Skip to main content
Chemistry LibreTexts

16.8 Electrophilic Addition: 1,2- Versus 1,4-Addition

  • Page ID
  • \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \) \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)\(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)



    After completing this section, you should be able to

    1. write an equation for the addition of one or two mole equivalents of a halogen or a hydrogen halide to a nonconjugated diene.
    2. write an equation for the addition of one or two mole equivalents of a halogen or a hydrogen halide to a conjugated diene.
    3. write the mechanism for the addition of one mole equivalent of hydrogen halide to a conjugated diene, and hence account for the formation of 1,2- and 1,4-addition products.
    4. explain the stability of allylic carbocations in terms of resonance.
    5. draw the resonance contributors for a given allylic carbocation.
    6. predict the products formed from the reaction of a given conjugated diene with one mole equivalent of halogen or hydrogen halide.
    7. predict which of the possible 1,2- and 1,4-addition products is likely to predominate when one mole equivalent of a hydrogen halide is reacted with a given conjugated diene.
    8. use the concept of carbocation stability to explain the ratio of the products obtained when a given conjugated diene is reacted with one mole equivalent of hydrogen halide.
    Key Terms

    Make certain that you can define, and use in context, the key terms below.

    • 1,2-addition
    • 1,4-addition
    Study Notes

    Notice that the numbers used in the expressions 1,2-addition and 1,4-addition do not refer to the positions of the carbon atoms in the diene molecule. Here, 1,2 indicates two neighbouring carbon atoms, while 1,4 indicates two carbon atoms which are separated in the carbon chain by two additional carbon atoms. Thus in 1,2- and 1,4-additions to 2,4-hexadiene, the additions actually occur at carbons 2 and 3, and 2 and 5, respectively.

    The term “monoadduct” should be interpreted as meaning the product or products formed when one mole of reagent adds to one mole of substrate. In the objectives above, this process is referred to as the addition of one mole equivalent (or one mol equiv).

    In Section 7.9 we saw that electrophilic addition to a simple alkene would follow Markovnikov’s rule, where the stability of the carbocation intermediate would increase: primary < secondary < tertiary. With conjugated dienes the allylic carbocation intermediately generated has different resonance forms. The following scheme represents the mechanism for the addition of HBr to 1,3-butadiene (at 0°C). Note the resonance contributors for the allylic carbocation intermediate and that the product resulting from the secondary cation is generated in higher yield than from the primary cation as you might expect from our discussions until now. However, in the next section you will see that the resulting product ratio can be drastically affected by a number of reaction conditions, including temperature.

    1,2 and 1,4 hydrogen bromide addition to 1,3-butadiene

    In Section 7.9 we saw that electrophilic addition to a simple alkene would follow Markovnikov’s rule. Markovnikov's rule states that for the electrophilic addition of HX, the carbocation intermediate forms on the double bond carbon with the greatest number of alkyl substitutents. Because the stability of carbocation intermediates increases as it number of alky groups increases (primary < secondary < tertiary), this regioselectivity is provided by preferably forming a more stable carbocation intermediate during the reaction. During the electrophilic addition of HBr to 2-methylpropene, the more stable tertiary carbocation intermediate is preferably formed which yields the Markovnikov addition product 2-bromo-2-methylpropane. Formation of 1-bromo-2-methylpropane does not occur because it would require the formation of a less stable primary carbocation intermediate. 

    Example 1.png

    When an electrophilic addition is performed on a non-conjugated diene, the double bonds react in much the same manner as individual alkenes. During the addition of two equivalents of HBr to 1,4-pentadiene, a non-conjugated diene, Markovnikov's rule is still followed producing 2,4-dibromopentane as the product. 


    Example 2.svg


    Conjugated dienes undergo the usual reactions of alkenes, such as catalytic hydrogenation, radical additions, and electrophilic additions more readily than most alkenes or dienes that have isolated double bonds. During the electrophilic addition of one equivalent of HX to a conjugated diene, the expected Markovnikov addition product is formed during a process called 1,2-addition. In addition, an unexpected product is formed from 1,4-addition, i.e. the halogen bonds at the terminal carbon atoms of a conjugated diene and the remaining double bond shifts to the 2,3-location. Note, the numbers (1 and 4) refer to which of the four carbons making up the conjugated diene the H and Br are bonded to in the products and are not used for the compounds IUPAC nomenclature. Although there are various methods for effecting the relative ratio of 1,2 and 1,4 addition products during the electrophilic addition to a conjugated diene, a mixture of these products is almost always produced. When one equivalent HBr undergoes electrophilic addition to 1,3-butadiene, 1,2 addition provides the expected Markovnikov product 3-bromo-1-butene in a 70% yield. This process is called a 1,2 addition because the hydrogen from HBr (labeled blue) bonds to the first carbon of the diene and the bromine from HBr bonds to the second carbon of the diene. The compound 1-bromo-2-butene is also produced in a 30% yield during the reaction as product of 1,4 addition. Here the hydrogen of HBr bonds to the first carbon of the diene and the Br bonds to the fourth carbon of the diene. 

