3.7: Thermodynamics from Electrochemistry
- Page ID
- 516286
\( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)
\( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)
\( \newcommand{\dsum}{\displaystyle\sum\limits} \)
\( \newcommand{\dint}{\displaystyle\int\limits} \)
\( \newcommand{\dlim}{\displaystyle\lim\limits} \)
\( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)
( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)
\( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)
\( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)
\( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)
\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)
\( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\)
\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)
\( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)
\( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)
\( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\)
\( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)
\( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\)
\( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)
\( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)
\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)
\( \newcommand{\vectorA}[1]{\vec{#1}} % arrow\)
\( \newcommand{\vectorAt}[1]{\vec{\text{#1}}} % arrow\)
\( \newcommand{\vectorB}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)
\( \newcommand{\vectorC}[1]{\textbf{#1}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vectorD}[1]{\overrightarrow{#1}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vectorDt}[1]{\overrightarrow{\text{#1}}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vectE}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{\mathbf {#1}}}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)
\(\newcommand{\longvect}{\overrightarrow}\)
\( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)
\(\newcommand{\avec}{\mathbf a}\) \(\newcommand{\bvec}{\mathbf b}\) \(\newcommand{\cvec}{\mathbf c}\) \(\newcommand{\dvec}{\mathbf d}\) \(\newcommand{\dtil}{\widetilde{\mathbf d}}\) \(\newcommand{\evec}{\mathbf e}\) \(\newcommand{\fvec}{\mathbf f}\) \(\newcommand{\nvec}{\mathbf n}\) \(\newcommand{\pvec}{\mathbf p}\) \(\newcommand{\qvec}{\mathbf q}\) \(\newcommand{\svec}{\mathbf s}\) \(\newcommand{\tvec}{\mathbf t}\) \(\newcommand{\uvec}{\mathbf u}\) \(\newcommand{\vvec}{\mathbf v}\) \(\newcommand{\wvec}{\mathbf w}\) \(\newcommand{\xvec}{\mathbf x}\) \(\newcommand{\yvec}{\mathbf y}\) \(\newcommand{\zvec}{\mathbf z}\) \(\newcommand{\rvec}{\mathbf r}\) \(\newcommand{\mvec}{\mathbf m}\) \(\newcommand{\zerovec}{\mathbf 0}\) \(\newcommand{\onevec}{\mathbf 1}\) \(\newcommand{\real}{\mathbb R}\) \(\newcommand{\twovec}[2]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\ctwovec}[2]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\threevec}[3]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cthreevec}[3]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\fourvec}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cfourvec}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\fivevec}[5]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \\ #5 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cfivevec}[5]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \\ #5 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\mattwo}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{rr}#1 \amp #2 \\ #3 \amp #4 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\laspan}[1]{\text{Span}\{#1\}}\) \(\newcommand{\bcal}{\cal B}\) \(\newcommand{\ccal}{\cal C}\) \(\newcommand{\scal}{\cal S}\) \(\newcommand{\wcal}{\cal W}\) \(\newcommand{\ecal}{\cal E}\) \(\newcommand{\coords}[2]{\left\{#1\right\}_{#2}}\) \(\newcommand{\gray}[1]{\color{gray}{#1}}\) \(\newcommand{\lgray}[1]{\color{lightgray}{#1}}\) \(\newcommand{\rank}{\operatorname{rank}}\) \(\newcommand{\row}{\text{Row}}\) \(\newcommand{\col}{\text{Col}}\) \(\renewcommand{\row}{\text{Row}}\) \(\newcommand{\nul}{\text{Nul}}\) \(\newcommand{\var}{\text{Var}}\) \(\newcommand{\corr}{\text{corr}}\) \(\newcommand{\len}[1]{\left|#1\right|}\) \(\newcommand{\bbar}{\overline{\bvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\bhat}{\widehat{\bvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\bperp}{\bvec^\perp}\) \(\newcommand{\xhat}{\widehat{\xvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\vhat}{\widehat{\vvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\uhat}{\widehat{\uvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\what}{\widehat{\wvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\Sighat}{\widehat{\Sigma}}\) \(\newcommand{\lt}{<}\) \(\newcommand{\gt}{>}\) \(\newcommand{\amp}{&}\) \(\definecolor{fillinmathshade}{gray}{0.9}\)Electrochemistry for indirect measurement of free energy
Many reactions (particularly biochemical) consist of multiple coupled half-reactions. It is often not possible to measure all of these half-reactions against one known half-cell to determine their reduction potentials. Many reduction potentials are arrived at indirectly using the fact that \(\Delta G\) is a state function and thus so is Eo because \(\Delta_r G = -n_e FE\). This means we can calculate an Eo by following any path that overall leads to the same electrochemical change. As a generic example consider three half-cell potentials \(\ce{E_1 = E^{o} (A->B)}\) , \(\ce{E_2 = E^{o} (B->C)}\) and \(\ce{E_3 = E^{o} (A->C)}\). We know that:
\[\ce{\Delta G^{o}_1 (A->B) + \Delta G^{o}_2 (B->C)= \Delta G^{o}_3 (A->C)} \nonumber\]
Using \(\Delta_r G = -n_e FE\) to replace the free energies gives us:
\[-n_{e1} FE^{o}_1+-n_{e2} FE^{o}_2= -n_{e3} FE^{o}_3 \nonumber\]
Thus as long as we know two of the three cell potentials and all ne's (moles e- in each reduction), we can solve for the third Eo. We could also solve for an unknown number of electrons transferred knowing all the potentials and two of the ne's. The other possibility is to do a complete cycle so that \(\Delta G^o_{overall} = 0\), which means that \(E^o_{overall} = 0\). Then you can solve for the Eo of one reduction in the cycle knowing all the others.
