Skip to main content
Library homepage
 

Text Color

Text Size

 

Margin Size

 

Font Type

Enable Dyslexic Font
Chemistry LibreTexts

9.S: Titrimetric Methods (Summary)

( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)

In a titrimetric method of analysis, the volume of titrant reacting stoichiometrically with a titrand provides quantitative information about the amount of analyte in a sample. The volume of titrant corresponding to this stoichiometric reaction is called the equivalence point. Experimentally we determine the titration’s end point using an indicator that changes color near the equivalence point. Alternatively, we can locate the end point by continuously monitoring a property of the titrand’s solution—absorbance, potential, and temperature are typical examples—that changes as the titration progresses. In either case, an accurate result requires that the end point closely match the equivalence point. Knowing the shape of a titration curve is critical to evaluating the feasibility of a titrimetric method.

Many titrations are direct, in which the analyte participates in the titration as the titrand or the titrant. Other titration strategies may be used when a direct reaction between the analyte and titrant is not feasible. In a back titration a reagent is added in excess to a solution containing the analyte. When the reaction between the reagent and the analyte is complete, the amount of excess reagent is determined by a titration. In a displacement titration the analyte displaces a reagent, usually from a complex, and the amount of displaced reagent is determined by an appropriate titration.

Titrimetric methods have been developed using acid–base, complexation, redox, and precipitation reactions. Acid–base titrations use a strong acid or a strong base as a titrant. The most common titrant for a complexation titration is EDTA. Because of their stability against air oxidation, most redox titrations use an oxidizing agent as a titrant. Titrations with reducing agents also are possible. Precipitation titrations often involve Ag+ as either the analyte or titrant.

9.6.1 Key Terms

acid–base titration
acidity
alkalinity
argentometric titration
asymmetric equivalence point
auxiliary complexing agent
auxiliary oxidizing agent
auxiliary reducing agent
back titration
buret
complexation titration
conditional formation constant
direct titration
displacement titration
end point
equivalence point
Fajans method
formal potential
Gran plot
indicator
Jones reductor
Kjeldahl analysis
leveling
metallochromic indicator
Mohr method
potentiometric titration
precipitation titration
redox indicator
redox titration
spectrophotometric titration
symmetric equivalence point
thermometric titration
titrand
titrant
titration curve
titration error
titrimetry
Volhard method
Walden reductor
<

References

  1. (a) Willis, C. J. J. Chem. Educ. 1981, 58, 659–663; (b) Nakagawa, K. J. Chem. Educ. 1990, 67, 673–676; (c) Gordus, A. A. J. Chem. Educ. 1991, 68, 759–761; (d) de Levie, R. J. Chem. Educ. 1993, 70, 209–217; (e) Chaston, S. J. Chem. Educ. 1993, 70, 878–880; (f) de Levie, R. Anal. Chem. 1996, 68, 585–590.
  2. (a) Currie, J. O.; Whiteley, R. V. J. Chem. Educ. 1991, 68, 923–926; (b) Breneman, G. L.; Parker, O. J. J. Chem. Educ. 1992, 69, 46–47; (c) Carter, D. R.; Frye, M. S.; Mattson, W. A. J. Chem. Educ. 1993, 70, 67–71; (d) Freiser, H. Concepts and Calculations in Analytical Chemistry, CRC Press: Boca Raton, 1992.
  3. Meites, L.; Goldman, J. A. Anal. Chim. Acta 1963, 29, 472–479.
  4. Ferek, R. J.; Lazrus, A. L.; Haagenson, P. L.; Winchester, J. W. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1983, 17, 315–324.
  5. (a) Molnár-Perl, I.; Pintée-Szakács, M. Anal. Chim. Acta 1987, 202, 159–166; (b) Barbosa, J.; Bosch, E.; Cortina, J. L.; Rosés, M. Anal. Chim. Acta 1992, 256, 177–181.
  6. (a) Gonzalez, A. G.; Asuero, A. G. Anal. Chim. Acta 1992, 256, 29–33; (b) Papanastasiou, G.; Ziogas, I.; Kokkindis, G. Anal. Chim. Acta 1993, 277, 119–135.
  7. Alexio, L. M.; Godinho, O. E. S.; da Costa, W. F. Anal. Chim. Acta 1992, 257, 35–39.
  8. Steele, A.; Hieftje, G. M. Anal. Chem. 1984, 56, 2884–2888.
  9. (a) Gratzl, M.; Yi, C. Anal. Chem. 1993, 65, 2085–2088; (b) Yi, C.; Gratzl, M. Anal. Chem. 1994, 66, 1976–1982; (c) Hui, K. Y.; Gratzl, M. Anal. Chem. 1997, 69, 695–698; (d) Yi, C.; Huang, D.; Gratzl, M. Anal. Chem. 1996, 68, 1580–1584; (e) Xie, H.; Gratzl, M. Anal. Chem. 1996, 68, 3665–3669.
  10. Schwartz, L. M. J. Chem. Educ. 1992, 69, 879–883.
  11. (a) Boiani, J. A. J. Chem. Educ. 1986, 63, 724–726; (b) Castillo, C. A.; Jaramillo, A. J. Chem. Educ. 1989, 66, 341.
  12. Prada, S.; Guekezian, M.; Suarez-Iha, M. E. V. Anal. Chim. Acta 1996, 329, 197–202.
  13. Sporek, K. F. Anal. Chem. 1958, 30, 1030–1032.
  14. Vončina, D. B.; Dobčnik, D.; Gomišček, S. Anal. Chim. Acta 1992, 263, 147–153.

9.S: Titrimetric Methods (Summary) is shared under a CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by LibreTexts.

  • Was this article helpful?

Support Center

How can we help?