Skip to main content
Chemistry LibreTexts

20.2: Chemical Potential

  • Page ID
  • \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \) \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)\(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    Equilibrium can be understood as accruing at the composition of a reaction mixture at which the aggregate chemical potential of the products is equal to that of the reactants. Consider the simple reaction

    \[A(g) \rightleftharpoons B(g)\]

    The criterion for equilibrium will be

    \[ \mu_A=\mu_B\]

    If the gases behave ideally, the chemical potentials can be described in terms of the mole fractions of \(A\) and \(B\)

    \[ \mu_A^o + RT \ln\left( \dfrac{P_A}{P_{tot}} \right) = \mu_B^o + RT \ln\left( \dfrac{P_B}{P_{tot}} \right) \label{eq2}\]

    where Dalton’s Law has been used to express the mole fractions.

    \[ \chi_i = \dfrac{P_i}{P_{tot}}\]

    Equation \ref{eq2} can be simplified by collecting all chemical potentials terms on the left

    \[ \mu_A^o - \mu_B^o = RT \ln \left( \dfrac{P_B}{P_{tot}} \right) - RT \ln\left( \dfrac{P_A}{P_{tot}} \right) \label{eq3}\]

    Combining the logarithms terms and recognizing that

    \[\mu_A^o - \mu_B^o =–\Delta G^o\]

    for the reaction, one obtains

    \[–\Delta G^o = RT \ln \left( \dfrac{P_B}{P_{A}} \right)\]

    And since the equilibrium constant is \(P_A/P_B = K_P\) for this reaction (assuming perfectly ideal behavior), one can write

    \[ \Delta G^o = RT \ln K_P\]

    Another way to achieve this result is to consider the Gibbs function change for a reaction mixture in terms of the reaction quotient. The reaction quotient can be expressed as

    \[ Q_P = \dfrac{\prod_i P_i^{\nu_i}}{\prod_j P_j^{\nu_j}} \]

    where \(\nu_i\) are the stoichiometric coefficients for the products, and \(\nu_j\) are those for the reactants. Or if the stoichiometric coefficients are defined by expressing the reaction as a sum

    \[ 0 =\sum_i \nu_i X_i\]

    where \(X_i\) refers to one of the species in the reaction, and \(\nu_i\) is then the stoichiometric coefficient for that species, it is clear that \(\nu_i\) will be negative for a reactant (since its concentration or partial pressure will reduce as the reaction moves forward) and positive for a product (since the concentration or partial pressure will be increasing.) If the stoichiometric coefficients are expressed in this way, the expression for the reaction quotient becomes

    \[Q_P = \prod_i P_i^{\nu_i}\]

    Using this expression, the Gibbs function change for the system can be calculated from

    \[ \Delta G =\Delta G^o + RT \ln Q_P\]

    And since at equilibrium

    \[\Delta G = 0\]



    It is evident that

    \[ \Delta G_{rxn}^o = -RT \ln K_P \label{triangle}\]

    It is in this simple way that \(K_P\) and \(\Delta G^o\) are related.

    It is also of value to note that the criterion for a spontaneous chemical process is that \(\Delta G_{rxn}\ < 0\), rather than \(\Delta G_{rxn}^o\), as is stated in many texts! Recall that \(\Delta G_{rxn}^o\) is a function of all of the reactants and products being in their standard states of unit fugacity or activity. However, the direction of spontaneous change for a chemical reaction is dependent on the composition of the reaction mixture. Similarly, the magnitude of the equilibrium constant is insufficient to determine whether a reaction will spontaneously form reactants or products, as the direction the reaction will shift is also a function of not just the equilibrium constant, but also the composition of the reaction mixture!

    Example \(\PageIndex{1}\):

    Based on the data below at 298 K, calculate the value of the equilibrium constant (\(K_P\)) for the reaction

    \[2 NO(g) + O_2(g) \rightleftharpoons 2 NO_2(g)\]

      \(NO(g)\) \(NO_2(g)\)
    \(G_f^o\) (kJ/mol) 86.55 51.53


    First calculate the value of \(\Delta G_{rxn}^o\) from the \(\Delta G_{f}^o\) data.

    \[ \Delta G_{rxn}^o = 2 \times (51.53 \,kJ/mol) - 2 \times (86.55 \,kJ/mol) = -70.04 \,kJ/mol\]

    And now use the value to calculate \(K_p\) using Equation \ref{triangle}.

    \[ -70040\, J/mol = -(8.314 J/(mol\, K) (298 \, K) \ln K_p\]

    \[ K_p = 1.89 \times 10^{12}\]

    Note: as expected for a reaction with a very large negative \(\Delta G_{rxn}^o\), the equilibrium constant is very large, favoring the formation of the products.


    • Patrick E. Fleming (Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry; California State University, East Bay)


    20.2: Chemical Potential is shared under a not declared license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by Patrick Fleming.