respect to NO and first order with respect to O_{2}. What is the overall reaction order? What is the effect of doubling the concentration of each reagent on the reaction rate?
Numerical Problems
 Iodide reduces Fe(III) according to the following reaction:
2Fe^{3}^{+}(soln) + 2I^{−}(soln) → 2Fe^{2}^{+}(soln) + I_{2}(soln)
Experimentally, it was found that doubling the concentration of Fe(III) doubled the reaction rate, and doubling the iodide concentration increased the reaction rate by a factor of 4. What is the reaction order with respect to each species? What is the overall rate law? What is the overall reaction order?
 Benzoyl peroxide is a medication used to treat acne. Its rate of thermal decomposition at several concentrations was determined experimentally, and the data were tabulated as follows:
Experiment  [Benzoyl Peroxide]_{0} (M)  Initial Rate (M/s) 
1  1.00  2.22 × 10^{−4} 
2  0.70  1.64 × 10^{−4} 
3  0.50  1.12 × 10^{−4} 
4  0.25  0.59 × 10^{−4} 
What is the reaction order with respect to benzoyl peroxide? What is the rate law for this reaction?
 1Bromopropane is a colorless liquid that reacts with S_{2}O_{3}^{2−} according to the following reaction:
C_{3}H_{7}Br + S_{2}O_{3}^{2−} → C_{3}H_{7}S_{2}O_{3}^{−} + Br^{−}
The reaction is first order in 1bromopropane and first order in S_{2}O_{3}^{2−}, with a rate constant of 8.05 × 10^{−4} M^{−1}·s^{−1}. If you began a reaction with 40 mmol/100 mL of C_{3}H_{7}Br and an equivalent concentration of S_{2}O_{3}^{2−}, what would the initial reaction rate be? If you were to decrease the concentration of each reactant to 20 mmol/100 mL, what would the initial reaction rate be?
 The experimental rate law for the reaction 3A + 2B → C + D was found to be Δ[C]/Δt = k[A]^{2}[B] for an overall reaction that is third order. Because graphical analysis is difficult beyond secondorder reactions, explain the procedure for determining the rate law experimentally.
Numerical Answers
 First order in Fe^{3}^{+}; second order in I^{−}; third order overall; rate = k[Fe^{3}^{+}][I^{−}]^{2}.
 1.29 × 10^{−4} M/s; 3.22 × 10^{−5} M/s