Skip to main content
Chemistry LibreTexts

6.2: Arrhenius Concept

  • Page ID
    151388
  • \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    ( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)

    \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)

    \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorA}[1]{\vec{#1}}      % arrow\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorAt}[1]{\vec{\text{#1}}}      % arrow\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorB}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorC}[1]{\textbf{#1}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorD}[1]{\overrightarrow{#1}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorDt}[1]{\overrightarrow{\text{#1}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectE}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{\mathbf {#1}}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)

    \(\newcommand{\avec}{\mathbf a}\) \(\newcommand{\bvec}{\mathbf b}\) \(\newcommand{\cvec}{\mathbf c}\) \(\newcommand{\dvec}{\mathbf d}\) \(\newcommand{\dtil}{\widetilde{\mathbf d}}\) \(\newcommand{\evec}{\mathbf e}\) \(\newcommand{\fvec}{\mathbf f}\) \(\newcommand{\nvec}{\mathbf n}\) \(\newcommand{\pvec}{\mathbf p}\) \(\newcommand{\qvec}{\mathbf q}\) \(\newcommand{\svec}{\mathbf s}\) \(\newcommand{\tvec}{\mathbf t}\) \(\newcommand{\uvec}{\mathbf u}\) \(\newcommand{\vvec}{\mathbf v}\) \(\newcommand{\wvec}{\mathbf w}\) \(\newcommand{\xvec}{\mathbf x}\) \(\newcommand{\yvec}{\mathbf y}\) \(\newcommand{\zvec}{\mathbf z}\) \(\newcommand{\rvec}{\mathbf r}\) \(\newcommand{\mvec}{\mathbf m}\) \(\newcommand{\zerovec}{\mathbf 0}\) \(\newcommand{\onevec}{\mathbf 1}\) \(\newcommand{\real}{\mathbb R}\) \(\newcommand{\twovec}[2]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\ctwovec}[2]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\threevec}[3]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cthreevec}[3]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\fourvec}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cfourvec}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\fivevec}[5]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \\ #5 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cfivevec}[5]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \\ #5 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\mattwo}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{rr}#1 \amp #2 \\ #3 \amp #4 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\laspan}[1]{\text{Span}\{#1\}}\) \(\newcommand{\bcal}{\cal B}\) \(\newcommand{\ccal}{\cal C}\) \(\newcommand{\scal}{\cal S}\) \(\newcommand{\wcal}{\cal W}\) \(\newcommand{\ecal}{\cal E}\) \(\newcommand{\coords}[2]{\left\{#1\right\}_{#2}}\) \(\newcommand{\gray}[1]{\color{gray}{#1}}\) \(\newcommand{\lgray}[1]{\color{lightgray}{#1}}\) \(\newcommand{\rank}{\operatorname{rank}}\) \(\newcommand{\row}{\text{Row}}\) \(\newcommand{\col}{\text{Col}}\) \(\renewcommand{\row}{\text{Row}}\) \(\newcommand{\nul}{\text{Nul}}\) \(\newcommand{\var}{\text{Var}}\) \(\newcommand{\corr}{\text{corr}}\) \(\newcommand{\len}[1]{\left|#1\right|}\) \(\newcommand{\bbar}{\overline{\bvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\bhat}{\widehat{\bvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\bperp}{\bvec^\perp}\) \(\newcommand{\xhat}{\widehat{\xvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\vhat}{\widehat{\vvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\uhat}{\widehat{\uvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\what}{\widehat{\wvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\Sighat}{\widehat{\Sigma}}\) \(\newcommand{\lt}{<}\) \(\newcommand{\gt}{>}\) \(\newcommand{\amp}{&}\) \(\definecolor{fillinmathshade}{gray}{0.9}\)

    The Arrhenius acid-base concept defines acids and bases in terms of how they affect the amount of hydronium ions, \(\ce{H_3O^{+}}\), (and by extension hydroxide ions, \(\ce{OH^{-}}\)) in aqueous solutions. Simply, in the Arrhenius definition an acid is a substance that increases the concentration of hydronium ions when it is dissolved in water. This typically occurs when the acid dissociates by loss of a proton to water according to the general equation:

    \[\ce{HA(aq) + H_2O(l) ⇌ H_3O^{+}(aq) + A^{-}(aq)} \label {6.2.1} \]

    where \(\ce{A}\) is the deprotonated form of the acid. For example, what hydrochloric and acetic acid, \(\ce{CH3CO2H}\), have in common is that both increase the amount of hydronium ion when they are dissociated in solution.

    \[\begin{align*} \ce{HCl(aq) + H_2O(l) } &\ce{-> H_3O^+(aq) + Cl^{-}(aq)} \\[4pt] \ce{CH_3CO_2H(aq) + H_2O(l)} &\ce{<=> H_3O^{+}(aq) + CH_3CO_2^{-}(aq)} \end{align*} \nonumber \]

    In terms of the Arrhenius definition, the major difference between hydrochloric and acetic acid is that hydrochloric acid dissociates completely in solution to yield stoichiometric amounts of \(\ce{H_3O^{+}}\), while acetic acid only partially dissociates. Acids like \(\ce{HCl}\) that completely dissociate in water are classified as strong in the Arrhenius definition, while those like acetic acid that do not are classified as weak.

    Although all weak acids incompletely dissociate, the extent of dissociation can vary widely. The relative strengths of weak Arrhenius acids is conveniently expressed in terms of the equilibrium constant for their acid dissociation reaction, \(K_a\).

    \[K_a=\dfrac{[\ce{H^{+}}][\ce{A^{-}}]}{[\ce{HA}]} \nonumber \]

    The pKa values for selected weak acids are given in Table \(\PageIndex{1}\).

