9.6: Coordination Frameworks

Last updated
Save as PDF

Page ID: 377701

\( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \) \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)\(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)\(\newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)

Bridging ligands link metals in multicenter coordination complexes

Some ambidentate and multidentate ligands have the capacity to bridge two metal centers. For instance, the cyano ligands can bridge two metal centers by forming linear links of the type

\[\ce{M-CN-M'} \nonumber \]

Linkages like these can be used to bridge multiple metal centers in a cluster or network solid, the latter of which is sometimes called a coordination framework. When the cyano ligand is combined with octahedral metal centers possessing 90\(^{\circ}\) L-M-L bond angles, a cubic coordination network results. An example is the Prussian Blue coordination framework, which possesses the unit cell depicted in Figure \(\sf{\PageIndex{1A}}\).

Figure \(\sf{\PageIndex{1}}\). (A) Idealized unit cell of Prussian Blue showing the cubic coordination framework of interconnected [Fe^II(CN)₆]^4- and Fe³⁺ units. Because the ratio of Fe³⁺ to [Fe^II(CN)₆]^4- is 4:3, some of the [Fe^II(CN)₆]^4- sites are occupied by aqua ligands. (B) Structure of a Hofmann-type clathrate consisting of layers of square planar [Ni(CN)₄]^2- units linked by Ni(NH₃)₂²⁺ units. In this structure water occupies the sites between the layers, but structures like these can adjust to accommodate a variety of organic molecules. Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. Rendered from the structures reported in references 1. This work by Stephen Contakes is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The cubic network shown in Figure \(\sf{\PageIndex{1A}}\) reflects the 3D structure of the octahedron, in which the M-L bonds point along the x, y, and z axes. If a square planar metal center is used, a 2D coordination network comprising interlinked squares is produced instead. An example is the Hofmann clathrate shown in Figure \(\sf{\PageIndex{1B}}\), which depicts a Hofmann clathrate in which square planar [Ni(CN)₄]^2- units are linked by trans-Ni(NH₃)₂²⁺ units (which are octahedral but have a square plane of open coordination sites perpendicular to the NH₃-Ni-NH₃ axis).

The structures of coordination polyhedra and frameworks reflect ligand and metal coordination geometries

As illustrated by the Prussian Blue and Hofmann clathrate coordination networks shown in Figure \(\sf{\PageIndex{1}}\), the structures formed when a bridging ligand links multiple metal centers depends on the geometry of the centers, the ligand, and the metal-ligand bonds formed. Because the directionality of metal-ligand bonding in many types of complexes is well-characterized and predictable, it is possible to design metal complexes and linkers that can serve as building blocks for clusters and networks. In particular

metal complexes with combinations of labile (substitutable) ligands in particular topologies. These insure that the linking ligand will be arranged around the metal center in those defined directions.
Ligands that possess binding sites oriented in defined directions so that they link the metal centers together in particular topologies.

Examples of the sort of metal centers that can be used and examples of linking ligands are given in Figure \(\sf{\PageIndex{2}}\).

Figure \(\sf{\PageIndex{2}}\). The directionality of M-L bonding permits the rational construction of structures using metal and ligand “building blocks”. For example, (A) Tetrahedral, octahedral, and square planar metal centers alone can be used to connect sets of ligands at 90\(^{\circ}\), 109.5\(^{\circ}\), and 180\(^{\circ}\) bond angles in a variety of arrangements while (B) the selection of organic linkers shown can be used as linear, trigonal planar, and tetrahedral linkers.

Examples of how the building blocks shown in Figure \(\sf{\PageIndex{2}}\) might be used to prepare molecular polyhedra and coordination networks are depicted schematically as shown in Figure \(\sf{\PageIndex{3}}\). Among the examples shown in Figure \(\sf{\PageIndex{3}}\), those depicted on the right schematize the Hofmann clathrate (top) and Prussian Blue (bottom) coordination networks of Figure \(\sf{\PageIndex{1}}\).

Figure \(\sf{\PageIndex{3}}\). Examples illustrating how the combination of metal and organic linker units gives rise to polyhedral and network structures that reflect the geometry of the building blocks used.

Figure \(\sf{\PageIndex{4}}\). In its structure, the Pt(en)²⁺ centers possess *cis*-90\(^{\circ}\) coordination sites linked by the linear linker 4,4'-bipyridine.