Once Eo is known you can calculate equilibrium constants and \(\Delta G\) from:
\[\Delta G^o = -n_e FE^o\text{,}\quad\Delta G^o = -RTlnK\quad\text{and}\quad E^o = \frac{RT}{n_e F}lnK\]
Given the following half-reactions calculate the \(E^o(\ce{Hg2^{2+} +2e- -> 2Hg(l)})\).
\[\ce{Hg^{2+} +2e- -> Hg(l)}\quad E^o = 0.8535\]
\[\ce{2Hg^{2+} +2e- -> Hg2^{2+}}\quad E^o = 0.911\]
Solution
By inspection two times the first reaction minus the second reaction gives us the desired overall reaction:
\[2(\ce{Hg^{2+} +2e- -> Hg(l)})\quad\text{RXN 1}\\[4pt]
\underline{-(\ce{2Hg^{2+} +2e- -> Hg2^{2+}})\quad\text{RXN 2}}\\[4pt]
\ce{Hg2^{2+} +2e- -> 2Hg(l)}\quad\text{RXN 3} \nonumber\]
The multiplication of RXN 1 by 2 means that there are ne1 = 4, while number electrons transferred in RXN 2 is unchanged at ne2 =2. Calling the desired reaction #3, we can write:
\[n_{e1}FE^o_1 - n_{e2}FE^o_2 = n_{e3}FE^o_3 \implies 2E^o_3 = 4E^o_1 - 2E^o_2\]
So:
\[E^o_3 = \frac{4(0.8535 V) - 2(0.911V)}{2} = 0.796 V\]
Getting to enthalpy and entropy
Electrochemical measurements of cell potentials versus temperature can be used to determine reaction free energies, entropies and enthalpies. This is because \(\Delta_r G = -n_e FE\) under the current galvanic cell conditions. Thus measurement of E, directly gives us the Gibbs free energy. From general thermodynamics we know:
\[ \left( \dfrac{\partial \Delta G}{\partial T} \right)_p = - \Delta S \label{EQ:dGdT} \]
Substituting in -neFE for \(\Delta G\) yields:
\[ nF \left( \dfrac{\partial E}{\partial T} \right)_p = \Delta S \label{EQ:dEdT} \]
So if we measure the slope of the potential at a given temperature we have the \(\Delta S\) of the reaction. Because \(\Delta G = \Delta H - T\Delta S\) we also get \(\Delta H\):
\[\Delta G + T\Delta S= \Delta H \]
If we are at standard conditions for all the reactants we get the standard Gibbs, entropy and enthalpy of reaction.
Consider the following data for the Daniel cell (Buckbeei, Surdzial, & Metz, 1969) which is defined by the following reaction
\[Zn(s) + Cu^{2+}(aq) \rightleftharpoons Zn^{2+}(aq) + Cu(s) \nonumber \]
| T (°C) | 0 | 10 | 20 | 25 | 30 | 40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E (V) | 1.1028 | 1.0971 | 1.0929 | 1.0913 | 1.0901 | 1.0887 |
From a fit of the data to a quadratic function, the temperature dependence of
\[\left( \dfrac{\partial E^o}{\partial T} \right)_p \nonumber \]
is easily established.
The quadratic fit to the data results in
\[\left( \dfrac{\partial E^o}{\partial T} \right)_p = 3.8576 \times 10^{-6} \dfrac{V}{°C^2}(T) - 6.3810 \times 10^{-4} \dfrac{V}{°C} \nonumber \]
So, at 25 °C,
\[\left( \dfrac{\partial E^o}{\partial T} \right)_p = -5.4166 \times 10^{-4} V/K \nonumber \]
noting that \(K\) can be substituted for \(°C\) since in difference they have the same magnitude. So the entropy change calculated using equation \ref{EQ:dEdT} is
\[ \Delta S = nF \left( \dfrac{\partial E^o}{\partial T} \right)_p = (2\,mol)(96485\,C/mol) (-5.4166 \times 10^{-4} V/K) \nonumber \]
Because
\[ 1\,C \times 1\,V = 1\,J \nonumber \]
The standard entropy change for the Daniel cell reaction at 25 °C is
\[ \Delta S = -104.5\, J/(mol\,K). \nonumber \]
It is the negative entropy change that leads to an increase in standard cell potential at lower temperatures.


