Skip to main content
Chemistry LibreTexts

10.5: Stability of the Allyl Radical - Resonance Revisited

  • Page ID
    448639
  • \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    ( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)

    \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)

    \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorA}[1]{\vec{#1}}      % arrow\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorAt}[1]{\vec{\text{#1}}}      % arrow\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorB}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorC}[1]{\textbf{#1}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorD}[1]{\overrightarrow{#1}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorDt}[1]{\overrightarrow{\text{#1}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectE}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{\mathbf {#1}}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)

    To see why an allylic radical is so stable, look at the orbital picture in Figure 10.4. The radical carbon atom with an unpaired electron can adopt sp2 hybridization, placing the unpaired electron in a p orbital and giving a structure that is electronically symmetrical. The p orbital on the central carbon can therefore overlap equally well with a p orbital on either of the two neighboring carbons.

    The orbital picture of three s p 2 orbitals, a ball and stick model, and two resonance structures of an allyl radical.
    Figure 10.4: An orbital view of the allyl radical. The p orbital on the central carbon can overlap equally well with a p orbital on either neighboring carbon, giving rise to two equivalent resonance structures.

    Because the allyl radical is electronically symmetrical, it has two resonance forms—one with the unpaired electron on the left and the double bond on the right and another with the unpaired electron on the right and the double bond on the left. Neither structure is correct by itself; the true structure of the allyl radical is a resonance hybrid of the two. (You might want to review Section 2.4 to Section 2.6 to brush up on resonance.) As noted in Section 2.5, the greater the number of resonance forms, the greater the stability of a compound, because bonding electrons are attracted to more nuclei. An allyl radical, with two resonance forms, is therefore more stable than a typical alkyl radical, which has only a single structure.

    In molecular orbital terms, the stability of the allyl radical is due to the fact that the unpaired electron is delocalized, or spread out, over an extended π-orbital network rather than localized at only one site, as shown by the computer-generated MO in Figure 10.4. This delocalization is particularly apparent in the so-called spin-density surface in Figure 10.5, which shows the calculated location of the unpaired electron. The two terminal carbons share the unpaired electron equally.

    The allyl radical's electrostatic potential map with a ball and stick model. Arrows point towards C1 and C3.
    Figure 10.5: The spin density surface of the allyl radical locates the position of the unpaired electron
    and shows that it is equally shared between the two terminal carbons.

    In addition to its effect on stability, delocalization of the unpaired electron in the allyl radical has other chemical consequences. Because the unpaired electron is delocalized over both ends of the π orbital system, reaction with Br2 can occur at either end. As a result, allylic bromination of an unsymmetrical alkene often leads to a mixture of products. For example, bromination of 1-octene gives a mixture of 3-bromo-1-octene and 1-bromo-2-octene. The two products are not formed in equal amounts, however, because the intermediate allylic radical is not symmetrical and reaction at the two ends is not equally likely. Reaction at the less hindered, primary end is favored.

    The reaction of 1-octene with N-bromosuccinimide, light, and carbon tetrachloride forms two resonance structures that further form 3-bromo-1-octene (17%) and 1-bromo-2-octene (83%). 1-bromo-2-octene is in ratio 53:47 trans:cis.

    The products of allylic bromination reactions are useful for conversion into dienes by dehydrohalogenation with base. Cyclohexene can be converted into 1,3-cyclohexadiene, for example.

    The reaction of cyclohexene with N-bromosuccinimide, light, and carbon tetrachloride forms 3-bromocyclohexene that reacts with KOH to form 1,3-cyclohexadiene.

    Worked Example 10.1

    Predicting the Product of an Allylic Bromination Reaction

    What products would you expect from the reaction of 4,4-dimethylcyclohexene with NBS?

    Strategy

    Draw the alkene reactant, and identify the allylic positions. In this case, there are two different allylic positions; we’ll label them A and B. Now abstract an allylic hydrogen from each position to generate the two corresponding allylic radicals. Each of the two allylic radicals can add a Br atom at either end (A or A′; B or B′), to give a mixture of up to four products. Draw and name the products. In the present instance, the “two” products from reaction at position B are identical, so only three products are formed in this reaction.

    Solution

    4,4-dimethylcyclohexene reacts with N B S to form several products. Abstraction of hydrogen from C3 forms 3-bromo-4,4-dimethylcyclohexene and 6-bromo-3,3-dimethylcyclohexene, while abstraction of hydrogen from C6 forms 3-bromo-5,5-dimethylcyclohexene.

    Draw three resonance forms for the cyclohexadienyl radical.

     the=

    The major product of the reaction of methylenecyclohexane with N-bromosuccinimide is 1-(bromomethyl)cyclohexene. Explain.

     the=
    Problem 10-7 What products would you expect from reaction of the following alkenes with NBS? If more than one product is formed, show the structures of all.
    (a)

    The structure of 5-methylcyclooct-1-ene. (b)

    The structure of 2-methylhex-3-ene.


    This page titled 10.5: Stability of the Allyl Radical - Resonance Revisited is shared under a CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by OpenStax via source content that was edited to the style and standards of the LibreTexts platform; a detailed edit history is available upon request.