    Table \(\PageIndex{1}\): Values of \(K_a\), \(pK_a\), \(K_b\), and \(pK_b\) for selected monoprotic acids.
    Acid \(HA\) \(K_a\) \(pK_a\) \(A^−\) \(K_b\) \(pK_b\)
    *The number in parentheses indicates the ionization step referred to for a polyprotic acid.
    sulfuric acid (2nd ionization) \(HSO_4^−\) \(1.0 \times 10^{−2}\) 1.99 \(SO_4^{2−}\) \(9.8 \times 10^{−13}\) 12.01
    hydrofluoric acid \(HF\) \(6.3 \times 10^{−4}\) 3.20 \(F^−\) \(1.6 \times 10^{−11}\) 10.80
    nitrous acid \(HNO_2\) \(5.6 \times 10^{−4}\) 3.25 \(NO_2^−\) \(1.8 \times 10^{−11}\) 10.75
    formic acid \(HCO_2H\) \(1.78 \times 10^{−4}\) 3.750 \(HCO_2^−\) \(5.6 \times 10^{−11}\) 10.25
    benzoic acid \(C_6H_5CO_2H\) \(6.3 \times 10^{−5}\) 4.20 \(C_6H_5CO_2^−\) \(1.6 \times 10^{−10}\) 9.80
    acetic acid \(CH_3CO_2H\) \(1.7 \times 10^{−5}\) 4.76 \(CH_3CO_2^−\) \(5.8 \times 10^{−10}\) 9.24
    pyridinium ion \(C_5H_5NH^+\) \(5.9 \times 10^{−6}\) 5.23 \(C_5H_5N\) \(1.7 \times 10^{−9}\) 8.77
    hypochlorous acid \(HOCl\) \(4.0 \times 10^{−8}\) 7.40 \(OCl^−\) \(2.5 \times 10^{−7}\) 6.60
    hydrocyanic acid \(HCN\) \(6.2 \times 10^{−10}\) 9.21 \(CN^−\) \(1.6 \times 10^{−5}\) 4.79
    ammonium ion \(NH_4^+\) \(5.6 \times 10^{−10}\) 9.25 \(NH_3\) \(1.8 \times 10^{−5}\) 4.75
    water \(H_2O\) \(1.0 \times 10^{−14}\) 14.00 \(OH^−\) \(1.00\) 0.00
    acetylene \(C_2H_2\) \(1 \times 10^{−26}\) 26.0 \(HC_2^−\) \(1 \times 10^{12}\) −12.0
    ammonia \(NH_3\) \(1 \times 10^{−35}\) 35.0 \(NH_2^−\) \(1 \times 10^{21}\) −21.0

    As can be seen from the table the Ka values for weak acids are less than one (otherwise they would not be weak) and vary over many orders of magnitude. Consequently it is customary to tabulate acid ionization constants as pKa values:

    \[pK_a=-\log K_a \nonumber \]

    Because pKa values essentially place the Ka values on a negative base ten logarithmic scale, the stronger the weak acid, the lower its pKa. Weak acids with larger Ka values will have lower pKa values than weaker acids with smaller Ka. Moreover, each unit increase or decrease in the pKa corresponds to a tenfold increase or decrease in the corresponding Ka.

    While Arrhenius acids increase the concentration of \(\ce{H_3O^{+}}\) in aqueous solution, Arrhenius bases decrease \(\ce{H_3O^{+}}\). Strong bases do this stoichiometrically. Most are hydroxide salts of alkali metals or quaternary ammonium salts that dissociate completely when dissolved in water:

    \[\ce{MOH(aq) -> M^{+}(aq) + OH^{-}(aq)} \nonumber \]

    This added hydroxide decreases the concentration of \(H_3O^+\) by shifting the water autoionization equilibrium towards water.

    \[\ce{2H_2O(l) <=> H_3O^{+}(aq) + OH^{-}(aq)} \nonumber \]

    In contrast, most weak bases react with water to produce an equilibrium concentration of hydroxide ion according to the base dissociation reaction

    \[\ce{B(aq) + H_2O(l) <=> BH^{+}(aq) + OH^{-}(aq)} \nonumber \]

    in which \(\ce{B}\) is the weak base. The ionization constant for this reaction, called the base ionization constant or \(K_b\), is typically used as a measure of a weak base's strength.

    Because both hydroxide and hydronium ion are products of water autoionization, the concentrations of hydronium ion and hydroxide ion in aqueous solution will vary reciprocally with one another. This means that Arrhenius acids can be recognized as substances that decrease the hydroxide concentration and Arrhenius bases as substances that increase it.

    Since the Arrhenius acid-base concept is concerned about the state of the water autoionization reaction, Arrhenius acids and bases may also be recognized by their effect on the solution pH. Arrhenius acids decrease the pH and Arrhenius bases will increase it.

    NOTE

    To qualify as an Arrhenius acid, upon the introduction to water, the chemical must cause, either directly or otherwise:

    • an increase in the aqueous hydronium concentration,
    • a decrease in the aqueous hydroxide concentration, or
    • a decrease in the solution pH.

    Conversely, to qualify as an Arrhenius base, upon the introduction to water, the chemical must cause, either directly or otherwise:

    • a decrease in the aqueous hydronium concentration,
    • an increase in the aqueous hydroxide concentration, or
    • an increase in the solution pH.

    Because the Arrhenius acid-base model defines acids and bases in terms of their impact on the state of an aqueous solution the Arrhenius concept is unable to describe reactions in nonaqueous solvents, gases, molten liquids, and the solid state. Consequently other models should be used to describe reactions involving the transfer of \(H^+\) and other fragments in nonaqueous media.


    6.2: Arrhenius Concept is shared under a not declared license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by Stephen M. Contakes.

    • Was this article helpful?