Optional Experiment
- Page ID
- 60893
\( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)
\( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)
\( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)
( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)
\( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)
\( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)
\( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)
\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)
\( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\)
\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)
\( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)
\( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)
\( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\)
\( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)
\( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\)
\( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)
\( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)
\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)
\( \newcommand{\vectorA}[1]{\vec{#1}} % arrow\)
\( \newcommand{\vectorAt}[1]{\vec{\text{#1}}} % arrow\)
\( \newcommand{\vectorB}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)
\( \newcommand{\vectorC}[1]{\textbf{#1}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vectorD}[1]{\overrightarrow{#1}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vectorDt}[1]{\overrightarrow{\text{#1}}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vectE}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{\mathbf {#1}}}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)
\( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)
Chronocoulometry (CC) is a technique in which the CA i-t is integrated to give charge, Q, vs. time, t, where Q = ∫ i dt. The current, i, is the rate of electrolysis at any given time, t, and Q is the amount of charge transferred to time, t. In the case of an electron-transfer reaction, we can integrate the Cottrell relationship, denoting the Q due to a diffusing species as Qdiff.
\[Q_{diff}=\dfrac{2nFAC^b\, D^{1/2}\,t^{1/2}}{π^{1/2}}\tag{6}\]
The total charge, QT, is comprised of two other components: the Qdl due to charging the double layer, as already discussed, and Qads, due to electrolysis of any electroactive species adsorbed on the electrode surface [i.e., QT = Qdiff + Q dl + Qads]. Since the latter two terms are time independent (involves charge only of the surface), a plot of Q vs. t1/2 should be linear with the extrapolated intercept at t = o due to Qdl + Qads.
With the i-t data from the chronoamperometry of ferricyanide reduction or FCA oxidation, obtain Q values at times of 50 mS, 100 mS, 200 mS and 300 mS. Plot Q vs. t1/2 and obtain the intercept value, which is due to Qdl. Is this value reasonable for the charging of the double-layer?