6.52 Research Peer Revisions

Last updated
Save as PDF

Page ID: 186675

\( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \) \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)\(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)\(\newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)

6.52 Research Peer RevisionsNow that you've revised your paper significantly on your own, it's time to work with the other students in the class to make some final revisions. Sometimes having another student look at your paper can reveal problems that you didn't even know existed. Attach the file for your research paper to a post below. (Remember to share your document if you used Google docs.) Explain in your post specifically what you're most proud of in your paper so far and what you'd like some help with. Then, go in and help ONE other student revise their paper. Read the paper of the person ABOVE yours, if possible. You should read that draft thoroughly and provide in-depth feedback on their work. Your feedback should be approximately 100 words in length and should include something positive about the text as well as a concrete idea for how the paper could be improved. Note: Please make sure that everyone who has posted a paper has gotten feedback before you review a paper that has already received some help. Be sure to highlight all your required revision work from Session 5 in your final draft, including transitions and rhetorical device. This discussion is worth 30 points, 10 points for posting your draft and 20 points for your in-depth feedback on ONE other student's work.