1.14.23: Enzyme-Substrate Interaction
- Page ID
- 375473
\( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)
\( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)
\( \newcommand{\dsum}{\displaystyle\sum\limits} \)
\( \newcommand{\dint}{\displaystyle\int\limits} \)
\( \newcommand{\dlim}{\displaystyle\lim\limits} \)
\( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)
( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)
\( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)
\( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)
\( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)
\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)
\( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\)
\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)
\( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)
\( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)
\( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\)
\( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)
\( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\)
\( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)
\( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)
\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)
\( \newcommand{\vectorA}[1]{\vec{#1}} % arrow\)
\( \newcommand{\vectorAt}[1]{\vec{\text{#1}}} % arrow\)
\( \newcommand{\vectorB}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)
\( \newcommand{\vectorC}[1]{\textbf{#1}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vectorD}[1]{\overrightarrow{#1}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vectorDt}[1]{\overrightarrow{\text{#1}}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vectE}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{\mathbf {#1}}}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)
\(\newcommand{\longvect}{\overrightarrow}\)
\( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)
\(\newcommand{\ket}[1]{\left| #1 \right>}\)
\(\newcommand{\bra}[1]{\left< #1 \right|}\)
\(\newcommand{\braket}[2]{\left< #1 \vphantom{#2} \right| \left. #2 \vphantom{#1} \right>}\)
\(\newcommand{\braopket}[3]{\left< #1 \vphantom{#2}\vphantom{#3} \right| #2 \vphantom{#1}\vphantom{#3} \left| #3 \vphantom{#1}\vphantom{#2} \right>}\)
\(\newcommand{\qmvec}[1]{\mathbf{\vec{#1}}}\)
\(\newcommand{\op}[1]{\hat{\mathbf{#1}}}\)
\(\newcommand{\expect}[1]{\langle #1 \rangle}\)
\(\newcommand{\dfn}[1]{\emph{\textbf{#1}}}\)
We consider the formation in aqueous solution of an enzyme –substrate complex \(\mathrm{ES}\) by an enzyme \(\mathrm{E}\) and substrate \(\mathrm{S}\). The system is prepared using \(\mathrm{n}^{0} (\mathrm{E})\) moles of enzyme and \(\mathrm{n}^{0} (\mathrm{S}\)) moles of substrate; equation (a)
| \(\mathrm{E}(\mathrm{aq}) +\) | \(\mathrm{S}(\mathrm{aq}) \Leftrightarrow\) | \(\mathrm{ES}(\mathrm{aq})\) | |
| At \(t = 0\) | \(\mathrm{n}^{0}(\mathrm{E})\) | \(\mathrm{n}^{0}(\mathrm{S})\) | \(0 \mathrm{~mol}\) |
| At \(t = \infty\) | \(n^{0}(E)-\xi\) | \(\mathrm{n}^{0}(\mathrm{~S})-\xi\) | \(\xi \mathrm{~mol}\) |
The upper limit of the extent of interaction \(\xi\) is controlled by whichever is the smallest amount, either \(\mathrm{n}^{0}(\mathrm{E})\) or \(\mathrm{n}^{0}(\mathrm{S})\). The latter two variables determine the total amount of \(\mathrm{ES}(\mathrm{aq})\) which can be formed in the limit of tight binding.
The approach described above can be extended to more complicated schemes involving multip-step reactions. In the following we consider the case where enzyme \(\mathrm{E}\) converts substrate \(\mathrm{A}\) into product \(\mathrm{D}\). The system is prepared using \(\mathrm{n}^{0}(\mathrm{E})\) moles of enzyme and \(\mathrm{n}^{0}(\mathrm{A})\) moles of substrate \(\mathrm{A}\) such that there are two intermediates \(\mathrm{EB}(\mathrm{aq})\) and \(\mathrm{EC}(\mathrm{aq})\), product \(\mathrm{D}\) being liberated from the bound state in the final step. The equilibrium state can be represented by the following scheme.
\[\begin{aligned}
&\mathrm{E}(\mathrm{aq}) \quad+\mathrm{A}(\mathrm{aq}) \Leftrightarrow \mathrm{EB}(\mathrm{aq}) \Leftrightarrow \mathrm{EC}(\mathrm{aq}) \Leftrightarrow \mathrm{E}(\mathrm{aq})+\mathrm{D}(\mathrm{aq})\\
&\mathrm{n}^{0}(\mathrm{E})-\xi_{1}+\xi_{3} \mathrm{n}^{0}(\mathrm{~A})-\xi_{1} \quad \xi_{1}-\xi_{2} \quad \xi_{2}-\xi_{3} \quad \mathrm{n}^{0}(\mathrm{E})-\xi_{1}+\xi_{3} \xi_{3}
\end{aligned} \nonumber \]
The key point is that at equilibrium the amounts of enzyme \(\mathrm{E}(\mathrm{aq})\) identified at both ends of the reaction must be the same. Further a mass balance shows that the total amount of enzyme present equals \(\mathrm{n}^{0}(\mathrm{E}) \mathrm{~mol}\). Other features are interesting; \(\xi_{3}\) must be zero if \(\xi_{2}\) is zero. The method can be applied to more complicated reaction schemes including those where the path from reactant to product involves parallel reactions.


