# 1.8: Expressing Numbers - Significant Figures

- Page ID
- 221324

Learning Objectives

- Understand the importance of significant figures in measured numbers.
- Identify the number of significant figures in a reported value.
- Use significant figures correctly in arithmetical operations.

Scientists have established certain conventions for communicating the degree of **precision** of a measurement, which is dependent on the measuring device used. Imagine, for example, that you are using a meterstick to measure the width of a table. The centimeters (cm) marked on the meterstick, tell you how many *centimeters* wide the table is. Many metersticks also have markings for millimeters (mm), so we can measure the table to the nearest *millimeter*. Most metersticks do not have any smaller (or more precise) markings indicated, so you cannot report the measured width of the table any more precise than to the nearest millimeter. However, you can *estimate* one past the smallest marking, in this case the millimeter, to the next decimal place in the measurement (Figure \(\PageIndex{1}\)).

The concept of **significant figures** takes this limitation into account. The significant figures of a measured quantity are defined as all the digits known with *certainty* (those indicated by the markings on the measuring device) * and* the first uncertain, or estimated, digit (one digit past the smallest marking on the measuring device). It makes no sense to report any digits after the first uncertain one, so it is the last digit reported in a measurement. Zeros are used when needed to place the significant figures in their correct positions. Thus, zeros are sometimes counted as significant figures but are sometimes only used as placeholders.

“Sig figs” is a common abbreviation for significant figures.

Consider the earlier example of measuring the width of a table with a meterstick. If the table is measured and reported as being 1,357 mm wide, the number 1,357 has four significant figures. The 1 (thousands place), the 3 (hundreds place), and the 5 (tens place) are certain; the 7 (ones place) is assumed to have been estimated. It would make no sense to report such a measurement as 1,357.0 (five Sig Figs) or 1,357.00 (six Sig Figs) because that would suggest the measuring device was able to determine the width to the nearest tenth or hundredth of a millimeter, when in fact it shows only tens of millimeters and therefore the ones place was estimated.

On the other hand, if a measurement is reported as 150 mm, the 1 (hundreds) and the 5 (tens) are known to be significant, but how do we know whether the zero is or is not significant? The measuring device could have had marks indicating every 100 mm or marks indicating every 10 mm. How can you determine if the zero is significant (the estimated digit), or if the 5 is significant and the zero a value placeholder?

The **rules** for deciding which digits in a measurement are significant are as follows:

- All nonzero digits are significant. In 1,357 mm, all the digits are significant.
*Sandwiched (or embedded) zeros*, those between significant digits, are significant. Thus, 405 g has*three*significant figures.*Leading zeros*, which are zeros at the beginning of a decimal number less than 1, are not significant. In 0.000458 mL, the first four digits are leading zeros and are not significant. The zeros serve only to put the digits 4, 5, and 8 in the correct decimal positions. This number has three significant figures.*Trailing zeros*, which are zeros at the end of a number, are significant only if the number has a decimal point. Thus, in 1,500 m, the two trailing zeros are not significant because the number is written without a decimal point; the number has two significant figures. However, in 1,500.00 m, all six digits are significant because the number has a decimal point.-
Exact numbers can be considered to have an unlimited number of significant figures, as such calculations are not subject to errors in measurement. This may occur:

- By definition (1 minute = 60 seconds, 1 inch = 2.54 cm, 12 inches = 1 foot, etc.)
- As a result of counting (6 faces on a cube or dice, two hydrogen atoms in a water molecule, 3 peas in a pod, etc.)

Example \(\PageIndex{1}\)

How many significant figures does each number have?

- 6,798,000
- 6,000,798
- 6,000,798.00
- 0.0006798

**Answer a**-
four (by rules 1 and 4)

**Answer b**-
seven (by rules 1 and 2)

**Answer c**-
nine (by rules 1, 2, and 4)

**Answer d**-
four (by rules 1 and 3)

Exercise \(\PageIndex{1}\)

How many significant figures does each number have?

- 2.1828
- 0.005505
- 55,050
- 5
- 500

**Answer a**- five
**Answer b**- four
**Answer c**- four
**Answer d**- one
**Answer e**- one

## Rounding off numbers

Before dealing with the specifics of the rules for determining the significant figures in a calculated result, we need to be able to round numbers correctly. To **round** a number, first decide how many significant figures the number should have. Once you know that, round to that many digits, starting from the left. **If the number immediately to the right of the last significant digit is less than 5, it is dropped and the value of the last significant digit remains the same. If the number immediately to the right of the last significant digit is greater than or equal to 5, the last significant digit is increased by 1.**

Consider the measurement 207.518m. Right now, the measurement contains six significant figures. How would we successively round it to fewer and fewer significant figures? Follow the process as outlined in Table 1.5.1.

