Skip to main content
Chemistry LibreTexts

8.5: Catalysis in Phase One

  • Page ID
    189971
  • \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \) \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)\(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)\(\newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)

    Reactions in biochemistry are usually catalysed by enzymes. In a catalysed reaction, an alternative pathway is available that makes it easier to get from reactants to products. That doesn't mean that there are fewer steps. In fact, normally there are more steps in a catalysed reaction than there are in an uncatalysed one. It does mean that the overall energy needed to traverse the catalysed barrier is lower than the energy needed to surpass the uncatalysed barrier. It's like taking the stairs up to the second floor rather than taking a running leap at the window: more steps, but overall it will save time.

    So far, the reactions we have seen in glycolysis are just the overall reactions. By looking at the overall reactions, we get a pretty good sense about what is happening at each stage of the pathway. We even get some sense of how those reactions might happen, because we can identify familar nucleophiles and electrophiles that appear to be involved. Here, we will take a more detailed look at the catalytic pathways taken during the first phase of glycolysis.

    Essentially every step of glycolysis involves catalysis, and so the reactions entail cofactors and detailed steps that we have glossed over until now. The first step, phosphorylation of glucose to afford glucose-6-phosphate, requires the consumption of ATP. During that step, the terminal hydroxy group of glucose takes up phosphate from ATP, leaving ADP.

    GLGtoG6P.png

    It seems like that first step should be pretty straightforward, because we think of ATP as this high-energy power source for the cell, so it must be really reactive. ATP is not quite as reactive as you might think, though. That's a good thing. If it reacted too readily, it couldn't travel around the cell at all; it would get hydrolysed the first time it encountered a water molecule, and there really are an awful lot of those in a typical cell. In order to react, the ATP needs to be activated.

    Part of the catalysis of the phosphorylation of glucose simply involves binding ATP to a magnesium ion. Once bound to the magnesium ion, the ATP becomes more electrophilic, because of that positive charge on the magnesium ion.

    GLATPactivate.png

    Although a nucleophile, such as water, is unlikely to donate to ATP -- partly because of the negative charge on the ATP -- it is more likely to donate to ATP once coordination takes place, because the magnesium ion has leveled out that negative charge.

    GLATPactivateNu.png

    Another aspect of catalysis in the phosphorylation of glucose involves the removal of a proton. A hydroxyl group is converted to a phosphate, and a proton is lost. Acid-base catalysis is quite common in biochemistry. There are only a handful of amino acids that commonly participate in deprotonation steps: aspartate, glutamate, lysine, and histidine. All of these residues have two structures in equilibrium: a protonated one and a non-protonated one. The non-protonated form is ready to remove a proton when needed.

    Similarly, acid-base catalysis is carried out by nearby amino acid residues in the active site of the enzyme that carries out the isomerisation of glucose-6-phosphate to fructose-6-phosphate.

    GLG6PtoF6P.png

    Phosphoglucoisomerase accomplishes this task by removing a proton from an alpha position, and also from an O-H group, as well as donation of protons to a different alpha position and a different oxygen.

    GLG6Ptoenolmech.png

    An enol intermediate is the halfway point between the two isomers. If the proton were to be removed from that end hydroxy group, and a proton put back in the alpha position again, the structure would return to the original G6P. If, instead, a proton is removed from the second hydroxyl group along the chain, a different structure results.

    GLenoltoF6Pmech.png

    Of course, the same sort of catalytic requirements arise again during the conversion of F6P to FBP. ATP must be activated by magnesium, and proton transfers must be carried out by acidic and basic amino acid residues.

    GLF6PtoFBP.png

    The magnesium will bind to the ATP in order to reduce the amount of negative charge. That way, the nucleophilic alcohol can donate electrons more easily. The proton from the alcohol group can be removed by an amino acid side chain, such as the negatively charged carboxylate of aspartate or glutamate, or a neutral histidine.

    GLF6PtoFBPmech.png

    A completely different kind of catalysis occurs during the scission step of phase one, when the six-carbon sugar is cleaved into a pair of three-carbon sugars. You may recall that this cleavage is accomplished via a retro-aldol reaction: an aldol reaction goes into reverse, spitting out an enolate or enol and a carbonyl.

