How does Crystal Field theory change if the complexes are not octahedral?
- Page ID
- 11142
Consider a tetragonal case:
Need to introduce additional parameters, δ1 and δ2
The situation is such that E(x2–y2) – E(xy) = 10Dq (moving the ligand along the z axis should have no effect on the relative energies of the orbitals in the xy plane).
For compression case :
[E(x2–y2) + δ2] – [E(xy) + 2δ1] = 10Dq
[E(x2–y2) – E(xy)] + δ2 - 2δ1 = 10Dq
10Dq + δ2 -2δ1 = 10 Dq
δ2 = 2δ1
Can we predict when this will happen? Yes, using the Jahn-Teller theorem
Jahn-Teller Theorem: In a nonlinear molecule a degenerate electronic state will distort to remove the degeneracy and to increase the stability
Consider d1
In an Oh geometry, the electronic state is triply degenerate (the single electron can be in one of three orbitals of identical energy).
Axial elongation gives a state that is still degenerate (doubly) so would need to further distort.
Axial compression leads to a singly degenerate state and increased stability.
LFSE = –4Dq – 2δ1
This should occur even if all the ligands are the same!
Which configurations should be J-T active?
configuration
active?
distortion geometry
d1
yes
compression
d2
yes
elongation
d3
no
d4 (hs)
yes
either
d4 (ls)
yes
compression
d5 (hs)
no
d5 (ls)
yes
elongation
d6 (hs)
yes
compression
d6 (ls)
no
d7 (hs)
yes
elongation
d7 (ls)
yes
either
d8
no
d9
yes
either, (nearly always is elongation to CN = 4)
d10
no
Tetrahedral Complexes
Tetrahedral symmetry is fairly common but can not be treated as a distortion from Oh
Ligands between axes are destabilized, ligands along axes are stabilized.
The splitting in Td complexes is always less than the splitting in Oh complexes with the same ligands (Δt < Δo). (Fewer ligands give a smaller electrostatic field; in the exact ionic limit .)
This means that Td complexes are always high spin and usually bluer.