Number of Significant Figures | Rounded Value | Reasoning |
---|---|---|

6 | 207.518 | All digits are significant |

5 | 207.52 | 8 rounds the 1 up to 2 |

4 | 207.5 | 2 is dropped |

3 | 208 | 5 rounds the 7 up to 8 |

2 | 210 | 8 is replaced by a 0 and rounds the 0 up to 1 |

1 | 200 | 1 is replaced by a 0 |

Notice that the more rounding that is done, the less reliable the figure is. An approximate value may be sufficient for some purposes, but scientific work requires a much higher level of detail.

It is important to be aware of significant figures when you are mathematically manipulating numbers. For example, dividing 125 by 307 on a calculator gives 0.4071661238… to an infinite number of digits. But do the digits in this answer have any practical meaning, especially when you are starting with numbers that have only three significant figures each? When performing mathematical operations, there are two rules for limiting the number of significant figures in an answer—one rule is for addition and subtraction, and one rule is for multiplication and division.

In operations involving significant figures, the answer is reported in such a way that it reflects the reliability of theleast preciseoperation. An answer is no more precise than the least precise number used to get the answer.

## Rules for Combining Numbers

For **addition or subtraction**, the rule requires that the **answer should be rounded to the same number of decimal places** as the number with the least decimal places used in the calculation. For example, consider the following addition:

The arrow points to the rightmost column in which the number with the least decimal place is located. Therefore, we will limit our final answer to one decimal place. Is our final answer therefore 1,459.0? No, because when we drop digits from the end of a number, we also have to round the number. Notice that the first dropped digit, in the hundredths place, is 8. This suggests that the answer is actually closer to 1,459.1 than it is to 1,459.0, so we need to round up to **1,459.1**. The standard rules for rounding numbers are simple: If the first dropped digit is 5 or higher, round up. If the first dropped digit is lower than 5, do not round up.

For **multiplication or division**, the rule states that the answer should have the **same number of significant figures** as the number with the least significant figure used in the calculation, in other words, we must count the number of significant figures in each number being multiplied or divided and then limit the significant figures in the answer to the lowest count. An example is as follows:

The final answer, limited to four significant figures, is **4,094**. The first digit dropped is 1, so we do not round up.

Scientific notation provides a way of communicating significant figures without ambiguity. You simply include all the significant figures in the leading number. For example, the number 4,000 has one significant figure and should be written as the number 4 × 10^{4}. The number^{ }450 has two significant figures and would be written in scientific notation as 4.5 × 10^{2}, whereas 450.0 has four significant figures and would be written as 4.500 × 10^{2}. In scientific notation, all reported digits are significant.

Example \(\PageIndex{2}\)

Write the answer for each expression using scientific notation with the appropriate number of significant figures.

- 23.096 × 90.300
- 125 × 9.000
- 1,027 + 610.0 + 363.06

**Answer a**-
The calculator answer is 2,085.5688, but we need to round it to five significant figures. Because the first digit to be dropped (in the hundredths place) is greater than 5, we round up to 2,085.6, which in scientific notation is 2.0856 × 10

^{3}. **Answer b**-
The calculator gives 1,125 as the answer, but we limit it to three significant figures and convert into scientific notation: 1.13 × 10

^{3}. **Answer c**-
The calculator gives 2,000.06 as the answer, but because 1,027 has its farthest-right significant figure in the ones column, our answer must be limited to the ones position: 2,000 which in scientific notation is 2.000 × 10

^{3}.

Exercise \(\PageIndex{2}\)

Write the answer for each expression using scientific notation with the appropriate number of significant figures.

- 217 ÷ 903
- 13.77 + 908.226 + 515
- 255.0 − 99
- 0.00666 × 321

**Answer a**- 0.240 = 2.40 x 10
^{-1} **Answer b**- 1437 = 1.437 x 10
^{3} **Answer c**- 156 = 1.56 x 10
^{2} **Answer d**- 2.14 = 2.14 x 10
^{0}

Remember that calculators do not understand significant figures. *You* are the one who must apply the rules of significant figures to a result from your calculator.

## Concept Review Exercises

- Explain why the concept of significant figures is important in scientific measurements.
- State the rules for determining the significant figures in a measurement.
- When do you round a number up, and when do you not round a number up?

## Answers

- Significant figures represent all the known digits of a measurement plus the first estimated one. It gives information about how precise the measuring device and measurement is.
- All nonzero digits are significant; zeros between nonzero digits are significant; zeros at the end of a nondecimal number or the beginning of a decimal number are not significant; zeros at the end of a decimal number are significant.
- Round up only if the first digit dropped is 5 or higher.

## Key Takeaways

- Significant figures properly report the number of measured and estimated digits in a measurement.
- The rule in multiplication and division is that the final answer should have the same number of significant figures as there are in the value with the fewest significant figures.
- The rule in addition and subtraction is that the final answer should have the same number of decimal places as the term with the fewest decimal places.

## Citations

- Significant Digits. (2020, August 15). Retrieved May 18, 2021, from https://chem.libretexts.org/@go/page/352
- Expressing Numbers - Significant Figures. (2020, August 17). Retrieved May 18, 2021, from https://chem.libretexts.org/@go/page/16184