    FBPtomix.png

    That retro-aldol step is accomplished via iminium ion catalysis. Very often in biochemical reactions, a lysine residue binds with a carbonyl to form either an iminium ion, containing an electrophilic C=N bond, or an enamine, with a nucleophilic N-C=C unit. The process begins with donation of the lysine, in its non-protonated form, to the carbonyl of FBP.

    GLFBPtocarbinolamine.png

    Frequently, enzymatic reactions are presented in a more condensed form. Multiple steps are shown at once; but not just any steps. In the example below, the FBP reacts with both the lysine and the aspartate at the same time. We never draw three molecules coming together at once, because the probability of three molecules colliding at the same time is just about nil. In this case, that's not a problem; the aspartate and lysine are both part of the same molecule. Furthermore, by this point, the FBP has already bound to the enzyme, so the whole thing is one big assembly.

    GLFBPtoaminolcondensed.png

    Subsequently, the carbinolamine undergoes displacement of water to yield the imine, C=N.

    GLFBPtoimine.png

    Imines and enamines are roughly equivalent to carbonyls and enolates, respectively. Enamines are very good nucleophiles, just like enolates. Enolates are a little better, because of the negative charge. However, even though they are neutral nucleophiles, enamines are almost as good, because the reaction is driven by a less electronegative nitrogen atom; which is more willing to donate its electrons. Furthermore, in the environment of the cell, enamines form much more easily than enolates. That's because there isn't a whole lot of LDA or even NaOH floating around inside your cells. As a result, enamines are often employed as nucleophile in cases where you might think of using an enolate.

    GLenolfamily copy.png
    Exercise \(\PageIndex{1}\)

    Provide mechanisms for the following aldol-like reactions.

    GLaldolcats.png

    Answer

    GLaldolcatsoln.png

    The imine unit isn't an inherently better electrophile than a carbonyl; after all, it contains a less polar C=N bond instead of a C=O bond. However, the nitrogen in an imine is much more basic than the oxygen in a carbonyl. It can be protonated quite easily under biological conditions. The resulting iminium ion, containing the C=N-H+ unit, is an activated electrophile. Of course it reacts much more quickly than a regular carbonyl.

    GLiminiumcat.png

    Because carbonyls can easily form either imines or enamines, they will often be converted into those compounds in order to do reactions. This process is called enamine and imine catalysis.

    Aldol reactions are actually reversible. A retro-aldol reaction is just the aldol reaction going in reverse. In that case, an enolate or an enol or an enamine might come out as a leaving group, rather than acting as the initial nucleophile.

    Exercise \(\PageIndex{2}\)

    Provide mechanisms for the following retro-aldol reactions.

    GLretroaldolcats.png
    Answer

    GLretroaldolcatsoln.png

    In the context of a retro-aldol reaction, we need to think about the catalysis backwards. Instead of an iminium ion acting as an activated intermediate to receive a nucleophile, it is accepting electrons to form a leaving group. Instead of having an enolate leaving group in the retro-aldol reaction, we have an enamine leaving group.

    GLFBPiminebreak.png

    The lysine group, which just came on board to catalyse the reaction, is liberated by addition of a water molecule.

    GLFBPiminehydrolysis.png

    There is one last reaction in phase one, the fifth overall in glycolysis. It's the conversion of DHAP to G3P; but that's just another keto-enol tautomerism. The catalytic mechanisms will be very much like those seen in the conversion of G6P to F6P.

    GLDHAPtoG3P.png

    Basic amino acid sites such as neutral histidine and anionic aspartate can readily remove a proton, whereas the corresponding conjugates can supply a proton. Tautomerism simply requires removal of a proton from an alpha position. When a proton is returned, it goes to the other end of the double bond in the enol.

    GLDHAPtoG3Pmechenz.png

    This page titled 8.5: Catalysis in Phase One is shared under a CC BY-NC 3.0 license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by Chris Schaller via source content that was edited to the style and standards of the LibreTexts platform; a detailed edit history is available upon request.