    Example 3.png

    The Mechanism for Electrophilic Addition of HBr to a Conjugated Diene

    Regardless if the 1,2 or 1,4 addition product is formed, the first step of the mechanism is the protonation of one of the double bonds. In the same manner as the electrophilic addition of HX to an alkene, the protonation occurs regioselectively to give the more stable carbocation. In the case of a conjugated diene, the more stable cation is not only secondary, but also allylic, and therefore enjoys the stabilization created from the positive charge being distributed over two carbons by resonance. The resonance hybrid of the allylic carbocation intermediate can be depicted by two resonance forms (shown below) both of which have a full positive charge.

    Step 1)

    Mechansim Step 1.png

    This allylic carbocation, more properly denoted as the resonance hybrid shown below, has two carbons which have significant positive charge. The halide ion can attack either carbon. Attacking the central carbon, adjacent to the site of protonation, leads to the the 1,2-addition product. Attacking the terminal carbon, distant from the site of protonation, leads to the 1,4 addition product. 

    Mechanism step 2.png

    Other Electrophilic Additions

    Formation of both 1,2- and 1,4-addition products occurs not only with hydrogen halides, but also with other electrophiles such as the halogens (X2). The electrophilic addition of bromine to 1,3-butadiene is an example. As shown below, a roughly 50:50 mixture of 3,4-dibromo-1-butene (the expected 1,2 addition product) and 1,4-dibromo-2-butene (the 1,4 addition product) is obtained. The double bond of the 1,4 addition product is primarily formed as the (E) isomer.

    Example 4.png

    Worked Example \(\PageIndex{1}\)

    Give the expected products from the following reaction. Show both 1,2 and 1,4 addition products.

    Worked Example 1.png


    For this example the two double bonds in the diene are not equivalent and must be considered separately.  Each double bond of the reactant has the possibility of forming a 1,2 and a 1,4 addition product so the reaction has the possibility of forming four product.  Protonate each double bond separately and draw out the resonance forms of the allylic carbocation intermediate created.  Then react each resonance form with Br- to create the two possible products.  Repeat this process with the second double bond to create the four possible product.  Lastly, look for symmetry in the products to see if any are same molecule.  Also, consider the stability of each carbocation created during this process.  The most stable carbocation will generally product the favored product of the reaction. 

    Addition to the first double bond creates a resonance form with a tertiary carbocation intermediate.  Due to the stability of the tertiary carbocation this product will most likely go one to be the prefered product of this reaction. 

    Worked Example2.png

    Addition to the second double bond creates a symmetrical compound so only one product is formed.

    Worked Example3.png

    Over the reaction proposed would be expected to form three products. 


    Worked Example 4.png


    Exercise \(\PageIndex{1}\)

    1) Give the 1,2 and the 1,4 products of the addition of one equivalent of HBr to 1,3-hexa-diene.


    2) Look at the previous addition reaction of HBr with a diene. Consider the transition states, predict which of them would be the major products and which will be the minor.

    3) Write out the products of 1,2 addition and 1,4- addition of HBr to 1,3-cyclohexadiene.

    4) What is unusual about the products of 1,2- and 1,4- addition of HX to an unsubstituted cyclic 1,3-diene?

    5) Write out the products of 1,2 addition and 1,4- addition of Br2 to 1,3-cyclohexadiene.




    2) The products i-iii all show a secondary cation intermediate which is more stable than primary. Therefore those would be major products and the iv product would be the minor product.


    3) The same product will result from 1,2 and 1,4 addition.

    Answer to 1.gif

    4) Addition of the HX to unsubstituted cycloalka-1,3-dienes in either 1,2- or 1,4- manner gives the same product because of symmetry.

    5) Both 1,2 and 1,4 products will form.

    Answer to 1 B.gif

    Contributors and Attributions

    • Dr. Dietmar Kennepohl FCIC (Professor of Chemistry, Athabasca University)

    • Prof. Steven Farmer (Sonoma State University)

    • John D. Robert and Marjorie C. Caserio (1977) Basic Principles of Organic Chemistry, second edition. W. A. Benjamin, Inc. , Menlo Park, CA. ISBN 0-8053-8329-8. This content is copyrighted under the following conditions, "You are granted permission for individual, educational, research and non-commercial reproduction, distribution, display and performance of this work in any format."

    This page titled 16.8 Electrophilic Addition: 1,2- Versus 1,4-Addition is shared under a not declared license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by Layne Morsch.

    • Was this article helpful?