A wider variety of structures are possible than those hinted at by the building blocks and structures shown in Figures \(\sf{\PageIndex{2}}\) and \(\sf{\PageIndex{3}}\). More may be obtained using the principles of molecular structure outlined in the sections on coordination geometry, ligands, and isomerism. In fact, one of the first coordination polyhedra prepared involved Jean-Marie Lehn's recognition that planar bidentate ligands in a tetrahedral bis-chelate are oriented perpendicular to one another, as shown in Figures \(\sf{\PageIndex{5A}}\). This enabled him to prepare a molecular trigonal prism by combining a source of Cu²⁺ with the trigonal planar and linear-capable organic linkers that bind the Cu²⁺ in bidentate fashion, as shown in Figure \(\sf{\PageIndex{5B}}\).

Figure \(\sf{\PageIndex{5}}\). (A) When a tetrahedral metal center is coordinated by two planar bidentate ligands, the ligands are oriented at 90\(^{\circ}\) to one another. (B) This permitted Jean Marie-Lehn and his cowokers to prepare a molecular trigonal prism consisting of six Cu²⁺ ions linked by the rigid and semirigid nitrogen-containing ligands on the prism's trigonal faces and rectangular edges as shown. Redrawn from structures given in reference 3.

Metal Organic Frameworks (MOFs) are porous coordination polymers in which metal "building units" are connected by rigid organic ligand "struts"

One class of coordination frameworks that has received much attention over the past 25 years is the metal organic frameworks (MOFs). These consist of metal centers linked by rigid organic ligands to give a porous structure similar to those of the aluminosilicate-based zeolites. The structure of one MOF, called MIL-53, is given in Figure \(\sf{\PageIndex{6A}}\).

Figure \(\sf{\PageIndex{6}}\). In metal organic frameworks containing carboxylate ligands, the two oxygens in each carboxylate usually bind to different metal centers. A simple example involves the structure of MIL-53, in which linear p-terephthalato (1,4'-benzenedicarboxylato or BDC) ligands bridge chains of linked MO₆ octahedra. (A) Structure of MIL-53 showing the open structure of the MOF, indicated by the yellow spheres. (B) Top-down image of an MIL-53 structure showing how the carboxylic acid oxygens in the BDC ligands coordinate two different metals. The image in part A is by Tony Boehle - Tony Boehle, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/inde...curid=10328580 The image in part B is rendered from the jmol structure of MIL-53(Sc) at https://www.chemtube3d.com/mof-mil53sc-2/

As can be seen from the overall structure of MIL-53 depicted in Figure \(\sf{\PageIndex{6A}}\), the structure possesses large rhombic prismatic voids, represented by the yellow spheres. These voids can in principle be occupied by small molecule substrates. Because of MOF's potential to bind and store substrates, there is considerable interest in developing MOFs that are useful for storing and separating particular gases.

A closer look at the structure of MIL-53 reveals that the carboxylate oxygens in the benzenedicarboxylato (BDU) linkers span two different metal centers rather than binding to only one. As explained in Figure \(\sf{\PageIndex{7}}\), this binding mode enables the formation of rigid stable networks, although it requires the use of metal building blocks in which two or more metal centers are held in close proximity.

Figure \(\sf{\PageIndex{7}}\). The carboxylate groups in the ligands of metal organic frameworks commonly bind \(\kappa\)¹ to two different metal centers rather than \(\kappa\)¹ or \(\kappa\)² to a single center because the single metal \(\kappa\)¹ binding mode is too flexible to give rigid networks while the small chelate rings and narrow bite angles of the \(\kappa\)²chelate rings make them less stable.

In MIL-53, the metal centers that the DBU ligands coordinate are chains of octahedral metal centers bridged by \(\mu_2\) hydroxo ligands. These chains form spontaneously as the network forms under the high temperature conditions of its synthesis. In other cases, metal secondary building units (SBUs) containing the necessary bridging dicarboxylate ligands are used. One common class of metal SBUs used is the paddlewheel carboxylates shown in Figure \(\sf{\PageIndex{8A}}\). These consist of two metals spanned by a square plane of four carboxylates in a paddlewheel arrangment.

Figure \(\sf{\PageIndex{8}}\). Metal organic frameworks do not use a metal center directly but instead employ a metal cluster as a secondary building unit (SBU). (A) Paddlewheel carboxylates are a common SBU. They consist of two metals surrounded by four carboxylato ligands in a square planar "paddlewheel" arrangement. (B) In complexes where the ligands contain additional carboxylates, they function as a planar center in a MOF. An example is the paddlewheel carboxylate present in the HKUST class of MOFs, in which each carboxylato ligand is capable of bridging to three dimetal units. Note that in the structures shown, the axial ligands shown in green may be present or absent depending on the specific metal carboxylate used and/or whether the ligand was removed during processing of the MOF.

The use of paddlewheel carboxylate metal SBUs and bridging organic carboxylate ligands enables the construction of coordination frameworks like that of HKUST-1 shown in Figure \(\sf{\PageIndex{9}}\). The structure of these networks depends on the geometry of the linking ligand. For instance, in HKUST-1 the 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylato bridging ligands each link three paddlewheel SBUs to give the cubic network shown in Figure \(\sf{\PageIndex{9}}\). Other organic carboxylate ligands give different network topologies. In addition, the ability of some paddlewheel carboxylates to coordinate ligands perpendicular to the carboxylates, represented by the ligands marked L? in Figure \(\sf{\PageIndex{8}}\), affords additional opportunities to use these networks to bind substrates that can coordinate those sites.

Figure \(\sf{\PageIndex{9}}\). Desolvated HKUST-1 member of the HKUST class of MOFs showing open regions in the structure. The structure consists of paddlewheel carboxylates linked by trigonal planar tricarboxylate organic SBUs. The image is by Tony Boehle - Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/inde...curid=27424501

Another common metal SBU is the basic zinc acetate structure shown in Figure \(\sf{\PageIndex{10}}\). As shown in Figure \(\sf{\PageIndex{10A}}\), the structure is analogous to those of the basic beryllium acetates and involves an OZn₄tetrahedron in which the tetrahedrally arranged Zn²⁺ are connected by carboxylate ligands spanning the tetrahedron's six edges. When these carboxylate ligands are replaced by rigid dicarboxylates (Figure \(\sf{\PageIndex{10B}}\)), the result is that the Zn₄O core is surrounded by an octahedral coordination sphere of carboxylate ligands (Figure \(\sf{\PageIndex{10C}}\)).

**Figure \(\sf{\PageIndex{10}}\).** (A) Basic zinc acetate is a common SBU used as a pseudooctahedral center in MOFs. (B) Exchange of its acetate ligands with p-terephthalate (1,4-benzenedicarboxylate) linkers gives a complex in which the free dicarboxylates are oriented towards the vertices of an octahedron (C).

Figure \(\sf{\PageIndex{11}}\). A cubic metal organic framework derived from the basic zinc acetate SBU. The structure is called MOF-5 and consists of Zn₄O⁶⁺ pseudooctahedra linked by linear p-terephthalate (1,4-benzenedicarboxylate) ligands. The large golden sphere inside the unit cell has a radius of 12 Angstroms (defined with the aromatic rings oriented as shown) and represents the space available for the framework to accommodate guest molecules. By Tony Boehle - Own work, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/inde...curid=10319204.

The structure of MOF-5 also illustrates how the size of the pores in an MOF structure may be tailored by lengthening or shortening the organic linker. In particular, from Figure \(\sf{\PageIndex{11}}\) it can be seen that the size of the MOF-5's cubic unit cell depends on the length of the organic portion of the carboxylate linker. In MOF-5 this linker consists of a single benzene unit and gives 9-Angstrom pores, while the use of two and three benzene rings increases the pore size to 13 and 16 Angstroms, respectively, as shown in \(\sf{\PageIndex{12}}\).

800px-Isoreticular_metal-organic_frameworks_of_the_IRMOF_family.png — Figure \(\sf{\PageIndex{12}}\). The spacing between metal centers in a coordination network may be tailored by the use of organic linkers of differing lengths. By François-Xavier Coudert - Own work, CC BY 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/inde...curid=89656071

References

1. The structure of Prussian blue is rendered from that reported in Buser, H. J.; Schwarzenbach, D.; Petter, W.; Ludi, A., The crystal structure of Prussian Blue: Fe₄[Fe(CN)₆]₃.xH₂O. Inorganic Chemistry 1977, 16(11), 2704-2710; to simplify depiction of the coordination framework, water molecules were removed. The structure of the Hofmann-type clathrate is rendered from that reported in Rayner, J. H.; Powell, H. M., 688. Crystal structure of a hydrated nickel cyanide ammoniate. Journal of the Chemical Society (Resumed) 1958, 3412-3418.

2. (a) Fujita, M.; Ogura, K., Transition-metal-directed assembly of well-defined organic architectures possessing large voids: From macrocycles to [2] catenanes. Coordination Chemistry Reviews 1996, 148, 249-264. (b) Leininger, S.; Olenyuk, B.; Stang, P. J., Self-Assembly of Discrete Cyclic Nanostructures Mediated by Transition Metals. Chemical Reviews 2000, 100(3), 853-908.

3. Machado, V. G.; Baxter, P. N. W.; Lehn, J.-M., Self-assembly in self-organized inorganic systems: a view of programmed metallosupramolecular architectures. Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society 2001, 12, 431-462.

4. Yaghi, O. M.; O'Keeffe, M.; Ockwig, N. W.; Chae, H. K.; Eddaoudi, M.; Kim, J., Reticular synthesis and the design of new materials. Nature 2003, 423 (6941), 705-714.